Pro turpitudine vitae: The expulsion of nuns in the dioceses of Paris and Laon, 1100–1150. Schulze, C. E. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto (Canada), Canada, 2008.
Pro turpitudine vitae: The expulsion of nuns in the dioceses of Paris and Laon, 1100–1150 [link]Paper  abstract   bibtex   
Through a careful analysis of royal, papal, and episcopal charters directly related to the expulsion, as well as a wider examination of each bishop's reforming activities within his diocese, we learn that the three key issues in these reforms were reputation, corrigibility, and jurisdiction. Each of our monastic communities had gained a negative reputation in the years preceding their expulsion, although this sinistra fama was not exclusively a matter of sexual misconduct. Furthermore, in two of our three cases the bishop responsible for the expulsion carefully asserted that numerous attempts had been made to correct the nuns, thus the expelled community is labeled as incorrigible. Finally, there is the matter of episcopal and proprietary jurisdiction. These monasteries were not truly independent. Rather, they were subject to the episcopal jurisdiction of their bishop, and in two of these cases, as royal monasteries, they were subject to the proprietary jurisdiction of the king. Therefore in these expulsions we see collaboration between the bishop, who held episcopal jurisdiction over these communities, and the king, the holder of proprietary jurisdiction, in the reform of communities of nuns during the first half of the twelfth century.
@phdthesis{schulze_pro_2008,
	address = {Canada},
	type = {Ph.{D}.},
	title = {Pro turpitudine vitae: {The} expulsion of nuns in the dioceses of {Paris} and {Laon}, 1100--1150},
	copyright = {Copyright ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing 2008},
	shorttitle = {Pro turpitudine vitae},
	url = {http://search.proquest.com.proxy.lib.uiowa.edu/pqdtft/docview/304347816/abstract/140A537124E4E49ECB4/1?accountid=14663},
	abstract = {Through a careful analysis of royal, papal, and episcopal charters directly related to the expulsion, as well as a wider examination of each bishop's reforming activities within his diocese, we learn that the three key issues in these reforms were reputation, corrigibility, and jurisdiction. Each of our monastic communities had gained a negative reputation in the years preceding their expulsion, although this sinistra fama was not exclusively a matter of sexual misconduct. Furthermore, in two of our three cases the bishop responsible for the expulsion carefully asserted that numerous attempts had been made to correct the nuns, thus the expelled community is labeled as incorrigible. Finally, there is the matter of episcopal and proprietary jurisdiction. These monasteries were not truly independent. Rather, they were subject to the episcopal jurisdiction of their bishop, and in two of these cases, as royal monasteries, they were subject to the proprietary jurisdiction of the king. Therefore in these expulsions we see collaboration between the bishop, who held episcopal jurisdiction over these communities, and the king, the holder of proprietary jurisdiction, in the reform of communities of nuns during the first half of the twelfth century.},
	language = {English},
	urldate = {2013-09-21TZ},
	school = {University of Toronto (Canada)},
	author = {Schulze, Catherine Elise},
	year = {2008},
	keywords = {read}
}

Downloads: 0