Do parties respond? How electoral context influences party responsiveness. Spoon, J. & Klüver, H. Electoral Studies, 35:48--60, 2014. 641doi abstract bibtex How responsive are political parties to the issue priorities of voters? While there are numerous studies that examine policy position congruence between parties and voters or government responsiveness, we know little about the extent to which parties adjust their policy priorities to the issue concerns of voters. Following saliency and issue ownership theory, we argue that political parties listen to their voters by emphasizing policy issues in their election manifestos that have been prioritized by citizens. However, in line with second-order election theory, we expect that issue responsiveness varies with the electoral context. To test our theoretical expectations, we generated a novel dataset that combines data on issue attention of political parties from the Comparative Manifesto and the Euromanifesto projects with data on policy priorities of voters from the European Election Studies, the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems and various national election studies. We empirically test our theoretical claims based on a comprehensive analysis of 104 parties from 17 countries competing in 84 national and European elections from 1986 to 2011. Our findings have important implications for political representation in Europe.
@article{ spoon_parties_2014,
title = {Do parties respond? {How} electoral context influences party responsiveness},
volume = {35},
issn = {02613794},
doi = {10.1016/j.electstud.2014.04.014},
abstract = {How responsive are political parties to the issue priorities of voters? While there are numerous studies that examine policy position congruence between parties and voters or government responsiveness, we know little about the extent to which parties adjust their policy priorities to the issue concerns of voters. Following saliency and issue ownership theory, we argue that political parties listen to their voters by emphasizing policy issues in their election manifestos that have been prioritized by citizens. However, in line with second-order election theory, we expect that issue responsiveness varies with the electoral context. To test our theoretical expectations, we generated a novel dataset that combines data on issue attention of political parties from the Comparative Manifesto and the Euromanifesto projects with data on policy priorities of voters from the European Election Studies, the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems and various national election studies. We empirically test our theoretical claims based on a comprehensive analysis of 104 parties from 17 countries competing in 84 national and European elections from 1986 to 2011. Our findings have important implications for political representation in Europe.},
journal = {Electoral Studies},
author = {Spoon, Jae-Jae and Klüver, Heike},
year = {2014},
note = {641},
keywords = {Austria, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, the Netherlands},
pages = {48--60}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"weTcircci8HW9ErdR","authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Spoon, J.","Klüver, H."],"bibbaseid":"spoon-klver-dopartiesrespondhowelectoralcontextinfluencespartyresponsiveness-2014","bibdata":{"abstract":"How responsive are political parties to the issue priorities of voters? While there are numerous studies that examine policy position congruence between parties and voters or government responsiveness, we know little about the extent to which parties adjust their policy priorities to the issue concerns of voters. Following saliency and issue ownership theory, we argue that political parties listen to their voters by emphasizing policy issues in their election manifestos that have been prioritized by citizens. However, in line with second-order election theory, we expect that issue responsiveness varies with the electoral context. To test our theoretical expectations, we generated a novel dataset that combines data on issue attention of political parties from the Comparative Manifesto and the Euromanifesto projects with data on policy priorities of voters from the European Election Studies, the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems and various national election studies. We empirically test our theoretical claims based on a comprehensive analysis of 104 parties from 17 countries competing in 84 national and European elections from 1986 to 2011. Our findings have important implications for political representation in Europe.","author":["Spoon, Jae-Jae","Klüver, Heike"],"author_short":["Spoon, J.","Klüver, H."],"bibtex":"@article{ spoon_parties_2014,\n title = {Do parties respond? {How} electoral context influences party responsiveness},\n volume = {35},\n issn = {02613794},\n doi = {10.1016/j.electstud.2014.04.014},\n abstract = {How responsive are political parties to the issue priorities of voters? While there are numerous studies that examine policy position congruence between parties and voters or government responsiveness, we know little about the extent to which parties adjust their policy priorities to the issue concerns of voters. Following saliency and issue ownership theory, we argue that political parties listen to their voters by emphasizing policy issues in their election manifestos that have been prioritized by citizens. However, in line with second-order election theory, we expect that issue responsiveness varies with the electoral context. To test our theoretical expectations, we generated a novel dataset that combines data on issue attention of political parties from the Comparative Manifesto and the Euromanifesto projects with data on policy priorities of voters from the European Election Studies, the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems and various national election studies. We empirically test our theoretical claims based on a comprehensive analysis of 104 parties from 17 countries competing in 84 national and European elections from 1986 to 2011. Our findings have important implications for political representation in Europe.},\n journal = {Electoral Studies},\n author = {Spoon, Jae-Jae and Klüver, Heike},\n year = {2014},\n note = {641},\n keywords = {Austria, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, the Netherlands},\n pages = {48--60}\n}","bibtype":"article","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2014.04.014","id":"spoon_parties_2014","issn":"02613794","journal":"Electoral Studies","key":"spoon_parties_2014","keywords":"Austria, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, the Netherlands","note":"641","pages":"48--60","title":"Do parties respond? How electoral context influences party responsiveness","type":"article","volume":"35","year":"2014","bibbaseid":"spoon-klver-dopartiesrespondhowelectoralcontextinfluencespartyresponsiveness-2014","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["Austria","Denmark","Estonia","Finland","France","Germany","Great Britain","Hungary","Ireland","Italy","Poland","Portugal","Slovenia","Spain","Sweden","the Netherlands"],"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/groups/340777/items?key=SRDo01KTQBwHm3Va8x5KDwVy&format=bibtex&limit=100","creationDate":"2015-04-01T06:12:29.621Z","downloads":0,"keywords":["austria","denmark","estonia","finland","france","germany","great britain","hungary","ireland","italy","poland","portugal","slovenia","spain","sweden","the netherlands","_substantive_research"],"search_terms":["parties","respond","electoral","context","influences","party","responsiveness","spoon","klüver"],"title":"Do parties respond? How electoral context influences party responsiveness","year":2014,"dataSources":["tmswAMJzXNW5x3MFv"]}