@Article{Shatzman2006b,
  author   = {Keren B Shatzman and James M McQueen},
  journal  = {Percept Psychophys},
  title    = {Segment duration as a cue to word boundaries in spoken-word recognition.},
  year     = {2006},
  number   = {1},
  pages    = {1-16},
  volume   = {68},
  abstract = {In two eye-tracking experiments, we examined the degree to which listeners
	use acoustic cues to word boundaries. Dutch participants listened
	to ambiguous sentences in which stop-initial words (e.g., pot, jar)
	were preceded by eens (once); the sentences could thus also refer
	to cluster-initial words (e.g., een spot, a spotlight). The participants
	made fewer fixations to target pictures (e.g., ajar) when the target
	and the preceding [s] were replaced by a recording of the cluster-initial
	word than when they were spliced from another token of the target-bearing
	sentence (Experiment 1). Although acoustic analyses revealed several
	differences between the two recordings, only [s] duration correlated
	with the participants' fixations (more target fixations for shorter
	[s]s). Thus, we found that listeners apparently do not use all available
	acoustic differences equally. In Experiment 2, the participants made
	more fixations to target pictures when the [s] was shortened than
	when it was lengthened. Utterance interpretation can therefore be
	influenced by individual segment duration alone.},
  doi      = {10.3758/bf03193651},
  keywords = {Cues, Humans, Recognition (Psychology), Speech Perception, Time Factors, Vocabulary, 16617825},
}

{"_id":"9zAFuJQq6Du8Pd6qM","bibbaseid":"shatzman-mcqueen-segmentdurationasacuetowordboundariesinspokenwordrecognition-2006","author_short":["Shatzman, K. B","McQueen, J. M"],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","author":[{"firstnames":["Keren","B"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Shatzman"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["James","M"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["McQueen"],"suffixes":[]}],"journal":"Percept Psychophys","title":"Segment duration as a cue to word boundaries in spoken-word recognition.","year":"2006","number":"1","pages":"1-16","volume":"68","abstract":"In two eye-tracking experiments, we examined the degree to which listeners use acoustic cues to word boundaries. Dutch participants listened to ambiguous sentences in which stop-initial words (e.g., pot, jar) were preceded by eens (once); the sentences could thus also refer to cluster-initial words (e.g., een spot, a spotlight). The participants made fewer fixations to target pictures (e.g., ajar) when the target and the preceding [s] were replaced by a recording of the cluster-initial word than when they were spliced from another token of the target-bearing sentence (Experiment 1). Although acoustic analyses revealed several differences between the two recordings, only [s] duration correlated with the participants' fixations (more target fixations for shorter [s]s). Thus, we found that listeners apparently do not use all available acoustic differences equally. In Experiment 2, the participants made more fixations to target pictures when the [s] was shortened than when it was lengthened. Utterance interpretation can therefore be influenced by individual segment duration alone.","doi":"10.3758/bf03193651","keywords":"Cues, Humans, Recognition (Psychology), Speech Perception, Time Factors, Vocabulary, 16617825","bibtex":"@Article{Shatzman2006b,\n author = {Keren B Shatzman and James M McQueen},\n journal = {Percept Psychophys},\n title = {Segment duration as a cue to word boundaries in spoken-word recognition.},\n year = {2006},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1-16},\n volume = {68},\n abstract = {In two eye-tracking experiments, we examined the degree to which listeners\n\tuse acoustic cues to word boundaries. Dutch participants listened\n\tto ambiguous sentences in which stop-initial words (e.g., pot, jar)\n\twere preceded by eens (once); the sentences could thus also refer\n\tto cluster-initial words (e.g., een spot, a spotlight). The participants\n\tmade fewer fixations to target pictures (e.g., ajar) when the target\n\tand the preceding [s] were replaced by a recording of the cluster-initial\n\tword than when they were spliced from another token of the target-bearing\n\tsentence (Experiment 1). Although acoustic analyses revealed several\n\tdifferences between the two recordings, only [s] duration correlated\n\twith the participants' fixations (more target fixations for shorter\n\t[s]s). Thus, we found that listeners apparently do not use all available\n\tacoustic differences equally. In Experiment 2, the participants made\n\tmore fixations to target pictures when the [s] was shortened than\n\twhen it was lengthened. Utterance interpretation can therefore be\n\tinfluenced by individual segment duration alone.},\n doi = {10.3758/bf03193651},\n keywords = {Cues, Humans, Recognition (Psychology), Speech Perception, Time Factors, Vocabulary, 16617825},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Shatzman, K. B","McQueen, J. M"],"key":"Shatzman2006b","id":"Shatzman2006b","bibbaseid":"shatzman-mcqueen-segmentdurationasacuetowordboundariesinspokenwordrecognition-2006","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["Cues","Humans","Recognition (Psychology)","Speech Perception","Time Factors","Vocabulary","16617825"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://endress.org/publications/ansgar.bib","dataSources":["xPGxHAeh3vZpx4yyE","TXa55dQbNoWnaGmMq"],"keywords":["cues","humans","recognition (psychology)","speech perception","time factors","vocabulary","16617825"],"search_terms":["segment","duration","cue","word","boundaries","spoken","word","recognition","shatzman","mcqueen"],"title":"Segment duration as a cue to word boundaries in spoken-word recognition.","year":2006}