Hidden Dangers of a Citation Culture. Todd, P. A. & Ladle, R. J. 8:13–16.
Paper doi abstract bibtex The influence of the journal impact factor and the effect of a 'citation culture' on science and scientists have been discussed extensively (Lawrence 2007; Curr Biol 17:R583-585). Neverthe- less, many still believe that the number of citations a paper receives provides some measure of its quality. This belief may be unfounded, however, as there are 2 substantial areas of error that can distort a citation count or any metric based on a citation count. One is the deliberate manipulation of the system by scientists trying to ensure the highest possible number of cites to their papers; this has been examined elsewhere (Lawrence 2003; Nature 422:259-261). The second area of inaccuracy is inherent to how papers are cited, indexed and searched for. It is this latter, lesser known, source of error that we will investigate here.
@article{toddHiddenDangersCitation2008,
title = {Hidden Dangers of a Citation Culture},
author = {Todd, P. A. and Ladle, R. J.},
date = {2008-06},
journaltitle = {Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics},
volume = {8},
pages = {13--16},
issn = {1863-5415},
doi = {10.3354/esep00091},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00091},
abstract = {The influence of the journal impact factor and the effect of a 'citation culture' on science and scientists have been discussed extensively (Lawrence 2007; Curr Biol 17:R583-585). Neverthe- less, many still believe that the number of citations a paper receives provides some measure of its quality. This belief may be unfounded, however, as there are 2 substantial areas of error that can distort a citation count or any metric based on a citation count. One is the deliberate manipulation of the system by scientists trying to ensure the highest possible number of cites to their papers; this has been examined elsewhere (Lawrence 2003; Nature 422:259-261). The second area of inaccuracy is inherent to how papers are cited, indexed and searched for. It is this latter, lesser known, source of error that we will investigate here.},
keywords = {*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-7801587,citation-metrics,errors,publication-errors,scientific-communication}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"ERPniBZRatEdxHqCH","bibbaseid":"todd-ladle-hiddendangersofacitationculture","authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Todd, P. A.","Ladle, R. J."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Hidden Dangers of a Citation Culture","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Todd"],"firstnames":["P.","A."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Ladle"],"firstnames":["R.","J."],"suffixes":[]}],"date":"2008-06","journaltitle":"Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics","volume":"8","pages":"13–16","issn":"1863-5415","doi":"10.3354/esep00091","url":"https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00091","abstract":"The influence of the journal impact factor and the effect of a 'citation culture' on science and scientists have been discussed extensively (Lawrence 2007; Curr Biol 17:R583-585). Neverthe- less, many still believe that the number of citations a paper receives provides some measure of its quality. This belief may be unfounded, however, as there are 2 substantial areas of error that can distort a citation count or any metric based on a citation count. One is the deliberate manipulation of the system by scientists trying to ensure the highest possible number of cites to their papers; this has been examined elsewhere (Lawrence 2003; Nature 422:259-261). The second area of inaccuracy is inherent to how papers are cited, indexed and searched for. It is this latter, lesser known, source of error that we will investigate here.","keywords":"*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-7801587,citation-metrics,errors,publication-errors,scientific-communication","bibtex":"@article{toddHiddenDangersCitation2008,\n title = {Hidden Dangers of a Citation Culture},\n author = {Todd, P. A. and Ladle, R. J.},\n date = {2008-06},\n journaltitle = {Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics},\n volume = {8},\n pages = {13--16},\n issn = {1863-5415},\n doi = {10.3354/esep00091},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00091},\n abstract = {The influence of the journal impact factor and the effect of a 'citation culture' on science and scientists have been discussed extensively (Lawrence 2007; Curr Biol 17:R583-585). Neverthe- less, many still believe that the number of citations a paper receives provides some measure of its quality. This belief may be unfounded, however, as there are 2 substantial areas of error that can distort a citation count or any metric based on a citation count. One is the deliberate manipulation of the system by scientists trying to ensure the highest possible number of cites to their papers; this has been examined elsewhere (Lawrence 2003; Nature 422:259-261). The second area of inaccuracy is inherent to how papers are cited, indexed and searched for. It is this latter, lesser known, source of error that we will investigate here.},\n keywords = {*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-7801587,citation-metrics,errors,publication-errors,scientific-communication}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Todd, P. A.","Ladle, R. J."],"key":"toddHiddenDangersCitation2008","id":"toddHiddenDangersCitation2008","bibbaseid":"todd-ladle-hiddendangersofacitationculture","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00091"},"keyword":["*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM","~INRMM-MiD:c-7801587","citation-metrics","errors","publication-errors","scientific-communication"],"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://tmpfiles.org/dl/58794/INRMM.bib","creationDate":"2020-07-02T22:41:31.232Z","downloads":0,"keywords":["*imported-from-citeulike-inrmm","~inrmm-mid:c-7801587","citation-metrics","errors","publication-errors","scientific-communication"],"search_terms":["hidden","dangers","citation","culture","todd","ladle"],"title":"Hidden Dangers of a Citation Culture","year":null,"dataSources":["DXuKbcZTirdigFKPF"]}