False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant. Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. Psychological Science, 22(11):1359–1366, November, 2011. Publisher: SAGE Publications IncPaper doi abstract bibtex In this article, we accomplish two things. First, we show that despite empirical psychologists’ nominal endorsement of a low rate of false-positive findings (≤ .05), flexibility in data collection, analysis, and reporting dramatically increases actual false-positive rates. In many cases, a researcher is more likely to falsely find evidence that an effect exists than to correctly find evidence that it does not. We present computer simulations and a pair of actual experiments that demonstrate how unacceptably easy it is to accumulate (and report) statistically significant evidence for a false hypothesis. Second, we suggest a simple, low-cost, and straightforwardly effective disclosure-based solution to this problem. The solution involves six concrete requirements for authors and four guidelines for reviewers, all of which impose a minimal burden on the publication process.
@article{simmons_false-positive_2011,
title = {False-{Positive} {Psychology}: {Undisclosed} {Flexibility} in {Data} {Collection} and {Analysis} {Allows} {Presenting} {Anything} as {Significant}},
volume = {22},
issn = {0956-7976},
shorttitle = {False-{Positive} {Psychology}},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632},
doi = {10.1177/0956797611417632},
abstract = {In this article, we accomplish two things. First, we show that despite empirical psychologists’ nominal endorsement of a low rate of false-positive findings (≤ .05), flexibility in data collection, analysis, and reporting dramatically increases actual false-positive rates. In many cases, a researcher is more likely to falsely find evidence that an effect exists than to correctly find evidence that it does not. We present computer simulations and a pair of actual experiments that demonstrate how unacceptably easy it is to accumulate (and report) statistically significant evidence for a false hypothesis. Second, we suggest a simple, low-cost, and straightforwardly effective disclosure-based solution to this problem. The solution involves six concrete requirements for authors and four guidelines for reviewers, all of which impose a minimal burden on the publication process.},
language = {en},
number = {11},
urldate = {2021-11-08},
journal = {Psychological Science},
author = {Simmons, Joseph P. and Nelson, Leif D. and Simonsohn, Uri},
month = nov,
year = {2011},
note = {Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc},
keywords = {disclosure, methodology, motivated reasoning, publication},
pages = {1359--1366},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"N9xdCRisQAZrew3Tw","bibbaseid":"simmons-nelson-simonsohn-falsepositivepsychologyundisclosedflexibilityindatacollectionandanalysisallowspresentinganythingassignificant-2011","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2017-06-22T15:25:17.220Z","title":"False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant","author_short":["Simmons, J. P.","Nelson, L. D.","Simonsohn, U."],"year":2011,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/groups/4504479/items?key=BfP7bN7FF9dJwtyiLBORewdg&format=bibtex&limit=100","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant","volume":"22","issn":"0956-7976","shorttitle":"False-Positive Psychology","url":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632","doi":"10.1177/0956797611417632","abstract":"In this article, we accomplish two things. First, we show that despite empirical psychologists’ nominal endorsement of a low rate of false-positive findings (≤ .05), flexibility in data collection, analysis, and reporting dramatically increases actual false-positive rates. In many cases, a researcher is more likely to falsely find evidence that an effect exists than to correctly find evidence that it does not. We present computer simulations and a pair of actual experiments that demonstrate how unacceptably easy it is to accumulate (and report) statistically significant evidence for a false hypothesis. Second, we suggest a simple, low-cost, and straightforwardly effective disclosure-based solution to this problem. The solution involves six concrete requirements for authors and four guidelines for reviewers, all of which impose a minimal burden on the publication process.","language":"en","number":"11","urldate":"2021-11-08","journal":"Psychological Science","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Simmons"],"firstnames":["Joseph","P."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Nelson"],"firstnames":["Leif","D."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Simonsohn"],"firstnames":["Uri"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"November","year":"2011","note":"Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc","keywords":"disclosure, methodology, motivated reasoning, publication","pages":"1359–1366","bibtex":"@article{simmons_false-positive_2011,\n\ttitle = {False-{Positive} {Psychology}: {Undisclosed} {Flexibility} in {Data} {Collection} and {Analysis} {Allows} {Presenting} {Anything} as {Significant}},\n\tvolume = {22},\n\tissn = {0956-7976},\n\tshorttitle = {False-{Positive} {Psychology}},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632},\n\tdoi = {10.1177/0956797611417632},\n\tabstract = {In this article, we accomplish two things. First, we show that despite empirical psychologists’ nominal endorsement of a low rate of false-positive findings (≤ .05), flexibility in data collection, analysis, and reporting dramatically increases actual false-positive rates. In many cases, a researcher is more likely to falsely find evidence that an effect exists than to correctly find evidence that it does not. We present computer simulations and a pair of actual experiments that demonstrate how unacceptably easy it is to accumulate (and report) statistically significant evidence for a false hypothesis. Second, we suggest a simple, low-cost, and straightforwardly effective disclosure-based solution to this problem. The solution involves six concrete requirements for authors and four guidelines for reviewers, all of which impose a minimal burden on the publication process.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {11},\n\turldate = {2021-11-08},\n\tjournal = {Psychological Science},\n\tauthor = {Simmons, Joseph P. and Nelson, Leif D. and Simonsohn, Uri},\n\tmonth = nov,\n\tyear = {2011},\n\tnote = {Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc},\n\tkeywords = {disclosure, methodology, motivated reasoning, publication},\n\tpages = {1359--1366},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Simmons, J. P.","Nelson, L. D.","Simonsohn, U."],"key":"simmons_false-positive_2011","id":"simmons_false-positive_2011","bibbaseid":"simmons-nelson-simonsohn-falsepositivepsychologyundisclosedflexibilityindatacollectionandanalysisallowspresentinganythingassignificant-2011","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632"},"keyword":["disclosure","methodology","motivated reasoning","publication"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["false","positive","psychology","undisclosed","flexibility","data","collection","analysis","allows","presenting","anything","significant","simmons","nelson","simonsohn"],"keywords":["disclosure","methodology","motivated reasoning","publication"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["bwPZM9JsWanZLaoSc","eTsH756eicg6vxuG3","AePvmKAczbmbEoiJB","KH7thnXN2aoT9q4Pu","bb9wnMe4gzczbyaCs","36e8dyqnuMgmMfSnj","8uJY8jTfcc9uNmCh8","5qXSH7BrePnXHtcrf","6jPAToGhkics4uJu3"]}