Testing Galaxy Quenching Theories with Scatter in the Stellar to Halo Mass Relation. Tinker, J. L. arXiv:1607.06099 [astro-ph], July, 2016. arXiv: 1607.06099
Testing Galaxy Quenching Theories with Scatter in the Stellar to Halo Mass Relation [link]Paper  abstract   bibtex   
We use the scatter in the stellar-to-halo mass relation to constrain galaxy evolution models. If the efficiency of converting accreted baryons into stars varies with time, halos of the same present-day mass but different formation histories will have different z=0 galaxy stellar mass. This is one of the sources of scatter in stellar mass at fixed halo mass, \${\textbackslash}sigma_\{{\textbackslash}log M{\textbackslash}ast\}\$. For massive halos that undergo rapid quenching of star formation at z\textasciitilde2, different mechanisms that trigger this quenching yield different values of \${\textbackslash}sigma_\{{\textbackslash}log M{\textbackslash}ast\}\$. We use this framework to test various models in which quenching begins after a galaxy crosses a threshold in one of the following physical quantities: redshift, halo mass, stellar mass, and stellar-to-halo mass ratio. Our model is highly idealized, with other sources of scatter likely to arise as more physics is included. Thus, our test is whether a model can produce scatter lower than observational bounds, leaving room for other sources. Recent measurements find \${\textbackslash}sigma_\{{\textbackslash}log M{\textbackslash}ast\}=0.16\$ dex for 10\textasciicircum11 Msol galaxies. Under the assumption that the threshold is constant with time, such a low value of \${\textbackslash}sigma_\{{\textbackslash}log M{\textbackslash}ast\}\$ rules out all of these models with the exception of quenching by a stellar mass treshold. Most physical quantities, such as metallicity, will increase scatter if they are uncorrelated with halo formation history. Thus, to decrease the scatter of a given model, galaxy properties would correlate tightly with formation history, creating testable predictions for their clustering. Understanding why \${\textbackslash}sigma_\{{\textbackslash}log M{\textbackslash}ast\}\$ is so small may be key to understanding the physics of galaxy formation.
@article{tinker_testing_2016,
	title = {Testing {Galaxy} {Quenching} {Theories} with {Scatter} in the {Stellar} to {Halo} {Mass} {Relation}},
	url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.06099},
	abstract = {We use the scatter in the stellar-to-halo mass relation to constrain galaxy evolution models. If the efficiency of converting accreted baryons into stars varies with time, halos of the same present-day mass but different formation histories will have different z=0 galaxy stellar mass. This is one of the sources of scatter in stellar mass at fixed halo mass, \${\textbackslash}sigma\_\{{\textbackslash}log M{\textbackslash}ast\}\$. For massive halos that undergo rapid quenching of star formation at z{\textasciitilde}2, different mechanisms that trigger this quenching yield different values of \${\textbackslash}sigma\_\{{\textbackslash}log M{\textbackslash}ast\}\$. We use this framework to test various models in which quenching begins after a galaxy crosses a threshold in one of the following physical quantities: redshift, halo mass, stellar mass, and stellar-to-halo mass ratio. Our model is highly idealized, with other sources of scatter likely to arise as more physics is included. Thus, our test is whether a model can produce scatter lower than observational bounds, leaving room for other sources. Recent measurements find \${\textbackslash}sigma\_\{{\textbackslash}log M{\textbackslash}ast\}=0.16\$ dex for 10{\textasciicircum}11 Msol galaxies. Under the assumption that the threshold is constant with time, such a low value of \${\textbackslash}sigma\_\{{\textbackslash}log M{\textbackslash}ast\}\$ rules out all of these models with the exception of quenching by a stellar mass treshold. Most physical quantities, such as metallicity, will increase scatter if they are uncorrelated with halo formation history. Thus, to decrease the scatter of a given model, galaxy properties would correlate tightly with formation history, creating testable predictions for their clustering. Understanding why \${\textbackslash}sigma\_\{{\textbackslash}log M{\textbackslash}ast\}\$ is so small may be key to understanding the physics of galaxy formation.},
	urldate = {2016-09-09},
	journal = {arXiv:1607.06099 [astro-ph]},
	author = {Tinker, Jeremy L.},
	month = jul,
	year = {2016},
	note = {arXiv: 1607.06099},
	keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},
}

Downloads: 0