@article{the_ccdss_systematic_review_team_computerized_2011-1,
	title = {Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management: {A} decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review},
	volume = {6},
	issn = {1748-5908},
	shorttitle = {Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management},
	url = {http://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1748-5908-6-92},
	doi = {10.1186/1748-5908-6-92},
	abstract = {Background: The use of computerized clinical decision support systems (CCDSSs) may improve chronic disease management, which requires recurrent visits to multiple health professionals, ongoing disease and treatment monitoring, and patient behavior modification. The objective of this review was to determine if CCDSSs improve the processes of chronic care (such as diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of disease) and associated patient outcomes (such as effects on biomarkers and clinical exacerbations).
Methods: We conducted a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Ovid’s EBM Reviews database, Inspec, and reference lists for potentially eligible articles published up to January 2010. We included randomized controlled trials that compared the use of CCDSSs to usual practice or nonCCDSS controls. Trials were eligible if at least one component of the CCDSS was designed to support chronic disease management. We considered studies ‘positive’ if they showed a statistically significant improvement in at least 50\% of relevant outcomes.
Results: Of 55 included trials, 87\% (n = 48) measured system impact on the process of care and 52\% (n = 25) of those demonstrated statistically significant improvements. Sixty-five percent (36/55) of trials measured impact on, typically, non-major (surrogate) patient outcomes, and 31\% (n = 11) of those demonstrated benefits. Factors of interest to decision makers, such as cost, user satisfaction, system interface and feature sets, unique design and deployment characteristics, and effects on user workflow were rarely investigated or reported.
Conclusions: A small majority (just over half) of CCDSSs improved care processes in chronic disease management and some improved patient health. Policy makers, healthcare administrators, and practitioners should be aware that the evidence of CCDSS effectiveness is limited, especially with respect to the small number and size of studies measuring patient outcomes.},
	language = {en},
	number = {1},
	urldate = {2019-02-14TZ},
	journal = {Implementation Science},
	author = {{the CCDSS Systematic Review Team} and Roshanov, Pavel S and Misra, Shikha and Gerstein, Hertzel C and Garg, Amit X and Sebaldt, Rolf J and Mackay, Jean A and Weise-Kelly, Lorraine and Navarro, Tamara and Wilczynski, Nancy L and Haynes, R Brian},
	month = dec,
	year = {2011}
}

{"_id":"bDSzSceyL3DzHxDap","bibbaseid":"theccdsssystematicreviewteam-roshanov-misra-gerstein-garg-sebaldt-mackay-weisekelly-etal-computerizedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsforchronicdiseasemanagementadecisionmakerresearcherpartnershipsystematicreview-2011","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2019-03-07T14:08:40.293Z","title":"Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management: A decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review","author_short":["the CCDSS Systematic Review Team","Roshanov, P. S","Misra, S.","Gerstein, H. C","Garg, A. X","Sebaldt, R. J","Mackay, J. A","Weise-Kelly, L.","Navarro, T.","Wilczynski, N. L","Haynes, R B."],"year":2011,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/Robert Laurine","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management: A decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review","volume":"6","issn":"1748-5908","shorttitle":"Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management","url":"http://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1748-5908-6-92","doi":"10.1186/1748-5908-6-92","abstract":"Background: The use of computerized clinical decision support systems (CCDSSs) may improve chronic disease management, which requires recurrent visits to multiple health professionals, ongoing disease and treatment monitoring, and patient behavior modification. The objective of this review was to determine if CCDSSs improve the processes of chronic care (such as diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of disease) and associated patient outcomes (such as effects on biomarkers and clinical exacerbations). Methods: We conducted a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Ovid’s EBM Reviews database, Inspec, and reference lists for potentially eligible articles published up to January 2010. We included randomized controlled trials that compared the use of CCDSSs to usual practice or nonCCDSS controls. Trials were eligible if at least one component of the CCDSS was designed to support chronic disease management. We considered studies ‘positive’ if they showed a statistically significant improvement in at least 50% of relevant outcomes. Results: Of 55 included trials, 87% (n = 48) measured system impact on the process of care and 52% (n = 25) of those demonstrated statistically significant improvements. Sixty-five percent (36/55) of trials measured impact on, typically, non-major (surrogate) patient outcomes, and 31% (n = 11) of those demonstrated benefits. Factors of interest to decision makers, such as cost, user satisfaction, system interface and feature sets, unique design and deployment characteristics, and