@article{staley_budding_1980,
	title = {Budding and prosthecate bacteria from freshwater habitats of various trophic states},
	volume = {5},
	issn = {0095-3628, 1432-184X},
	url = {http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02020332},
	doi = {10.1007/BF02020332},
	abstract = {Budding and prosthecate bacteria were enumerated in spring and summer by viable counting procedures in several freshwater habitats in Australia including oligotrophic lakes, a mesotrophic lake, and eutrophic ponds.Caulobacter spp. were the most numerous type encountered. They were present in the highest concentrations (exceeding 1000/ml) in the mesotrophic lake during the summer. Their proportion to total viable heterotrophic bacteria was also highest (35.1 to 37.7) in this habitat. From 17 to 330/mlCaulobacter spp. were counted in the eutrophic habitats where their proportion to total viable numbers was less than 1.0\%. In the oligotrophic lakes they varied from 5 to 23/ml and comprised greater than 5\% of the total viable count.Hyphomicrobium- like bacteria were also numerous in the mesotrophic lake and in one oligotrophic lake during the summer sampling period.Ancalomicrobium spp. occurred in high concentrations (130/ml) in the mesotrophic lake. Budding bacteria of thePlanctomyces-Pasteuria group were most numerous in the eutrophic habitats where as many as 240/ml were counted; their proportion to total heterotrophs remained relatively constant regardless of trophic state, however. A similar pattern was observed withProsthecobacter spp.},
	language = {en},
	number = {4},
	urldate = {2013-03-20TZ},
	journal = {Microbial Ecology},
	author = {Staley, J. T. and Marshall, K. C. and Skerman, V. B. D.},
	month = dec,
	year = {1980},
	keywords = {Ecology, Geoecology/Natural Processes, Nature Conservation, microbiology},
	pages = {245--251}
}

{"_id":"RGAWLY85aGuaBBqGq","bibbaseid":"staley-marshall-skerman-buddingandprosthecatebacteriafromfreshwaterhabitatsofvarioustrophicstates-1980","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2017-04-04T08:13:36.186Z","title":"Budding and prosthecate bacteria from freshwater habitats of various trophic states","author_short":["Staley, J. T.","Marshall, K. C.","Skerman, V. B. D."],"year":1980,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero/velocityhughes","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Budding and prosthecate bacteria from freshwater habitats of various trophic states","volume":"5","issn":"0095-3628, 1432-184X","url":"http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02020332","doi":"10.1007/BF02020332","abstract":"Budding and prosthecate bacteria were enumerated in spring and summer by viable counting procedures in several freshwater habitats in Australia including oligotrophic lakes, a mesotrophic lake, and eutrophic ponds.Caulobacter spp. were the most numerous type encountered. They were present in the highest concentrations (exceeding 1000/ml) in the mesotrophic lake during the summer. Their proportion to total viable heterotrophic bacteria was also highest (35.1 to 37.7) in this habitat. From 17 to 330/mlCaulobacter spp. were counted in the eutrophic habitats where their proportion to total viable numbers was less than 1.0%. In the oligotrophic lakes they varied from 5 to 23/ml and comprised greater than 5% of the total viable count.Hyphomicrobium- like bacteria were also numerous in the mesotrophic lake and in one oligotrophic lake during the summer sampling period.Ancalomicrobium spp. occurred in high concentrations (130/ml) in the mesotrophic lake. Budding bacteria of thePlanctomyces-Pasteuria group were most numerous in the eutrophic habitats where as many as 240/ml were counted; their proportion to total heterotrophs remained relatively constant regardless of trophic state, however. A similar pattern was observed withProsthecobacter spp.","language":"en","number":"4","urldate":"2013-03-20TZ","journal":"Microbial Ecology","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Staley"],"firstnames":["J.","T."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Marshall"],"firstnames":["K.","C."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Skerman"],"firstnames":["V.","B.","D."],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"December","year":"1980","keywords":"Ecology, Geoecology/Natural Processes, Nature Conservation, microbiology","pages":"245--251","bibtex":"@article{staley_budding_1980,\n\ttitle = {Budding and prosthecate bacteria from freshwater habitats of various trophic states},\n\tvolume = {5},\n\tissn = {0095-3628, 1432-184X},\n\turl = {http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02020332},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/BF02020332},\n\tabstract = {Budding and prosthecate bacteria were enumerated in spring and summer by viable counting procedures in several freshwater habitats in Australia including oligotrophic lakes, a mesotrophic lake, and eutrophic ponds.Caulobacter spp. were the most numerous type encountered. They were present in the highest concentrations (exceeding 1000/ml) in the mesotrophic lake during the summer. Their proportion to total viable heterotrophic bacteria was also highest (35.1 to 37.7) in this habitat. From 17 to 330/mlCaulobacter spp. were counted in the eutrophic habitats where their proportion to total viable numbers was less than 1.0\\%. In the oligotrophic lakes they varied from 5 to 23/ml and comprised greater than 5\\% of the total viable count.Hyphomicrobium- like bacteria were also numerous in the mesotrophic lake and in one oligotrophic lake during the summer sampling period.Ancalomicrobium spp. occurred in high concentrations (130/ml) in the mesotrophic lake. Budding bacteria of thePlanctomyces-Pasteuria group were most numerous in the eutrophic habitats where as many as 240/ml were counted; their proportion to total heterotrophs remained relatively constant regardless of trophic state, however. A similar pattern was observed withProsthecobacter spp.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {4},\n\turldate = {2013-03-20TZ},\n\tjournal = {Microbial Ecology},\n\tauthor = {Staley, J. T. and Marshall, K. C. and Skerman, V. B. D.},\n\tmonth = dec,\n\tyear = {1980},\n\tkeywords = {Ecology, Geoecology/Natural Processes, Nature Conservation, microbiology},\n\tpages = {245--251}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Staley, J. T.","Marshall, K. C.","Skerman, V. B. D."],"key":"staley_budding_1980","id":"staley_budding_1980","bibbaseid":"staley-marshall-skerman-buddingandprosthecatebacteriafromfreshwaterhabitatsofvarioustrophicstates-1980","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02020332"},"keyword":["Ecology","Geoecology/Natural Processes","Nature Conservation","microbiology"],"downloads":0},"search_terms":["budding","prosthecate","bacteria","freshwater","habitats","various","trophic","states","staley","marshall","skerman"],"keywords":["ecology","geoecology/natural processes","nature conservation","microbiology"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["QQyXj7M8pdnbq89aP"]}