@article{
 title = {The CLARION cognitive architecture: Extending cognitive modeling to social simulation},
 type = {article},
 year = {2006},
 identifiers = {[object Object]},
 pages = {79-99},
 websites = {http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511610721},
 id = {82fc2685-ba6f-304e-8be3-097b87aa8a4d},
 created = {2015-12-08T18:29:31.000Z},
 file_attached = {true},
 profile_id = {9e66d949-92d0-3e13-8d8c-2d6d8d76d924},
 group_id = {48a053e8-b494-3bde-aa03-1071d9e56815},
 last_modified = {2015-12-08T18:31:19.000Z},
 read = {false},
 starred = {false},
 authored = {false},
 confirmed = {true},
 hidden = {false},
 citation_key = {Sun2006},
 abstract = {This chapter presents an overview of a relatively recent cognitive architecture for modeling cognitive processes of individual cognitive agents (in a psychological sense) (see Sun et al., 1998, 2001; Sun, 2002). We will start with a look at some general ideas underlying this cognitive architecture as well as the relevance of these ideas to social simulation. To tackle a host of issues arising from computational cognitive modeling that are not adequately addressed by many other existent cognitive architectures, such as the implicit-explicit interaction, the cognitivemetacognitive interaction, and the cognitive-motivational interaction, CLARION, a modularly structured cognitive architecture, has been developed (Sun, 2002; Sun et al., 1998, 2001). Overall, CLARION is an integrative model. It consists of a number of functional subsystems (for example, the action-centered subsystem, the metacognitive subsystem, and the motivational subsystem). It also has a dual representational structure implicit and explicit representations being in two separate components in each subsystem. Thus far, CLARION has been successful in capturing a variety of cognitive processes in a variety of task domains based on this division of modules (Sun et al., 2002). See Figure 4.1 for a sketch of the architecture. A key assumption of CLARION, which has been argued for amply before (see Sun et al., 1998, 2001; Sun, 2002), is the dichotomy of implicit and explicit cognition. Generally speaking, implicit processes are less accessible and more holistic, whereas explicit processes are more accessiblee crisp (Reber, 1989; Sun, 2002). This dichotomy is closely related to some other well-known dichotomies in cognitive science: the dichotomy of symbolic versus subsymbolic processing, the dichotomy of conceptual versus subconceptual processing, and so on (Smolensky, 1988; Sun, 1994).},
 bibtype = {article},
 author = {Sun, Ron},
 journal = {Cognition and MultiAgent Interaction}
}

{"_id":"iXWxkYRzsKyoBDJm7","bibbaseid":"sun-theclarioncognitivearchitectureextendingcognitivemodelingtosocialsimulation-2006","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2016-10-11T17:05:15.274Z","title":"The CLARION cognitive architecture: Extending cognitive modeling to social simulation","author_short":["Sun, R."],"year":2006,"bibtype":"article","biburl":null,"bibdata":{"title":"The CLARION cognitive architecture: Extending cognitive modeling to social simulation","type":"article","year":"2006","identifiers":"[object Object]","pages":"79-99","websites":"http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511610721","id":"82fc2685-ba6f-304e-8be3-097b87aa8a4d","created":"2015-12-08T18:29:31.000Z","file_attached":"true","profile_id":"9e66d949-92d0-3e13-8d8c-2d6d8d76d924","group_id":"48a053e8-b494-3bde-aa03-1071d9e56815","last_modified":"2015-12-08T18:31:19.000Z","read":false,"starred":false,"authored":false,"confirmed":"true","hidden":false,"citation_key":"Sun2006","abstract":"This chapter presents an overview of a relatively recent cognitive architecture for modeling cognitive processes of individual cognitive agents (in a psychological sense) (see Sun et al., 1998, 2001; Sun, 2002). We will start with a look at some general ideas underlying this cognitive architecture as well as the relevance of these ideas to social simulation. To tackle a host of issues arising from computational cognitive modeling that are not adequately addressed by many other existent cognitive architectures, such as the implicit-explicit interaction, the cognitivemetacognitive interaction, and the cognitive-motivational interaction, CLARION, a modularly structured cognitive architecture, has been developed (Sun, 2002; Sun et al., 1998, 2001). Overall, CLARION is an integrative model. It