Regional Variation and Syntactic Derivation of Low-frequency need-passives on Twitter. Strelluf, C. Journal of English Linguistics, 50(1):39–71, March, 2022. Publisher: SAGE Publications IncPaper doi abstract bibtex This paper examines constructions formed by the verb need taking a passivized complement. While previous dialectological, sociolinguistic, and micro-syntactic analyses have focused primarily on the past-participle complement (need+ED) as a regional syntactic variable, this study expands the purview of need-passives to examine gerund-participle (need+ING) and infinitival (need+TO) complements. It also looks beyond purported need+ED regions to examine need-passive variation in Englishes spoken around the world. Data from Twitter confirm previous findings that need+ED is a productive feature of the US Midland, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and Tyneside, England. However, tweets also show that need+ING is produced disproportionately frequently in England and Wales. These results reveal a more complex pattern of need-passive variation in global Englishes than has previously been reported. Additionally, a transitive construction formed with need as a matrix verb is examined and found to co-vary regionally with need+ING. Syntactic analyses of tweets reveal similarities in the ways that need+ED and need+ING vary with need+TO. These findings lead to a proposed syntactic analysis that need+ED and need+ING share the same derivational structure. More generally, the work argues for greater attention in linguistic research to low-frequency features.
@article{strelluf_regional_2022,
title = {Regional {Variation} and {Syntactic} {Derivation} of {Low}-frequency need-passives on {Twitter}},
volume = {50},
issn = {0075-4242},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/00754242211066971},
doi = {10.1177/00754242211066971},
abstract = {This paper examines constructions formed by the verb need taking a passivized complement. While previous dialectological, sociolinguistic, and micro-syntactic analyses have focused primarily on the past-participle complement (need+ED) as a regional syntactic variable, this study expands the purview of need-passives to examine gerund-participle (need+ING) and infinitival (need+TO) complements. It also looks beyond purported need+ED regions to examine need-passive variation in Englishes spoken around the world. Data from Twitter confirm previous findings that need+ED is a productive feature of the US Midland, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and Tyneside, England. However, tweets also show that need+ING is produced disproportionately frequently in England and Wales. These results reveal a more complex pattern of need-passive variation in global Englishes than has previously been reported. Additionally, a transitive construction formed with need as a matrix verb is examined and found to co-vary regionally with need+ING. Syntactic analyses of tweets reveal similarities in the ways that need+ED and need+ING vary with need+TO. These findings lead to a proposed syntactic analysis that need+ED and need+ING share the same derivational structure. More generally, the work argues for greater attention in linguistic research to low-frequency features.},
language = {en},
number = {1},
urldate = {2024-06-14},
journal = {Journal of English Linguistics},
author = {Strelluf, Christopher},
month = mar,
year = {2022},
note = {Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc},
pages = {39--71},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"M6SgfPcJppHxdvDRv","bibbaseid":"strelluf-regionalvariationandsyntacticderivationoflowfrequencyneedpassivesontwitter-2022","author_short":["Strelluf, C."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Regional Variation and Syntactic Derivation of Low-frequency need-passives on Twitter","volume":"50","issn":"0075-4242","url":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00754242211066971","doi":"10.1177/00754242211066971","abstract":"This paper examines constructions formed by the verb need taking a passivized complement. While previous dialectological, sociolinguistic, and micro-syntactic analyses have focused primarily on the past-participle complement (need+ED) as a regional syntactic variable, this study expands the purview of need-passives to examine gerund-participle (need+ING) and infinitival (need+TO) complements. It also looks beyond purported need+ED regions to examine need-passive variation in Englishes spoken around the world. Data from Twitter confirm previous findings that need+ED is a productive feature of the US Midland, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and Tyneside, England. However, tweets also show that need+ING is produced disproportionately frequently in England and Wales. These results reveal a more complex pattern of need-passive variation in global Englishes than has previously been reported. Additionally, a transitive construction formed with need as a matrix verb is examined and found to co-vary regionally with need+ING. Syntactic analyses of tweets reveal similarities in the ways that need+ED and need+ING vary with need+TO. These findings lead to a proposed syntactic analysis that need+ED and need+ING share the same derivational structure. More generally, the work argues for greater attention in linguistic research to low-frequency features.","language":"en","number":"1","urldate":"2024-06-14","journal":"Journal of English Linguistics","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Strelluf"],"firstnames":["Christopher"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"March","year":"2022","note":"Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc","pages":"39–71","bibtex":"@article{strelluf_regional_2022,\n\ttitle = {Regional {Variation} and {Syntactic} {Derivation} of {Low}-frequency need-passives on {Twitter}},\n\tvolume = {50},\n\tissn = {0075-4242},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1177/00754242211066971},\n\tdoi = {10.1177/00754242211066971},\n\tabstract = {This paper examines constructions formed by the verb need taking a passivized complement. While previous dialectological, sociolinguistic, and micro-syntactic analyses have focused primarily on the past-participle complement (need+ED) as a regional syntactic variable, this study expands the purview of need-passives to examine gerund-participle (need+ING) and infinitival (need+TO) complements. It also looks beyond purported need+ED regions to examine need-passive variation in Englishes spoken around the world. Data from Twitter confirm previous findings that need+ED is a productive feature of the US Midland, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and Tyneside, England. However, tweets also show that need+ING is produced disproportionately frequently in England and Wales. These results reveal a more complex pattern of need-passive variation in global Englishes than has previously been reported. Additionally, a transitive construction formed with need as a matrix verb is examined and found to co-vary regionally with need+ING. Syntactic analyses of tweets reveal similarities in the ways that need+ED and need+ING vary with need+TO. These findings lead to a proposed syntactic analysis that need+ED and need+ING share the same derivational structure. More generally, the work argues for greater attention in linguistic research to low-frequency features.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2024-06-14},\n\tjournal = {Journal of English Linguistics},\n\tauthor = {Strelluf, Christopher},\n\tmonth = mar,\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tnote = {Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc},\n\tpages = {39--71},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Strelluf, C."],"key":"strelluf_regional_2022","id":"strelluf_regional_2022","bibbaseid":"strelluf-regionalvariationandsyntacticderivationoflowfrequencyneedpassivesontwitter-2022","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00754242211066971"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/users/4976940/collections/BCCIUVF3/items?key=HB5ooAZGCiqh7e2wvqkMNOn0&format=bibtex&limit=100","dataSources":["hjiFAomt2Te5QwgSG","PhSqtaEPb99MieGcY"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["regional","variation","syntactic","derivation","low","frequency","need","passives","twitter","strelluf"],"title":"Regional Variation and Syntactic Derivation of Low-frequency need-passives on Twitter","year":2022}