@article{silva_instruments_2023,
	title = {Instruments to {Assess} {Evidence}-{Based} {Practice} {Among} {Health} {Care} {Professionals}: {A} {Systematic} {Review}},
	issn = {1552-6127},
	shorttitle = {Instruments to {Assess} {Evidence}-{Based} {Practice} {Among} {Health} {Care} {Professionals}},
	doi = {10.1177/10901981231170154},
	abstract = {BACKGROUND: The use of measurement instruments to assess the use of Evidence-Based Practice by health professionals has been frequently reported in studies.
AIMS: This systematic review aimed to summarize, describe, and evaluate the measurement properties of the instruments that evaluate the use of Evidence-Based Practice in health professionals.
METHODS: The search was carried out in four databases considering three groups of search terms: evidence-based practice, evaluation, and measurement proprieties. Studies were included that described the use of instruments to assess Evidence-Based Practice in health professionals, with the full-text publication, which analyzed the measurement properties, in English. The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated using COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments.
RESULTS: In total, 6,429 were found and only 92 were eligible for data analysis. Forty new instruments were identified most were developed for nursing and physical therapist. The investigators performed at least 1 type of validity test on 73\% of the instruments. Reliability was tested at 90\%, through internal consistency. Responsiveness was tested on less than half of the instruments (30\%). Most of the instruments identified are reliable and valid to measure evidence-based practice in health professionals.
CONCLUSION: Although the Fresno Test remains the most complete instrument, and adequate for use. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments checklist classified 7 (seven) instruments as suitable for the target audience.},
	language = {eng},
	journal = {Health Education \& Behavior: The Official Publication of the Society for Public Health Education},
	author = {Silva, Anderson Martins da and Valentim, Daniela Pereira and Martins, Adriana Leite and Padula, Rosimeire Simprini},
	month = jun,
	year = {2023},
	pmid = {37264545},
	keywords = {formative evaluation, health education, healthcare, measurement},
	pages = {10901981231170154},
}

{"_id":"g9xFun5PyrX33jZzY","bibbaseid":"silva-valentim-martins-padula-instrumentstoassessevidencebasedpracticeamonghealthcareprofessionalsasystematicreview-2023","author_short":["Silva, A. M. d.","Valentim, D. P.","Martins, A. L.","Padula, R. S."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Instruments to Assess Evidence-Based Practice Among Health Care Professionals: A Systematic Review","issn":"1552-6127","shorttitle":"Instruments to Assess Evidence-Based Practice Among Health Care Professionals","doi":"10.1177/10901981231170154","abstract":"BACKGROUND: The use of measurement instruments to assess the use of Evidence-Based Practice by health professionals has been frequently reported in studies. AIMS: This systematic review aimed to summarize, describe, and evaluate the measurement properties of the instruments that evaluate the use of Evidence-Based Practice in health professionals. METHODS: The search was carried out in four databases considering three groups of search terms: evidence-based practice, evaluation, and measurement proprieties. Studies were included that described the use of instruments to assess Evidence-Based Practice in health professionals, with the full-text publication, which analyzed the measurement properties, in English. The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated using COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments. RESULTS: In total, 6,429 were found and only 92 were eligible for data analysis. Forty new instruments were identified most were developed for nursing and physical therapist. The investigators performed at least 1 type of validity test on 73% of the instruments. Reliability was tested at 90%, through internal consistency. Responsiveness was tested on less than half of the instruments (30%). Most of the instruments identified are reliable and valid to measure evidence-based practice in health professionals. CONCLUSION: Although the Fresno Test remains the most complete instrument, and adequate for use. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments checklist classified 7 (seven) instruments as suitable for the target audience.","language":"eng","journal":"Health Education & Behavior: The Official Publication of the Society for Public Health Education","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Silva"],"firstnames":["Anderson","Martins","da"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Valentim"],"firstnames":["Daniela","Pereira"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Martins"],"firstnames":["Adriana","Leite"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Padula"],"firstnames":["Rosimeire","Simprini"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"June","year":"2023","pmid":"37264545","keywords":"formative evaluation, health education, healthcare, measurement","pages":"10901981231170154","bibtex":"@article{silva_instruments_2023,\n\ttitle = {Instruments to {Assess} {Evidence}-{Based} {Practice} {Among} {Health} {Care} {Professionals}: {A} {Systematic} {Review}},\n\tissn = {1552-6127},\n\tshorttitle = {Instruments to {Assess} {Evidence}-{Based} {Practice} {Among} {Health} {Care} {Professionals}},\n\tdoi = {10.1177/10901981231170154},\n\tabstract = {BACKGROUND: The use of measurement instruments to assess the use of Evidence-Based Practice by health professionals has been frequently reported in studies.\nAIMS: This systematic review aimed to summarize, describe, and evaluate the measurement properties of the instruments that evaluate the use of Evidence-Based Practice in health professionals.\nMETHODS: The search was carried out in four databases considering three groups of search terms: evidence-based practice, evaluation, and measurement proprieties. Studies were included that described the use of instruments to assess Evidence-Based Practice in health professionals, with the full-text publication, which analyzed the measurement properties, in English. The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated using COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments.\nRESULTS: In total, 6,429 were found and only 92 were eligible for data analysis. Forty new instruments were identified most were developed for nursing and physical therapist. The investigators performed at least 1 type of validity test on 73\\% of the instruments. Reliability was tested at 90\\%, through internal consistency. Responsiveness was tested on less than half of the instruments (30\\%). Most of the instruments identified are reliable and valid to measure evidence-based practice in health professionals.\nCONCLUSION: Although the Fresno Test remains the most complete instrument, and adequate for use. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments checklist classified 7 (seven) instruments as suitable for the target audience.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tjournal = {Health Education \\& Behavior: The Official Publication of the Society for Public Health Education},\n\tauthor = {Silva, Anderson Martins da and Valentim, Daniela Pereira and Martins, Adriana Leite and Padula, Rosimeire Simprini},\n\tmonth = jun,\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tpmid = {37264545},\n\tkeywords = {formative evaluation, health education, healthcare, measurement},\n\tpages = {10901981231170154},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Silva, A. M. d.","Valentim, D. P.","Martins, A. L.","Padula, R. S."],"key":"silva_instruments_2023","id":"silva_instruments_2023","bibbaseid":"silva-valentim-martins-padula-instrumentstoassessevidencebasedpracticeamonghealthcareprofessionalsasystematicreview-2023","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["formative evaluation","health education","healthcare","measurement"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/groups/2149284/items?key=Tc2D7xMBOC0VRcc11br4cQZZ&format=bibtex&limit=100","dataSources":["Mbi95emQ5h7aP3sGL"],"keywords":["formative evaluation","health education","healthcare","measurement"],"search_terms":["instruments","assess","evidence","based","practice","health","care","professionals","systematic","review","silva","valentim","martins","padula"],"title":"Instruments to Assess Evidence-Based Practice Among Health Care Professionals: A Systematic Review","year":2023}