A cluster analysis of harmony in the McGill Billboard dataset. Shaffer, K., Vasiete, E., Jacquez, B., Davis, A., Escalante, D., Hicks, C., McCann, J., Noufi, C., & Salminen, P. Empirical Musicology Review, 14(3-4):146, jul, 2020.
Paper doi abstract bibtex We set out to perform a cluster analysis of harmonic structures (specifically, chord-to-chord transitions) in the McGill Billboard dataset, to determine whether there is evidence of multiple harmonic grammars and practices in the corpus, and if so, what the optimal division of songs, according to those harmonic grammars, is. We define optimal as providing meaningful, specific information about the harmonic practices of songs in the cluster, but being general enough to be used as a guide to songwriting and predictive listening. We test two hypotheses in our cluster analysis — first that 5–9 clusters would be optimal, based on the work of Walter Everett (2004), and second that 15 clusters would be optimal, based on a set of user-generated genre tags reported by Hendrik Schreiber (2015). We subjected the harmonic structures for each song in the corpus to a K-means cluster analysis. We conclude that the optimal clustering solution is likely to be within the 5–8 cluster range. We also propose that a map of cluster types emerging as the number of clusters increases from one to eight constitutes a greater aid to our understanding of how various harmonic practices, styles, and sub-styles comprise the McGill Billboard dataset.
@Article{ shaffer.ea2020-cluster,
author = {Shaffer, Kris and Vasiete, Esther and Jacquez, Brandon
and Davis, Aaron and Escalante, Diego and Hicks, Calvin
and McCann, Joshua and Noufi, Camille and Salminen, Paul},
year = {2020},
title = {A cluster analysis of harmony in the McGill Billboard
dataset},
abstract = {We set out to perform a cluster analysis of harmonic
structures (specifically, chord-to-chord transitions) in
the McGill Billboard dataset, to determine whether there
is evidence of multiple harmonic grammars and practices in
the corpus, and if so, what the optimal division of songs,
according to those harmonic grammars, is. We define
optimal as providing meaningful, specific information
about the harmonic practices of songs in the cluster, but
being general enough to be used as a guide to songwriting
and predictive listening. We test two hypotheses in our
cluster analysis — first that 5–9 clusters would be
optimal, based on the work of Walter Everett (2004), and
second that 15 clusters would be optimal, based on a set
of user-generated genre tags reported by Hendrik Schreiber
(2015). We subjected the harmonic structures for each song
in the corpus to a K-means cluster analysis. We conclude
that the optimal clustering solution is likely to be
within the 5--8 cluster range. We also propose that a map
of cluster types emerging as the number of clusters
increases from one to eight constitutes a greater aid to
our understanding of how various harmonic practices,
styles, and sub-styles comprise the McGill Billboard
dataset.},
doi = {10.18061/emr.v14i3-4.5576},
issn = {1559-5749},
journal = {Empirical Musicology Review},
keywords = {McGill Billboard dataset,cluster analysis,harmonic
syntax,machine learning,music analysis with
computers,pop/rock,rock,transitional
probability,visualization},
mendeley-tags= {music analysis with computers},
month = {jul},
number = {3-4},
pages = {146},
url = {https://emusicology.org/article/view/5576},
volume = {14}
}