effects on user workflow were rarely investigated or reported. Conclusions: A small majority (just over half) of CCDSSs improved care processes in chronic disease management and some improved patient health. Policy makers, healthcare administrators, and practitioners should be aware that the evidence of CCDSS effectiveness is limited, especially with respect to the small number and size of studies measuring patient outcomes.","language":"en","number":"1","urldate":"2019-02-14TZ","journal":"Implementation Science","author":[{"firstnames":[],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["the CCDSS Systematic Review Team"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Roshanov"],"firstnames":["Pavel","S"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Misra"],"firstnames":["Shikha"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Gerstein"],"firstnames":["Hertzel","C"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Garg"],"firstnames":["Amit","X"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Sebaldt"],"firstnames":["Rolf","J"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Mackay"],"firstnames":["Jean","A"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Weise-Kelly"],"firstnames":["Lorraine"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Navarro"],"firstnames":["Tamara"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Wilczynski"],"firstnames":["Nancy","L"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Haynes"],"firstnames":["R","Brian"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"December","year":"2011","bibtex":"@article{the_ccdss_systematic_review_team_computerized_2011-1,\n\ttitle = {Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management: {A} decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review},\n\tvolume = {6},\n\tissn = {1748-5908},\n\tshorttitle = {Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management},\n\turl = {http://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1748-5908-6-92},\n\tdoi = {10.1186/1748-5908-6-92},\n\tabstract = {Background: The use of computerized clinical decision support systems (CCDSSs) may improve chronic disease management, which requires recurrent visits to multiple health professionals, ongoing disease and treatment monitoring, and patient behavior modification. The objective of this review was to determine if CCDSSs improve the processes of chronic care (such as diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of disease) and associated patient outcomes (such as effects on biomarkers and clinical exacerbations).\nMethods: We conducted a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Ovid’s EBM Reviews database, Inspec, and reference lists for potentially eligible articles published up to January 2010. We included randomized controlled trials that compared the use of CCDSSs to usual practice or nonCCDSS controls. Trials were eligible if at least one component of the CCDSS was designed to support chronic disease management. We considered studies ‘positive’ if they showed a statistically significant improvement in at least 50\\% of relevant outcomes.\nResults: Of 55 included trials, 87\\% (n = 48) measured system impact on the process of care and 52\\% (n = 25) of those demonstrated statistically significant improvements. Sixty-five percent (36/55) of trials measured impact on, typically, non-major (surrogate) patient outcomes, and 31\\% (n = 11) of those demonstrated benefits. Factors of interest to decision makers, such as cost, user satisfaction, system interface and feature sets, unique design and deployment characteristics, and effects on user workflow were rarely investigated or reported.\nConclusions: A small majority (just over half) of CCDSSs improved care processes in chronic disease management and some improved patient health. Policy makers, healthcare administrators, and practitioners should be aware that the evidence of CCDSS effectiveness is limited, especially with respect to the small number and size of studies measuring patient outcomes.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2019-02-14TZ},\n\tjournal = {Implementation Science},\n\tauthor = {{the CCDSS Systematic Review Team} and Roshanov, Pavel S and Misra, Shikha and Gerstein, Hertzel C and Garg, Amit X and Sebaldt, Rolf J and Mackay, Jean A and Weise-Kelly, Lorraine and Navarro, Tamara and Wilczynski, Nancy L and Haynes, R Brian},\n\tmonth = dec,\n\tyear = {2011}\n}\n\n","author_short":["the CCDSS Systematic Review Team","Roshanov, P. S","Misra, S.","Gerstein, H. C","Garg, A. X","Sebaldt, R. J","Mackay, J. A","Weise-Kelly, L.","Navarro, T.","Wilczynski, N. L","Haynes, R B."],"key":"the_ccdss_systematic_review_team_computerized_2011-1","id":"the_ccdss_systematic_review_team_computerized_2011-1","bibbaseid":"theccdsssystematicreviewteam-roshanov-misra-gerstein-garg-sebaldt-mackay-weisekelly-etal-computerizedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsforchronicdiseasemanagementadecisionmakerresearcherpartnershipsystematicreview-2011","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1748-5908-6-92"},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["computerized","clinical","decision","support","systems","chronic","disease","management","decision","maker","researcher","partnership","systematic","review","the ccdss systematic review team","roshanov","misra","gerstein","garg","sebaldt","mackay","weise-kelly","navarro","wilczynski","haynes"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["yP2f7ZTqzqGzG39kW"]}