The con is on: Leveraging standards to combat research misconduct and ensure research integrity. Turner, D. M Information Services and Use, 45(1-2):66–74, May, 2025.
The con is on: Leveraging standards to combat research misconduct and ensure research integrity [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
The proliferation of paper mills and unethical practices within the scientific community poses a significant threat to research integrity. The extent of this problem across the entire industry is recognized and yet is ambiguous, making it imperative for publishers to implement scalable solutions. Metadata, XML tagging, and industry standards offer a structured approach to scrutinizing journal articles on a large scale, empowering publishers to proactively identify potential integrity issues. This article, based upon a presentation at the 2024 NISO Plus Global conference, delves into the reasons behind the challenges and proposes ideas to make integrity checks more effective for publishing operations. It also promotes the importance of finding and remediating potential abuses early in the process to prevent further problems. Using available standards in concert with information from organizations such as ORCID, Ringgold, the Research Organization Registry (ROR), Crossref, and NISO, this article highlights powerful ways by which publishers can find and address crucial red flags before publication or peer review.
@article{turner_con_2025,
	title = {The con is on: {Leveraging} standards to combat research misconduct and ensure research integrity},
	volume = {45},
	issn = {0167-5265, 1875-8789},
	shorttitle = {The con is on},
	url = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/18758789251341614},
	doi = {10.1177/18758789251341614},
	abstract = {The proliferation of paper mills and unethical practices within the scientific community poses a significant threat to research integrity. The extent of this problem across the entire industry is recognized and yet is ambiguous, making it imperative for publishers to implement scalable solutions. Metadata, XML tagging, and industry standards offer a structured approach to scrutinizing journal articles on a large scale, empowering publishers to proactively identify potential integrity issues. This article, based upon a presentation at the 2024 NISO Plus Global conference, delves into the reasons behind the challenges and proposes ideas to make integrity checks more effective for publishing operations. It also promotes the importance of finding and remediating potential abuses early in the process to prevent further problems. Using available standards in concert with information from organizations such as ORCID, Ringgold, the Research Organization Registry (ROR), Crossref, and NISO, this article highlights powerful ways by which publishers can find and address crucial red flags before publication or peer review.},
	language = {en},
	number = {1-2},
	urldate = {2025-08-04},
	journal = {Information Services and Use},
	author = {Turner, David M},
	month = may,
	year = {2025},
	pages = {66--74},
}

Downloads: 0