Blaming Reasonable Wrongdoers. Talbert, M. Res Publica, 2023. Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media B.V. Type: Article
Blaming Reasonable Wrongdoers [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
‘Reasonable wrongdoers’ reasonably, but wrongly, take themselves to act permissibly. Many responsibility theorists assume that since we cannot reasonably expect these wrongdoers to behave differently, they are not blameworthy. These theorists impose a Reasonable Expectation Condition on blame. I argue that reasonable wrongdoers may be blameworthy. It is true that we often excuse reasonable wrongdoers, but sometimes this is because we do not regard their behavior as objectionable in a way that makes blame appropriate. As such, these cases do not support the proposition that wrongdoers are excused just because they reasonably take themselves to act permissibly. For the relevant support, we should consider cases in which a reasonable wrongdoer’s behavior is unambiguously objectionable by our moral lights. But here again we fail to find decisive support for the Reasonable Expectation Condition since it is not obvious—independent of a prior commitment to this condition—that such wrongdoers are not blameworthy. After laying out the above argument, as well as offering a positive account of why reasonable wrongdoers are sometimes blameworthy, I turn to consider objections. The most important of these is that it is simply unfair to blame those who reasonably take themselves to behave unobjectionably and who cannot be expected to behave otherwise. © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
@article{talbert_blaming_2023,
	title = {Blaming {Reasonable} {Wrongdoers}},
	issn = {13564765},
	url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85174956951&doi=10.1007%2fs11158-023-09644-w&partnerID=40&md5=e2ec1f2e54571543d124bc8a619e705f},
	doi = {10.1007/s11158-023-09644-w},
	abstract = {‘Reasonable wrongdoers’ reasonably, but wrongly, take themselves to act permissibly. Many responsibility theorists assume that since we cannot reasonably expect these wrongdoers to behave differently, they are not blameworthy. These theorists impose a Reasonable Expectation Condition on blame. I argue that reasonable wrongdoers may be blameworthy. It is true that we often excuse reasonable wrongdoers, but sometimes this is because we do not regard their behavior as objectionable in a way that makes blame appropriate. As such, these cases do not support the proposition that wrongdoers are excused just because they reasonably take themselves to act permissibly. For the relevant support, we should consider cases in which a reasonable wrongdoer’s behavior is unambiguously objectionable by our moral lights. But here again we fail to find decisive support for the Reasonable Expectation Condition since it is not obvious—independent of a prior commitment to this condition—that such wrongdoers are not blameworthy. After laying out the above argument, as well as offering a positive account of why reasonable wrongdoers are sometimes blameworthy, I turn to consider objections. The most important of these is that it is simply unfair to blame those who reasonably take themselves to behave unobjectionably and who cannot be expected to behave otherwise. © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.},
	language = {English},
	journal = {Res Publica},
	author = {Talbert, Matthew},
	year = {2023},
	note = {Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
Type: Article},
}

Downloads: 0