Quantification of the potential impact of nature conservation on ecosystem services supply in the Flemish Region: A cascade modelling approach. Staes, J., Broekx, S., Van Der Biest, K., Vrebos, D., Olivier, B., De Nocker, L., Liekens, I., Poelmans, L., Verheyen, K., Jeroen, P., & Meire, P. Ecosystem Services, 24:124 – 137, Elsevier B.V., 2017. Cited by: 10; All Open Access, Green Open Access![Quantification of the potential impact of nature conservation on ecosystem services supply in the Flemish Region: A cascade modelling approach [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex Ecological networks of protected areas are critical elements to protect biodiversity. To achieve a minimal performance of such networks, measures and investments are necessary for nature restoration and management. The concept of ecosystem service (ES) can provide additional arguments for investments in ecological networks. However, ES delivery processes are embedded in a complex array of ecological processes and there is a need to cope with this complexity in a pragmatic manner. As many assessment studies have already been criticized for using oversimplified indicators, too much pragmatism may foreclose credibility and acceptance of ES assessments. Therefore, a cascade ES modelling approach was developed that incorporated ecological processes, multiple off-site effects, feedbacks and trade-off mechanisms through shared variables. The assessment focused on which services the existing network delivers and how these services are influenced after realization of site specific conservation objectives. © 2017 Elsevier B.V.
@ARTICLE{Staes2017124,
author = {Staes, Jan and Broekx, Steven and Van Der Biest, Katrien and Vrebos, Dirk and Olivier, Beauchard and De Nocker, Leo and Liekens, Inge and Poelmans, Lien and Verheyen, Kris and Jeroen, Panis and Meire, Patrick},
title = {Quantification of the potential impact of nature conservation on ecosystem services supply in the Flemish Region: A cascade modelling approach},
year = {2017},
journal = {Ecosystem Services},
volume = {24},
pages = {124 – 137},
doi = {10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.020},
url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85014002558&doi=10.1016%2fj.ecoser.2017.02.020&partnerID=40&md5=359669b0fec5ee8a1db01317343a7fc0},
affiliations = {Ecosystem Management Research Group (ECOBE), University of Antwerp (Belgium), Universiteitsplein 1, Wilrijk, 2610, Belgium; Environmental Modelling Division, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO-RMA), Boeretang 200, Mol, 2400, Belgium; Forest & Nature Lab (ForNaLab), Ghent University, Department of Forest and Water Management, Geraardsbergse Steenweg 267, Melle-Gontrode, B-9090, Belgium; Agency for Nature and Forest, Koning Albert II laan, Brussels, Belgium; Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ), Wandelaarkaai 7, Oostende, 8400, Belgium},
abstract = {Ecological networks of protected areas are critical elements to protect biodiversity. To achieve a minimal performance of such networks, measures and investments are necessary for nature restoration and management. The concept of ecosystem service (ES) can provide additional arguments for investments in ecological networks. However, ES delivery processes are embedded in a complex array of ecological processes and there is a need to cope with this complexity in a pragmatic manner. As many assessment studies have already been criticized for using oversimplified indicators, too much pragmatism may foreclose credibility and acceptance of ES assessments. Therefore, a cascade ES modelling approach was developed that incorporated ecological processes, multiple off-site effects, feedbacks and trade-off mechanisms through shared variables. The assessment focused on which services the existing network delivers and how these services are influenced after realization of site specific conservation objectives. © 2017 Elsevier B.V.},
author_keywords = {Ecological network; Ecosystem services; Land use change; Modelling; NATURA 2000},
correspondence_address = {J. Staes; Ecosystem Management Research Group (ECOBE), University of Antwerp (Belgium), Wilrijk, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Belgium; email: jan.staes@uantwerpen.be},
publisher = {Elsevier B.V.},
issn = {22120416},
language = {English},
abbrev_source_title = {Ecosyst. Serv.},
type = {Article},
publication_stage = {Final},
source = {Scopus},
note = {Cited by: 10; All Open Access, Green Open Access}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"XWymLDGjJfW2w66E5","bibbaseid":"staes-broekx-vanderbiest-vrebos-olivier-denocker-liekens-poelmans-etal-quantificationofthepotentialimpactofnatureconservationonecosystemservicessupplyintheflemishregionacascademodellingapproach-2017","author_short":["Staes, J.","Broekx, S.","Van Der Biest, K.","Vrebos, D.","Olivier, B.","De Nocker, L.","Liekens, I.","Poelmans, L.","Verheyen, K.","Jeroen, P.","Meire, P."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"Article","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Staes"],"firstnames":["Jan"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Broekx"],"firstnames":["Steven"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Van","Der","Biest"],"firstnames":["Katrien"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Vrebos"],"firstnames":["Dirk"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Olivier"],"firstnames":["Beauchard"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["De","Nocker"],"firstnames":["Leo"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Liekens"],"firstnames":["Inge"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Poelmans"],"firstnames":["Lien"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Verheyen"],"firstnames":["Kris"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Jeroen"],"firstnames":["Panis"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Meire"],"firstnames":["Patrick"],"suffixes":[]}],"title":"Quantification of the potential impact of nature conservation on ecosystem services supply in the Flemish Region: A cascade modelling approach","year":"2017","journal":"Ecosystem Services","volume":"24","pages":"124 – 137","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.020","url":"https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85014002558&doi=10.1016%2fj.ecoser.2017.02.020&partnerID=40&md5=359669b0fec5ee8a1db01317343a7fc0","affiliations":"Ecosystem