The role of the Matthew effect in science. Strevens, M. Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 37(2):159--170, June, 2006. Paper doi abstract bibtex Robert Merton observed that better known scientists tend to get more credit than less well known scientists for the same achievements; he called this the Matthew effect. Scientists themselves, even those eminent researchers who enjoy its benefits, regard the effect as a pathology: it results, they believe, in a misallocation of credit. If so, why do scientists continue to bestow credit in the manner described by the effect? This paper advocates an explanation of the effect on which it turns out to allocate credit fairly after all, while at the same time making sense of scientists' opinions to the contrary.
@article{strevens_role_2006,
title = {The role of the {Matthew} effect in science},
volume = {37},
issn = {0039-3681},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V70-4K07FXD-2/2/23e598b93c48ab674a24d74ee9deee6b},
doi = {10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.07.009},
abstract = {Robert Merton observed that better known scientists tend to get more credit than less well known scientists for the same achievements; he called this the Matthew effect. Scientists themselves, even those eminent researchers who enjoy its benefits, regard the effect as a pathology: it results, they believe, in a misallocation of credit. If so, why do scientists continue to bestow credit in the manner described by the effect? This paper advocates an explanation of the effect on which it turns out to allocate credit fairly after all, while at the same time making sense of scientists' opinions to the contrary.},
number = {2},
urldate = {2011-02-10},
journal = {Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A},
author = {Strevens, Michael},
month = jun,
year = {2006},
keywords = {Harriet Zuckerman, Matthew effect, Robert Merton, Scientific norms, Scientific reward system, Social structure of science},
pages = {159--170},
file = {ScienceDirect Full Text PDF:files/32644/Strevens - 2006 - The role of the Matthew effect in science.pdf:application/pdf;ScienceDirect Snapshot:files/32633/science.html:text/html}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"LeT2YXfNy9XoS3jYq","bibbaseid":"strevens-theroleofthemattheweffectinscience-2006","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2016-09-09T06:27:29.478Z","title":"The role of the Matthew effect in science","author_short":["Strevens, M."],"year":2006,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://www.sfu.ca/~howlett/howlett16.bib","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"The role of the Matthew effect in science","volume":"37","issn":"0039-3681","url":"http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V70-4K07FXD-2/2/23e598b93c48ab674a24d74ee9deee6b","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.07.009","abstract":"Robert Merton observed that better known scientists tend to get more credit than less well known scientists for the same achievements; he called this the Matthew effect. Scientists themselves, even those eminent researchers who enjoy its benefits, regard the effect as a pathology: it results, they believe, in a misallocation of credit. If so, why do scientists continue to bestow credit in the manner described by the effect? This paper advocates an explanation of the effect on which it turns out to allocate credit fairly after all, while at the same time making sense of scientists' opinions to the contrary.","number":"2","urldate":"2011-02-10","journal":"Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Strevens"],"firstnames":["Michael"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"June","year":"2006","keywords":"Harriet Zuckerman, Matthew effect, Robert Merton, Scientific norms, Scientific reward system, Social structure of science","pages":"159--170","file":"ScienceDirect Full Text PDF:files/32644/Strevens - 2006 - The role of the Matthew effect in science.pdf:application/pdf;ScienceDirect Snapshot:files/32633/science.html:text/html","bibtex":"@article{strevens_role_2006,\n\ttitle = {The role of the {Matthew} effect in science},\n\tvolume = {37},\n\tissn = {0039-3681},\n\turl = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V70-4K07FXD-2/2/23e598b93c48ab674a24d74ee9deee6b},\n\tdoi = {10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.07.009},\n\tabstract = {Robert Merton observed that better known scientists tend to get more credit than less well known scientists for the same achievements; he called this the Matthew effect. Scientists themselves, even those eminent researchers who enjoy its benefits, regard the effect as a pathology: it results, they believe, in a misallocation of credit. If so, why do scientists continue to bestow credit in the manner described by the effect? This paper advocates an explanation of the effect on which it turns out to allocate credit fairly after all, while at the same time making sense of scientists' opinions to the contrary.},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2011-02-10},\n\tjournal = {Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A},\n\tauthor = {Strevens, Michael},\n\tmonth = jun,\n\tyear = {2006},\n\tkeywords = {Harriet Zuckerman, Matthew effect, Robert Merton, Scientific norms, Scientific reward system, Social structure of science},\n\tpages = {159--170},\n\tfile = {ScienceDirect Full Text PDF:files/32644/Strevens - 2006 - The role of the Matthew effect in science.pdf:application/pdf;ScienceDirect Snapshot:files/32633/science.html:text/html}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Strevens, M."],"key":"strevens_role_2006","id":"strevens_role_2006","bibbaseid":"strevens-theroleofthemattheweffectinscience-2006","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V70-4K07FXD-2/2/23e598b93c48ab674a24d74ee9deee6b"},"keyword":["Harriet Zuckerman","Matthew effect","Robert Merton","Scientific norms","Scientific reward system","Social structure of science"],"downloads":0},"search_terms":["role","matthew","effect","science","strevens"],"keywords":["harriet zuckerman","matthew effect","robert merton","scientific norms","scientific reward system","social structure of science"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["Bn7xRaKMY43f7hFwh"]}