@article{af387e71d0e5414b93b4ab7b7c66a69e,
  title    = "Ranking Agent Statements for Building Evolving Ontologies",
  abstract = "In this paper a methodology is described for ranking information received by different agents, based on previous experience with them. These rankings again are used for asking the right questions to the right agents. In this way agents can build up a reputation. The methods in this paper are strongly influenced on human heuristics regarding the assignment of confidence ratings on humans. The methods provide a solution to current problems with ontologies: (1) handling contradicting and sloppy information, (2) efficient network use instead of broadcasting information and (3) dealing with ontological drift.",
  author   = "Ronny Siebes and {van Harmelen}, Frank",
  year     = "2002",
  doi      = "10.1.1.6.8294",
  pages    = "2--4",
  journal  = "Workshop on Meaning Negotation, in conjunction with the Eighteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence",
}

{"_id":{"_str":"53425cb30e946d920a000ba5"},"__v":156,"authorIDs":["3obmQ57ktWcYPG9dJ","54573d5e2abc8e9f370001f6","5de727fb97054edf010000c1","5dea103bfac96fde01000184","5deb5f460ff3bbdf010000d1","5deba5e19abf64df01000061","5def85b045114dde010000d9","5df1db001070c8ef01000133","5df2d9b379c00ade01000122","5df3ad4eec6029de010000dd","5df7e18ddc100cde0100016e","5dfc11c9b371afde010000fc","5e004ddc63155bde0100004b","5e048417db7916df010000ad","5e08b6da7dc1dcdf010000cb","5e0cd9f66762d1de010000ab","5e0d1dd49ecb35de01000107","5e0da304675bf1de0100009f","5e0db208c7ca67df01000042","5e110aa2d6a01ede01000094","5e14998e830852de01000048","5e1aee555f3d2cdf0100012c","5e1ee07a875c69df010000f1","5e21a5ed3ef35cdf0100014f","5e24a1a31a6264de01000014","5e24d16e981ceddf010000a0","5e2ca60dcca05fde01000002","5e373b254cbab2df010000b5","5e381f370691b8de0100012e","5e391f337f8bf3f30100009b","5e3d460bdc4cd0f301000080","5e412f0fb54187de010001fd","5e46956e2e79a6df01000015","5e4f90e342a908de010000f0","5e55e1eec2c8a2df0100004b","5e55fb91819fabdf01000043","5e5d399073eb2edf0100005d","5e62c9b48f9dfede01000012","5e69ec413aab3cdf01000236","5e6a6051d37d43de0100021a","5uNwRzqPShqjj5w7n","67aLTCWbjGwkDDC9D","95DQ5KcEuc84FLGpw","9RwLS5Tu3kXtxYNXD","AZSDESQhTC3QweCiq","AgKpe75fbth2Q8zbs","Bm6s5DR3MSgxJ3wWr","BpJxc38YKyqTpBDhA","E5rA8DH9RCbZ8trMX","Er2P5Yhz7RkA8HH5Q","GuR62ZXthJcND8FNe","HK78wHnj2BKwHox8E","QxvM7gxJduoC5ACWE","SCujaYWzkdYmyT2Eo","cy8fYiReXtfHc2tqN","etKTQjxCiA468douC","fX6HifTArZSbcCozd","jde8THxMDAYEbySTP","ot9kP7ojCmwzzGy2d","oynzRoATcqFByjhqE","qBc7At3jT9LnqBMw3","rey8AwcLiwHEcvMRX","shBRjbZTLWKah2ebY","tdg6Pso6ddJK2rTaD","uhynEQbsamWFGmHHD","zyWJw2NzMcSAHredn"],"author_short":["Siebes, R.","van Harmelen , F."],"bibbaseid":"siebes-vanharmelen-rankingagentstatementsforbuildingevolvingontologies-2002","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Ranking Agent Statements for Building Evolving Ontologies","abstract":"In this paper a methodology is described for ranking information received by different agents, based on previous experience with them. These rankings again are used for asking the right questions to the right agents. In this way agents can build up a reputation. The methods in this paper are strongly influenced on human heuristics regarding the assignment of confidence ratings on humans. The methods provide a solution to current problems with ontologies: (1) handling contradicting and sloppy information, (2) efficient network use instead of broadcasting information and (3) dealing with ontological drift.","author":[{"firstnames":["Ronny"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Siebes"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":["van Harmelen"],"lastnames":[],"firstnames":["Frank"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2002","doi":"10.1.1.6.8294","pages":"2–4","journal":"Workshop on Meaning Negotation, in conjunction with the Eighteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence","bibtex":"@article{af387e71d0e5414b93b4ab7b7c66a69e,\n title = \"Ranking Agent Statements for Building Evolving Ontologies\",\n abstract = \"In this paper a methodology is described for ranking information received by different agents, based on previous experience with them. These rankings again are used for asking the right questions to the right agents. In this way agents can build up a reputation. The methods in this paper are strongly influenced on human heuristics regarding the assignment of confidence ratings on humans. The methods provide a solution to current problems with ontologies: (1) handling contradicting and sloppy information, (2) efficient network use instead of broadcasting information and (3) dealing with ontological drift.\",\n author = \"Ronny Siebes and {van Harmelen}, Frank\",\n year = \"2002\",\n doi = \"10.1.1.6.8294\",\n pages = \"2--4\",\n journal = \"Workshop on Meaning Negotation, in conjunction with the Eighteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence\",\n}\n\n\n","author_short":["Siebes, R.","van Harmelen , F."],"key":"af387e71d0e5414b93b4ab7b7c66a69e","id":"af387e71d0e5414b93b4ab7b7c66a69e","bibbaseid":"siebes-vanharmelen-rankingagentstatementsforbuildingevolvingontologies-2002","role":"author","urls":{},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{"van harmelen, f":"https://www.cs.vu.nl/"}},"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/KRRVU/website/master/publications/krr.bib","downloads":0,"keywords":[],"search_terms":["ranking","agent","statements","building","evolving","ontologies","siebes","van harmelen "],"title":"Ranking Agent Statements for Building Evolving Ontologies","year":2002,"dataSources":["H6xuGqu5uQ6rXhdJ4","dJmTXpbSWWjnxatYT"]}