Dialogue and Constitutional Duty. Tushnet, M. Technical Report ID 2026555, Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY, March, 2012. Paper abstract bibtex The concept of dialogue has become a central feature in contemporary thinking about constitutional review. Dialogues occur between courts and legislatures over
@techreport{tushnet_dialogue_2012,
address = {Rochester, NY},
type = {{SSRN} {Scholarly} {Paper}},
title = {Dialogue and {Constitutional} {Duty}},
url = {https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2026555},
abstract = {The concept of dialogue has become a central feature in contemporary thinking about constitutional review. Dialogues occur between courts and legislatures over},
number = {ID 2026555},
urldate = {2017-05-26},
institution = {Social Science Research Network},
author = {Tushnet, Mark},
month = mar,
year = {2012},
keywords = {0.Discussed in Workshop, judicial rhetoric},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"eue8GMQrWECjBz2Mc","bibbaseid":"tushnet-dialogueandconstitutionalduty-2012","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2017-06-06T14:23:39.203Z","title":"Dialogue and Constitutional Duty","author_short":["Tushnet, M."],"year":2012,"bibtype":"techreport","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero-group/odellcampbell/1132825","bibdata":{"bibtype":"techreport","type":"SSRN Scholarly Paper","address":"Rochester, NY","title":"Dialogue and Constitutional Duty","url":"https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2026555","abstract":"The concept of dialogue has become a central feature in contemporary thinking about constitutional review. Dialogues occur between courts and legislatures over","number":"ID 2026555","urldate":"2017-05-26","institution":"Social Science Research Network","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Tushnet"],"firstnames":["Mark"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"March","year":"2012","keywords":"0.Discussed in Workshop, judicial rhetoric","bibtex":"@techreport{tushnet_dialogue_2012,\n\taddress = {Rochester, NY},\n\ttype = {{SSRN} {Scholarly} {Paper}},\n\ttitle = {Dialogue and {Constitutional} {Duty}},\n\turl = {https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2026555},\n\tabstract = {The concept of dialogue has become a central feature in contemporary thinking about constitutional review. Dialogues occur between courts and legislatures over},\n\tnumber = {ID 2026555},\n\turldate = {2017-05-26},\n\tinstitution = {Social Science Research Network},\n\tauthor = {Tushnet, Mark},\n\tmonth = mar,\n\tyear = {2012},\n\tkeywords = {0.Discussed in Workshop, judicial rhetoric},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Tushnet, M."],"key":"tushnet_dialogue_2012","id":"tushnet_dialogue_2012","bibbaseid":"tushnet-dialogueandconstitutionalduty-2012","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2026555"},"keyword":["0.Discussed in Workshop","judicial rhetoric"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0,"html":""},"search_terms":["dialogue","constitutional","duty","tushnet"],"keywords":["0.discussed in workshop","judicial rhetoric"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["q8n7JfHoJmHYyvnMR","RK5bzmTK8hKbmqQSC"]}