Direct finite element route for design-by-analysis of pressure components. Staat, M., Heitzer, M., Lang, H., & Wirtz, K. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 82(1):61–67, January, 2005. ZSCC: 0000016
Direct finite element route for design-by-analysis of pressure components [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
In the new European standard for unfired pressure vessels, EN 13445-3, there are two approaches for carrying out a Design-by-Analysis that cover both the stress categorization method (Annex C) and the direct route method (Annex B) for a check against global plastic deformation and against progressive plastic deformation. This paper presents the direct route in the language of limit and shakedown analysis. This approach leads to an optimization problem. Its solution with Finite Element Analysis is demonstrated for mechanical and thermal actions. One observation from the examples is that the so-called 3f (3Sm) criterion fails to be a reliable check against progressive plastic deformation. Precise conditions are given, which greatly restrict the applicability of the 3f criterion.
@article{staat_direct_2005,
	title = {Direct finite element route for design-by-analysis of pressure components},
	volume = {82},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	issn = {03080161},
	url = {http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0308016104001073},
	doi = {10.1016/j.ijpvp.2004.04.006},
	abstract = {In the new European standard for unfired pressure vessels, EN 13445-3, there are two approaches for carrying out a Design-by-Analysis that cover both the stress categorization method (Annex C) and the direct route method (Annex B) for a check against global plastic deformation and against progressive plastic deformation. This paper presents the direct route in the language of limit and shakedown analysis. This approach leads to an optimization problem. Its solution with Finite Element Analysis is demonstrated for mechanical and thermal actions. One observation from the examples is that the so-called 3f (3Sm) criterion fails to be a reliable check against progressive plastic deformation. Precise conditions are given, which greatly restrict the applicability of the 3f criterion.},
	number = {1},
	journal = {International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping},
	author = {Staat, Manfred and Heitzer, Michael and Lang, H. and Wirtz, Klaus},
	month = jan,
	year = {2005},
	note = {ZSCC: 0000016},
	keywords = {Alternating plasticity, Design-by-analysis, Progressive plastic deformation, Shakedown analysis, Shakedown criterion},
	pages = {61--67},
}

Downloads: 0