consists of a number of functional subsystems (for example, the action-centered subsystem, the metacognitive subsystem, and the motivational subsystem). It also has a dual representational structure implicit and explicit representations being in two separate components in each subsystem. Thus far, CLARION has been successful in capturing a variety of cognitive processes in a variety of task domains based on this division of modules (Sun et al., 2002). See Figure 4.1 for a sketch of the architecture. A key assumption of CLARION, which has been argued for amply before (see Sun et al., 1998, 2001; Sun, 2002), is the dichotomy of implicit and explicit cognition. Generally speaking, implicit processes are less accessible and more holistic, whereas explicit processes are more accessiblee crisp (Reber, 1989; Sun, 2002). This dichotomy is closely related to some other well-known dichotomies in cognitive science: the dichotomy of symbolic versus subsymbolic processing, the dichotomy of conceptual versus subconceptual processing, and so on (Smolensky, 1988; Sun, 1994).","bibtype":"article","author":"Sun, Ron","journal":"Cognition and MultiAgent Interaction","bibtex":"@article{\n title = {The CLARION cognitive architecture: Extending cognitive modeling to social simulation},\n type = {article},\n year = {2006},\n identifiers = {[object Object]},\n pages = {79-99},\n websites = {http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511610721},\n id = {82fc2685-ba6f-304e-8be3-097b87aa8a4d},\n created = {2015-12-08T18:29:31.000Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {9e66d949-92d0-3e13-8d8c-2d6d8d76d924},\n group_id = {48a053e8-b494-3bde-aa03-1071d9e56815},\n last_modified = {2015-12-08T18:31:19.000Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n citation_key = {Sun2006},\n abstract = {This chapter presents an overview of a relatively recent cognitive architecture for modeling cognitive processes of individual cognitive agents (in a psychological sense) (see Sun et al., 1998, 2001; Sun, 2002). We will start with a look at some general ideas underlying this cognitive architecture as well as the relevance of these ideas to social simulation. To tackle a host of issues arising from computational cognitive modeling that are not adequately addressed by many other existent cognitive architectures, such as the implicit-explicit interaction, the cognitivemetacognitive interaction, and the cognitive-motivational interaction, CLARION, a modularly structured cognitive architecture, has been developed (Sun, 2002; Sun et al., 1998, 2001). Overall, CLARION is an integrative model. It consists of a number of functional subsystems (for example, the action-centered subsystem, the metacognitive subsystem, and the motivational subsystem). It also has a dual representational structure implicit and explicit representations being in two separate components in each subsystem. Thus far, CLARION has been successful in capturing a variety of cognitive processes in a variety of task domains based on this division of modules (Sun et al., 2002). See Figure 4.1 for a sketch of the architecture. A key assumption of CLARION, which has been argued for amply before (see Sun et al., 1998, 2001; Sun, 2002), is the dichotomy of implicit and explicit cognition. Generally speaking, implicit processes are less accessible and more holistic, whereas explicit processes are more accessiblee crisp (Reber, 1989; Sun, 2002). This dichotomy is closely related to some other well-known dichotomies in cognitive science: the dichotomy of symbolic versus subsymbolic processing, the dichotomy of conceptual versus subconceptual processing, and so on (Smolensky, 1988; Sun, 1994).},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Sun, Ron},\n journal = {Cognition and MultiAgent Interaction}\n}","author_short":["Sun, R."],"urls":{"Paper":"http://bibbase.org/service/mendeley/9e66d949-92d0-3e13-8d8c-2d6d8d76d924/file/220ee7f5-c442-34d9-3c6c-845f9288b49c/2006-The_CLARION_cognitive_architecture_Extending_cognitive_modeling_to_social_simulation.pdf.pdf","Website":"http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511610721"},"bibbaseid":"sun-theclarioncognitivearchitectureextendingcognitivemodelingtosocialsimulation-2006","role":"author","downloads":0},"search_terms":["clarion","cognitive","architecture","extending","cognitive","modeling","social","simulation","sun"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":[]}