H-Index Manipulation by Merging Articles: Models, Theory, and Experiments. van Bevern, R., Komusiewicz, C., Niedermeier, R., Sorge, M., & Walsh, T. Artificial Intelligence, 240:19–35, 2016.
Preprint
Code doi abstract bibtex An author's profile on Google Scholar consists of indexed articles and associated data, such as the number of citations and the H-index. The author is allowed to merge articles, which may affect the H-index. We analyze the (parameterized) computational complexity of maximizing the H-index using article merges. Herein, to model realistic manipulation scenarios, we define a compatibility graph whose edges correspond to plausible merges. Moreover, we consider several different measures for computing the citation count of a merged article. For the measure used by Google Scholar, we give an algorithm that maximizes the H-index in linear time if the compatibility graph has constant-size connected components. In contrast, if we allow to merge arbitrary articles (that is, for arbitrary compatibility graphs), then already increasing the H-index by one is NP-hard. Experiments on Google Scholar profiles of AI researchers show that the H-index can be manipulated substantially only if one merges articles with highly dissimilar titles.
@article{BKN+16,
title = {H-Index Manipulation by Merging Articles: Models,
Theory, and Experiments},
author = {René van Bevern and Christian Komusiewicz and Rolf
Niedermeier and Manuel Sorge and Toby Walsh},
url_Preprint = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.5498},
url_Code = {http://fpt.akt.tu-berlin.de/hindex/},
year = 2016,
date = {2016-11-01},
journal = {Artificial Intelligence},
volume = 240,
pages = {19--35},
abstract = {An author's profile on Google Scholar consists of
indexed articles and associated data, such as the
number of citations and the H-index. The author is
allowed to merge articles, which may affect the
H-index. We analyze the (parameterized)
computational complexity of maximizing the H-index
using article merges. Herein, to model realistic
manipulation scenarios, we define a compatibility
graph whose edges correspond to plausible
merges. Moreover, we consider several different
measures for computing the citation count of a
merged article. For the measure used by Google
Scholar, we give an algorithm that maximizes the
H-index in linear time if the compatibility graph
has constant-size connected components. In contrast,
if we allow to merge arbitrary articles (that is,
for arbitrary compatibility graphs), then already
increasing the H-index by one is
NP-hard. Experiments on Google Scholar profiles of
AI researchers show that the H-index can be
manipulated substantially only if one merges
articles with highly dissimilar titles.},
doi = {10.1016/j.artint.2016.08.001},
keywords = {network analysis, parameterized complexity}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"G7RwvXyFKhCKmR8Di","bibbaseid":"vanbevern-komusiewicz-niedermeier-sorge-walsh-hindexmanipulationbymergingarticlesmodelstheoryandexperiments-2016","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2016-08-14T04:37:13.712Z","title":"H-Index Manipulation by Merging Articles: Models, Theory, and Experiments","author_short":["van Bevern, R.","Komusiewicz, C.","Niedermeier, R.","Sorge, M.","Walsh, T."],"year":2016,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://rvb.su/rvb.bib","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"H-Index Manipulation by Merging Articles: Models, Theory, and Experiments","author":[{"firstnames":["René"],"propositions":["van"],"lastnames":["Bevern"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Christian"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Komusiewicz"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Rolf"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Niedermeier"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Manuel"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Sorge"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Toby"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Walsh"],"suffixes":[]}],"url_preprint":"http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.5498","url_code":"http://fpt.akt.tu-berlin.de/hindex/","year":"2016","date":"2016-11-01","journal":"Artificial Intelligence","volume":"240","pages":"19–35","abstract":"An author's profile on Google Scholar consists of indexed articles and associated data, such as the number of citations and the H-index. The author is allowed to merge articles, which may affect the H-index. We analyze the (parameterized) computational complexity of maximizing the H-index using article merges. Herein, to model realistic manipulation scenarios, we define a compatibility graph whose edges correspond to plausible merges. Moreover, we consider several different measures for computing the citation count of a merged article. For the measure used by Google Scholar, we give an algorithm that maximizes the H-index in linear time if the compatibility graph has constant-size connected components. In contrast, if we allow to merge arbitrary articles (that is, for arbitrary compatibility graphs), then already increasing the H-index by one is NP-hard. Experiments on Google Scholar profiles of AI researchers show that the H-index can be manipulated substantially only if one merges articles with highly dissimilar titles.","doi":"10.1016/j.artint.2016.08.001","keywords":"network analysis, parameterized complexity","bibtex":"@article{BKN+16,\n title =\t {H-Index Manipulation by Merging Articles: Models,\n Theory, and Experiments},\n author =\t {René van Bevern and Christian Komusiewicz and Rolf\n Niedermeier and Manuel Sorge and Toby Walsh},\n url_Preprint = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.5498},\n url_Code =\t {http://fpt.akt.tu-berlin.de/hindex/},\n year =\t 2016,\n date =\t {2016-11-01},\n journal =\t {Artificial Intelligence},\n volume =\t 240,\n pages =\t {19--35},\n abstract =\t {An author's profile on Google Scholar consists of\n indexed articles and associated data, such as the\n number of citations and the H-index. The author is\n allowed to merge articles, which may affect the\n H-index. We analyze the (parameterized)\n computational complexity of maximizing the H-index\n using article merges. Herein, to model realistic\n manipulation scenarios, we define a compatibility\n graph whose edges correspond to plausible\n merges. Moreover, we consider several different\n measures for computing the citation count of a\n merged article. For the measure used by Google\n Scholar, we give an algorithm that maximizes the\n H-index in linear time if the compatibility graph\n has constant-size connected components. In contrast,\n if we allow to merge arbitrary articles (that is,\n for arbitrary compatibility graphs), then already\n increasing the H-index by one is\n NP-hard. Experiments on Google Scholar profiles of\n AI researchers show that the H-index can be\n manipulated substantially only if one merges\n articles with highly dissimilar titles.},\n doi =\t\t {10.1016/j.artint.2016.08.001},\n keywords =\t {network analysis, parameterized complexity}\n}\n\n","author_short":["van Bevern, R.","Komusiewicz, C.","Niedermeier, R.","Sorge, M.","Walsh, T."],"key":"BKN+16","id":"BKN+16","bibbaseid":"vanbevern-komusiewicz-niedermeier-sorge-walsh-hindexmanipulationbymergingarticlesmodelstheoryandexperiments-2016","role":"author","urls":{" preprint":"http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.5498"," code":"http://fpt.akt.tu-berlin.de/hindex/"},"keyword":["network analysis","parameterized complexity"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{"van bevern, r":"https://rvb.su/"}},"downloads":0,"html":""},"search_terms":["index","manipulation","merging","articles","models","theory","experiments","van bevern","komusiewicz","niedermeier","sorge","walsh"],"keywords":["network analysis","parameterized complexity"],"authorIDs":["2fwXJtKDCNhaSNr5s"],"dataSources":["SMwzc9Bzq5Np5ikev","G5GefJqqu2DtnCZXz"]}