@ARTICLE{Sellberg2017247,
	author = {Sellberg, Charlott},
	title = {Simulators in bridge operations training and assessment: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis},
	year = {2017},
	journal = {WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs},
	volume = {16},
	number = {2},
	pages = {247 – 263},
	doi = {10.1007/s13437-016-0114-8},
	url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85020864820&doi=10.1007%2fs13437-016-0114-8&partnerID=40&md5=180a4a93281434b6a420e82c7e1a1d7e},
	abstract = {This article presents a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of the use of simulators in maritime education and training (MET), with a focus on bridge operations during navigation training and assessment. The review found 34 articles published in a wide range of academic journals, displaying a global field of research consisting of three main disciplines: Maritime professionals (n = 15), Human factors (n = 13) and Education (n = 6). An important conclusion made after synthesising the results of the studies is that while the potential of using simulators in training and assessment are clear, little is known about which instructional practices would ensure valid and reliable results of simulator-based education. Since MET institutions train their students for one of the most safety-critical industries in the world, there is a need for empirical studies that explore the use of simulator-based training and assessment further to lay the foundation for an evidence-based educational practice. © 2016, The Author(s).}
}

{"_id":"dzWxBD5rLsSTq8YNh","bibbaseid":"sellberg-simulatorsinbridgeoperationstrainingandassessmentasystematicreviewandqualitativesynthesis-2017","author_short":["Sellberg, C."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Sellberg"],"firstnames":["Charlott"],"suffixes":[]}],"title":"Simulators in bridge operations training and assessment: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis","year":"2017","journal":"WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs","volume":"16","number":"2","pages":"247 – 263","doi":"10.1007/s13437-016-0114-8","url":"https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85020864820&doi=10.1007%2fs13437-016-0114-8&partnerID=40&md5=180a4a93281434b6a420e82c7e1a1d7e","abstract":"This article presents a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of the use of simulators in maritime education and training (MET), with a focus on bridge operations during navigation training and assessment. The review found 34 articles published in a wide range of academic journals, displaying a global field of research consisting of three main disciplines: Maritime professionals (n = 15), Human factors (n = 13) and Education (n = 6). An important conclusion made after synthesising the results of the studies is that while the potential of using simulators in training and assessment are clear, little is known about which instructional practices would ensure valid and reliable results of simulator-based education. Since MET institutions train their students for one of the most safety-critical industries in the world, there is a need for empirical studies that explore the use of simulator-based training and assessment further to lay the foundation for an evidence-based educational practice. © 2016, The Author(s).","bibtex":"@ARTICLE{Sellberg2017247,\n\tauthor = {Sellberg, Charlott},\n\ttitle = {Simulators in bridge operations training and assessment: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tjournal = {WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs},\n\tvolume = {16},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\tpages = {247 – 263},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/s13437-016-0114-8},\n\turl = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85020864820&doi=10.1007%2fs13437-016-0114-8&partnerID=40&md5=180a4a93281434b6a420e82c7e1a1d7e},\n\tabstract = {This article presents a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of the use of simulators in maritime education and training (MET), with a focus on bridge operations during navigation training and assessment. The review found 34 articles published in a wide range of academic journals, displaying a global field of research consisting of three main disciplines: Maritime professionals (n = 15), Human factors (n = 13) and Education (n = 6). An important conclusion made after synthesising the results of the studies is that while the potential of using simulators in training and assessment are clear, little is known about which instructional practices would ensure valid and reliable results of simulator-based education. Since MET institutions train their students for one of the most safety-critical industries in the world, there is a need for empirical studies that explore the use of simulator-based training and assessment further to lay the foundation for an evidence-based educational practice. © 2016, The Author(s).}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Sellberg, C."],"key":"Sellberg2017247","id":"Sellberg2017247","bibbaseid":"sellberg-simulatorsinbridgeoperationstrainingandassessmentasystematicreviewandqualitativesynthesis-2017","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85020864820&doi=10.1007%2fs13437-016-0114-8&partnerID=40&md5=180a4a93281434b6a420e82c7e1a1d7e"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/network/files/Noe4RBhp8D33sYDn5","dataSources":["ddAmMAs5Py6tYiYCw","QpfHehytaHbRECdtw","AfkLYMpaG73NKMmPg","WwodjKzr9GNNtDNgv"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["simulators","bridge","operations","training","assessment","systematic","review","qualitative","synthesis","sellberg"],"title":"Simulators in bridge operations training and assessment: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis","year":2017}