Reflections on Trusting Trust Revisited. Thompson, K. 46(6):112. doi abstract bibtex I thank the ACM for this award. I can't help but feel that I am receiving this honor for timing and serendip- ity as much as technical merit. UNIX1 swept into popu- larity with an industry-wide change from central main- frames to autonomous minis. I suspect that Daniel Bob- row [1] would be here instead of me if he could not afford a PDP-10 and had had to "settle" for a PDP-11. Moreover, the current state of UNIX is the result of the labors of a large number of people. There is an old adage, "Dance with the one that brought you," which means that I should talk about UNIX. I have not worked on mainstream UNIX in many years, yet I continue to get undeserved credit for the work of others. Therefore, I am not going to talk about UNIX, but I want to thank everyone who has contrib- uted. That brings me to Dennis Ritchie. Our collaboration has been a thing of beauty. In the ten years that we have worked together, I can recall only one case of miscoordination of work. On that occasion, I discovered that we both had written the same 20-line assembly language program. I compared the sources and was as- tounded to find that they matched character-for-char- acter. The result of our work together has been far greater than the work that we each contributed. I am a programmer. On my 1040 form, that is what I put down as my occupation. As a programmer, I write programs. I would like to present to you the cutest program I ever wrote. I will do this in three stages and try to bring it together at the end.
@article{thompsonReflectionsTrustingTrust1995,
title = {Reflections on Trusting Trust Revisited},
volume = {46},
issn = {00010782},
doi = {10.1145/777313.777347},
abstract = {I thank the ACM for this award. I can't help but feel that I am receiving this honor for timing and serendip- ity as much as technical merit. UNIX1 swept into popu- larity with an industry-wide change from central main- frames to autonomous minis. I suspect that Daniel Bob- row [1] would be here instead of me if he could not afford a PDP-10 and had had to "settle" for a PDP-11. Moreover, the current state of UNIX is the result of the labors of a large number of people. There is an old adage, "Dance with the one that brought you," which means that I should talk about UNIX. I have not worked on mainstream UNIX in many years, yet I continue to get undeserved credit for the work of others. Therefore, I am not going to talk about UNIX, but I want to thank everyone who has contrib- uted. That brings me to Dennis Ritchie. Our collaboration has been a thing of beauty. In the ten years that we have worked together, I can recall only one case of miscoordination of work. On that occasion, I discovered that we both had written the same 20-line assembly language program. I compared the sources and was as- tounded to find that they matched character-for-char- acter. The result of our work together has been far greater than the work that we each contributed. I am a programmer. On my 1040 form, that is what I put down as my occupation. As a programmer, I write programs. I would like to present to you the cutest program I ever wrote. I will do this in three stages and try to bring it together at the end.},
number = {6},
journaltitle = {Communications of the ACM},
date = {1995},
pages = {112},
author = {Thompson, Ken},
file = {/home/dimitri/Nextcloud/Zotero/storage/IQBKUKA7/Thompson - 2003 - Reflections on trusting trust revisited.pdf}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"rtPPqLpxCwtuyC3zH","bibbaseid":"thompson-reflectionsontrustingtrustrevisited","authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Thompson, K."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Reflections on Trusting Trust Revisited","volume":"46","issn":"00010782","doi":"10.1145/777313.777347","abstract":"I thank the ACM for this award. I can't help but feel that I am receiving this honor for timing and serendip- ity as much as technical merit. UNIX1 swept into popu- larity with an industry-wide change from central main- frames to autonomous minis. I suspect that Daniel Bob- row [1] would be here instead of me if he could not afford a PDP-10 and had had to \"settle\" for a PDP-11. Moreover, the current state of UNIX is the result of the labors of a large number of people. There is an old adage, \"Dance with the one that brought you,\" which means that I should talk about UNIX. I have not worked on mainstream UNIX in many years, yet I continue to get undeserved credit for the work of others. Therefore, I am not going to talk about UNIX, but I want to thank everyone who has contrib- uted. That brings me to Dennis Ritchie. Our collaboration has been a thing of beauty. In the ten years that we have worked together, I can recall only one case of miscoordination of work. On that occasion, I discovered that we both had written the same 20-line assembly language program. I compared the sources and was as- tounded to find that they matched character-for-char- acter. The result of our work together has been far greater than the work that we each contributed. I am a programmer. On my 1040 form, that is what I put down as my occupation. As a programmer, I write programs. I would like to present to you the cutest program I ever wrote. I will do this in three stages and try to bring it together at the end.","number":"6","journaltitle":"Communications of the ACM","date":"1995","pages":"112","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Thompson"],"firstnames":["Ken"],"suffixes":[]}],"file":"/home/dimitri/Nextcloud/Zotero/storage/IQBKUKA7/Thompson - 2003 - Reflections on trusting trust revisited.pdf","bibtex":"@article{thompsonReflectionsTrustingTrust1995,\n title = {Reflections on Trusting Trust Revisited},\n volume = {46},\n issn = {00010782},\n doi = {10.1145/777313.777347},\n abstract = {I thank the ACM for this award. I can't help but feel that I am receiving this honor for timing and serendip- ity as much as technical merit. UNIX1 swept into popu- larity with an industry-wide change from central main- frames to autonomous minis. I suspect that Daniel Bob- row [1] would be here instead of me if he could not afford a PDP-10 and had had to \"settle\" for a PDP-11. Moreover, the current state of UNIX is the result of the labors of a large number of people. There is an old adage, \"Dance with the one that brought you,\" which means that I should talk about UNIX. I have not worked on mainstream UNIX in many years, yet I continue to get undeserved credit for the work of others. Therefore, I am not going to talk about UNIX, but I want to thank everyone who has contrib- uted. That brings me to Dennis Ritchie. Our collaboration has been a thing of beauty. In the ten years that we have worked together, I can recall only one case of miscoordination of work. On that occasion, I discovered that we both had written the same 20-line assembly language program. I compared the sources and was as- tounded to find that they matched character-for-char- acter. The result of our work together has been far greater than the work that we each contributed. I am a programmer. On my 1040 form, that is what I put down as my occupation. As a programmer, I write programs. I would like to present to you the cutest program I ever wrote. I will do this in three stages and try to bring it together at the end.},\n number = {6},\n journaltitle = {Communications of the ACM},\n date = {1995},\n pages = {112},\n author = {Thompson, Ken},\n file = {/home/dimitri/Nextcloud/Zotero/storage/IQBKUKA7/Thompson - 2003 - Reflections on trusting trust revisited.pdf}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Thompson, K."],"key":"thompsonReflectionsTrustingTrust1995","id":"thompsonReflectionsTrustingTrust1995","bibbaseid":"thompson-reflectionsontrustingtrustrevisited","role":"author","urls":{},"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dlozeve/newblog/master/bib/all.bib","creationDate":"2020-01-08T20:39:39.057Z","downloads":0,"keywords":[],"search_terms":["reflections","trusting","trust","revisited","thompson"],"title":"Reflections on Trusting Trust Revisited","year":null,"dataSources":["3XqdvqRE7zuX4cm8m"]}