Authorship: Why Not Just Toss a Coin?. Strange, K. American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, 295(3):C567-C575, 2008. doi abstract bibtex If you are reading this commentary, the title probably irked your professional sensibilities. That's good. During 32 years of publishing, I've experienced two authorship disputes. Both of these problems have demonstrated to me that there is a disturbing and pervasive lack of understanding of what authorship on scientific papers means, of the responsibilities that it conveys, and of how it is determined. The goal of this article is to discuss the ethics and responsibility of authorship and to raise awareness of an issue that is fundamental to the health of our profession. I provide an overview of the extensive discussion of authorship that has been ongoing within the scientific community for over three decades, use personal experiences with authorship disputes to illustrate aspects of this discussion, and provide recommendations on how to resolve and prevent authorship problems. It is my hope that this commentary sparks debate and action that will help to minimize abusive and damaging authorship practices.
@article{strangeAuthorshipWhyNot2008,
title = {Authorship: Why Not Just Toss a Coin?},
author = {Strange, Kevin},
year = {2008},
volume = {295},
pages = {C567-C575},
issn = {1522-1563},
doi = {10.1152/ajpcell.00208.2008},
abstract = {If you are reading this commentary, the title probably irked your professional sensibilities. That's good. During 32 years of publishing, I've experienced two authorship disputes. Both of these problems have demonstrated to me that there is a disturbing and pervasive lack of understanding of what authorship on scientific papers means, of the responsibilities that it conveys, and of how it is determined. The goal of this article is to discuss the ethics and responsibility of authorship and to raise awareness of an issue that is fundamental to the health of our profession. I provide an overview of the extensive discussion of authorship that has been ongoing within the scientific community for over three decades, use personal experiences with authorship disputes to illustrate aspects of this discussion, and provide recommendations on how to resolve and prevent authorship problems. It is my hope that this commentary sparks debate and action that will help to minimize abusive and damaging authorship practices.},
journal = {American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology},
keywords = {~INRMM-MiD:z-32Y4YE95,authorship,ethics,moral-rights,research-management,science-ethics,scientific-misconduct},
lccn = {INRMM-MiD:z-32Y4YE95},
number = {3}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"KXqBqZDusLqpBtp2M","bibbaseid":"strange-authorshipwhynotjusttossacoin-2008","authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Strange, K."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Authorship: Why Not Just Toss a Coin?","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Strange"],"firstnames":["Kevin"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2008","volume":"295","pages":"C567-C575","issn":"1522-1563","doi":"10.1152/ajpcell.00208.2008","abstract":"If you are reading this commentary, the title probably irked your professional sensibilities. That's good. During 32 years of publishing, I've experienced two authorship disputes. Both of these problems have demonstrated to me that there is a disturbing and pervasive lack of understanding of what authorship on scientific papers means, of the responsibilities that it conveys, and of how it is determined. The goal of this article is to discuss the ethics and responsibility of authorship and to raise awareness of an issue that is fundamental to the health of our profession. I provide an overview of the extensive discussion of authorship that has been ongoing within the scientific community for over three decades, use personal experiences with authorship disputes to illustrate aspects of this discussion, and provide recommendations on how to resolve and prevent authorship problems. It is my hope that this commentary sparks debate and action that will help to minimize abusive and damaging authorship practices.","journal":"American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology","keywords":"~INRMM-MiD:z-32Y4YE95,authorship,ethics,moral-rights,research-management,science-ethics,scientific-misconduct","lccn":"INRMM-MiD:z-32Y4YE95","number":"3","bibtex":"@article{strangeAuthorshipWhyNot2008,\n title = {Authorship: Why Not Just Toss a Coin?},\n author = {Strange, Kevin},\n year = {2008},\n volume = {295},\n pages = {C567-C575},\n issn = {1522-1563},\n doi = {10.1152/ajpcell.00208.2008},\n abstract = {If you are reading this commentary, the title probably irked your professional sensibilities. That's good. During 32 years of publishing, I've experienced two authorship disputes. Both of these problems have demonstrated to me that there is a disturbing and pervasive lack of understanding of what authorship on scientific papers means, of the responsibilities that it conveys, and of how it is determined. The goal of this article is to discuss the ethics and responsibility of authorship and to raise awareness of an issue that is fundamental to the health of our profession. I provide an overview of the extensive discussion of authorship that has been ongoing within the scientific community for over three decades, use personal experiences with authorship disputes to illustrate aspects of this discussion, and provide recommendations on how to resolve and prevent authorship problems. It is my hope that this commentary sparks debate and action that will help to minimize abusive and damaging authorship practices.},\n journal = {American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology},\n keywords = {~INRMM-MiD:z-32Y4YE95,authorship,ethics,moral-rights,research-management,science-ethics,scientific-misconduct},\n lccn = {INRMM-MiD:z-32Y4YE95},\n number = {3}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Strange, K."],"key":"strangeAuthorshipWhyNot2008","id":"strangeAuthorshipWhyNot2008","bibbaseid":"strange-authorshipwhynotjusttossacoin-2008","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["~INRMM-MiD:z-32Y4YE95","authorship","ethics","moral-rights","research-management","science-ethics","scientific-misconduct"],"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://sharefast.me/php/download.php?id=zOUKvA&token=29","creationDate":"2020-07-03T22:46:29.005Z","downloads":0,"keywords":["~inrmm-mid:z-32y4ye95","authorship","ethics","moral-rights","research-management","science-ethics","scientific-misconduct"],"search_terms":["authorship","toss","coin","strange"],"title":"Authorship: Why Not Just Toss a Coin?","year":2008,"dataSources":["5S2zj2hKW8TWTkuMq"]}