Management Research Group (ECOBE), University of Antwerp (Belgium), Universiteitsplein 1, Wilrijk, 2610, Belgium; Environmental Modelling Division, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO-RMA), Boeretang 200, Mol, 2400, Belgium; Forest & Nature Lab (ForNaLab), Ghent University, Department of Forest and Water Management, Geraardsbergse Steenweg 267, Melle-Gontrode, B-9090, Belgium; Agency for Nature and Forest, Koning Albert II laan, Brussels, Belgium; Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ), Wandelaarkaai 7, Oostende, 8400, Belgium","abstract":"Ecological networks of protected areas are critical elements to protect biodiversity. To achieve a minimal performance of such networks, measures and investments are necessary for nature restoration and management. The concept of ecosystem service (ES) can provide additional arguments for investments in ecological networks. However, ES delivery processes are embedded in a complex array of ecological processes and there is a need to cope with this complexity in a pragmatic manner. As many assessment studies have already been criticized for using oversimplified indicators, too much pragmatism may foreclose credibility and acceptance of ES assessments. Therefore, a cascade ES modelling approach was developed that incorporated ecological processes, multiple off-site effects, feedbacks and trade-off mechanisms through shared variables. The assessment focused on which services the existing network delivers and how these services are influenced after realization of site specific conservation objectives. © 2017 Elsevier B.V.","author_keywords":"Ecological network; Ecosystem services; Land use change; Modelling; NATURA 2000","correspondence_address":"J. Staes; Ecosystem Management Research Group (ECOBE), University of Antwerp (Belgium), Wilrijk, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Belgium; email: jan.staes@uantwerpen.be","publisher":"Elsevier B.V.","issn":"22120416","language":"English","abbrev_source_title":"Ecosyst. Serv.","publication_stage":"Final","source":"Scopus","note":"Cited by: 10; All Open Access, Green Open Access","bibtex":"@ARTICLE{Staes2017124,\n\tauthor = {Staes, Jan and Broekx, Steven and Van Der Biest, Katrien and Vrebos, Dirk and Olivier, Beauchard and De Nocker, Leo and Liekens, Inge and Poelmans, Lien and Verheyen, Kris and Jeroen, Panis and Meire, Patrick},\n\ttitle = {Quantification of the potential impact of nature conservation on ecosystem services supply in the Flemish Region: A cascade modelling approach},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tjournal = {Ecosystem Services},\n\tvolume = {24},\n\tpages = {124 – 137},\n\tdoi = {10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.020},\n\turl = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85014002558&doi=10.1016%2fj.ecoser.2017.02.020&partnerID=40&md5=359669b0fec5ee8a1db01317343a7fc0},\n\taffiliations = {Ecosystem Management Research Group (ECOBE), University of Antwerp (Belgium), Universiteitsplein 1, Wilrijk, 2610, Belgium; Environmental Modelling Division, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO-RMA), Boeretang 200, Mol, 2400, Belgium; Forest & Nature Lab (ForNaLab), Ghent University, Department of Forest and Water Management, Geraardsbergse Steenweg 267, Melle-Gontrode, B-9090, Belgium; Agency for Nature and Forest, Koning Albert II laan, Brussels, Belgium; Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ), Wandelaarkaai 7, Oostende, 8400, Belgium},\n\tabstract = {Ecological networks of protected areas are critical elements to protect biodiversity. To achieve a minimal performance of such networks, measures and investments are necessary for nature restoration and management. The concept of ecosystem service (ES) can provide additional arguments for investments in ecological networks. However, ES delivery processes are embedded in a complex array of ecological processes and there is a need to cope with this complexity in a pragmatic manner. As many assessment studies have already been criticized for using oversimplified indicators, too much pragmatism may foreclose credibility and acceptance of ES assessments. Therefore, a cascade ES modelling approach was developed that incorporated ecological processes, multiple off-site effects, feedbacks and trade-off mechanisms through shared variables. The assessment focused on which services the existing network delivers and how these services are influenced after realization of site specific conservation objectives. © 2017 Elsevier B.V.},\n\tauthor_keywords = {Ecological network; Ecosystem services; Land use change; Modelling; NATURA 2000},\n\tcorrespondence_address = {J. Staes; Ecosystem Management Research Group (ECOBE), University of Antwerp (Belgium), Wilrijk, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Belgium; email: jan.staes@uantwerpen.be},\n\tpublisher = {Elsevier B.V.},\n\tissn = {22120416},\n\tlanguage = {English},\n\tabbrev_source_title = {Ecosyst. Serv.},\n\ttype = {Article},\n\tpublication_stage = {Final},\n\tsource = {Scopus},\n\tnote = {Cited by: 10; All Open Access, Green Open Access}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Staes, J.","Broekx, S.","Van Der Biest, K.","Vrebos, D.","Olivier, B.","De Nocker, L.","Liekens, I.","Poelmans, L.","Verheyen, K.","Jeroen, P.","Meire, P."],"bibbaseid":"staes-broekx-vanderbiest-vrebos-olivier-denocker-liekens-poelmans-etal-quantificationofthepotentialimpactofnatureconservationonecosystemservicessupplyintheflemishregionacascademodellingapproach-2017","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85014002558&doi=10.1016%2fj.ecoser.2017.02.020&partnerID=40&md5=359669b0fec5ee8a1db01317343a7fc0"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/f/akvPCQYE74MCSypqX/scopus natura 2000.bib","dataSources":["9rFaKnTwou6jRgSF9","KAoky8t7J8sFjdgJH","FKJBwi6LMCkkx9Aj2","jEMMcdj2v9At9Q5md"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["quantification","potential","impact","nature","conservation","ecosystem","services","supply","flemish","region","cascade","modelling","approach","staes","broekx","van der biest","vrebos","olivier","de nocker","liekens","poelmans","verheyen","jeroen","meire"],"title":"Quantification of the potential impact of nature conservation on ecosystem services supply in the Flemish Region: A cascade modelling approach","year":2017}