Responsive to whom? Political advising and elected careers in institutionalized democracies. Snagovsky, F., Taflaga, M., & Kerby, M. Party Politics, March, 2022. ![Responsive to whom? Political advising and elected careers in institutionalized democracies [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex Political advising is an increasingly important stepping-stone for a parliamentary career in many advanced democracies. Not only does this trend inform our understanding of political parties and careers, there is reason to think former advisors may have distinct attitudes compared to other types of elected officials. Using elite survey data from 42 elections in 21 countries, this study asks whether former political advisers approach representation differently than candidates with other pre-legislative experience. We find that they do. In particular, former advisors are more willing to prioritize their party’s preferences over their constituents’ preferences, and favor their own convictions over their constituent’s priorities. These findings demonstrate that former advisors have a more party-centric approach to representation, consistent with the “loyal partisan” archetype. The results inform our understanding of an increasingly common pathway to elected office as well as the personalization and professionalization of politics and have important implications for representative democracy.
@article{snagovsky_responsive_2022,
title = {Responsive to whom? {Political} advising and elected careers in institutionalized democracies},
issn = {1354-0688, 1460-3683},
shorttitle = {Responsive to whom?},
url = {http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13540688221079299},
doi = {10.1177/13540688221079299},
abstract = {Political advising is an increasingly important stepping-stone for a parliamentary career in many advanced democracies. Not only does this trend inform our understanding of political parties and careers, there is reason to think former advisors may have distinct attitudes compared to other types of elected officials. Using elite survey data from 42 elections in 21 countries, this study asks whether former political advisers approach representation differently than candidates with other pre-legislative experience. We find that they do. In particular, former advisors are more willing to prioritize their party’s preferences over their constituents’ preferences, and favor their own convictions over their constituent’s priorities. These findings demonstrate that former advisors have a more party-centric approach to representation, consistent with the “loyal partisan” archetype. The results inform our understanding of an increasingly common pathway to elected office as well as the personalization and professionalization of politics and have important implications for representative democracy.},
language = {en},
urldate = {2022-12-08},
journal = {Party Politics},
author = {Snagovsky, Feodor and Taflaga, Marija and Kerby, Matthew},
month = mar,
year = {2022},
pages = {135406882210792},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"JRJQ6dmWL3R4opvLT","bibbaseid":"snagovsky-taflaga-kerby-responsivetowhompoliticaladvisingandelectedcareersininstitutionalizeddemocracies-2022","author_short":["Snagovsky, F.","Taflaga, M.","Kerby, M."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Responsive to whom? Political advising and elected careers in institutionalized democracies","issn":"1354-0688, 1460-3683","shorttitle":"Responsive to whom?","url":"http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13540688221079299","doi":"10.1177/13540688221079299","abstract":"Political advising is an increasingly important stepping-stone for a parliamentary career in many advanced democracies. Not only does this trend inform our understanding of political parties and careers, there is reason to think former advisors may have distinct attitudes compared to other types of elected officials. Using elite survey data from 42 elections in 21 countries, this study asks whether former political advisers approach representation differently than candidates with other pre-legislative experience. We find that they do. In particular, former advisors are more willing to prioritize their party’s preferences over their constituents’ preferences, and favor their own convictions over their constituent’s priorities. These findings demonstrate that former advisors have a more party-centric approach to representation, consistent with the “loyal partisan” archetype. The results inform our understanding of an increasingly common pathway to elected office as well as the personalization and professionalization of politics and have important implications for representative democracy.","language":"en","urldate":"2022-12-08","journal":"Party Politics","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Snagovsky"],"firstnames":["Feodor"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Taflaga"],"firstnames":["Marija"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Kerby"],"firstnames":["Matthew"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"March","year":"2022","pages":"135406882210792","bibtex":"@article{snagovsky_responsive_2022,\n\ttitle = {Responsive to whom? {Political} advising and elected careers in institutionalized democracies},\n\tissn = {1354-0688, 1460-3683},\n\tshorttitle = {Responsive to whom?},\n\turl = {http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13540688221079299},\n\tdoi = {10.1177/13540688221079299},\n\tabstract = {Political advising is an increasingly important stepping-stone for a parliamentary career in many advanced democracies. Not only does this trend inform our understanding of political parties and careers, there is reason to think former advisors may have distinct attitudes compared to other types of elected officials. Using elite survey data from 42 elections in 21 countries, this study asks whether former political advisers approach representation differently than candidates with other pre-legislative experience. We find that they do. In particular, former advisors are more willing to prioritize their party’s preferences over their constituents’ preferences, and favor their own convictions over their constituent’s priorities. These findings demonstrate that former advisors have a more party-centric approach to representation, consistent with the “loyal partisan” archetype. The results inform our understanding of an increasingly common pathway to elected office as well as the personalization and professionalization of politics and have important implications for representative democracy.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2022-12-08},\n\tjournal = {Party Politics},\n\tauthor = {Snagovsky, Feodor and Taflaga, Marija and Kerby, Matthew},\n\tmonth = mar,\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tpages = {135406882210792},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Snagovsky, F.","Taflaga, M.","Kerby, M."],"key":"snagovsky_responsive_2022","id":"snagovsky_responsive_2022","bibbaseid":"snagovsky-taflaga-kerby-responsivetowhompoliticaladvisingandelectedcareersininstitutionalizeddemocracies-2022","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13540688221079299"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/groups/2657327/items?key=yjNfUy850TsHa9g6k1iaV3yx&format=bibtex&limit=500","dataSources":["CkqhxhtvCKDPtfNqE","ogqG5PkGjWYQvg5WY"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["responsive","political","advising","elected","careers","institutionalized","democracies","snagovsky","taflaga","kerby"],"title":"Responsive to whom? Political advising and elected careers in institutionalized democracies","year":2022}