H-Index Manipulation by Merging Articles: Models, Theory, and Experiments. van Bevern, R., Komusiewicz, C., Niedermeier, R., Sorge, M., & Walsh, T. Artificial Intelligence, 240:19–35, 2016.
H-Index Manipulation by Merging Articles: Models, Theory, and Experiments [link]Preprint  H-Index Manipulation by Merging Articles: Models, Theory, and Experiments [link]Code  doi  abstract   bibtex   
An author's profile on Google Scholar consists of indexed articles and associated data, such as the number of citations and the H-index. The author is allowed to merge articles, which may affect the H-index. We analyze the (parameterized) computational complexity of maximizing the H-index using article merges. Herein, to model realistic manipulation scenarios, we define a compatibility graph whose edges correspond to plausible merges. Moreover, we consider several different measures for computing the citation count of a merged article. For the measure used by Google Scholar, we give an algorithm that maximizes the H-index in linear time if the compatibility graph has constant-size connected components. In contrast, if we allow to merge arbitrary articles (that is, for arbitrary compatibility graphs), then already increasing the H-index by one is NP-hard. Experiments on Google Scholar profiles of AI researchers show that the H-index can be manipulated substantially only if one merges articles with highly dissimilar titles.
@article{BKN+16,
  title =	 {H-Index Manipulation by Merging Articles: Models,
                  Theory, and Experiments},
  author =	 {René van Bevern and Christian Komusiewicz and Rolf
                  Niedermeier and Manuel Sorge and Toby Walsh},
  url_Preprint = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.5498},
  url_Code =	 {http://fpt.akt.tu-berlin.de/hindex/},
  year =	 2016,
  date =	 {2016-11-01},
  journal =	 {Artificial Intelligence},
  volume =	 240,
  pages =	 {19--35},
  abstract =	 {An author's profile on Google Scholar consists of
                  indexed articles and associated data, such as the
                  number of citations and the H-index. The author is
                  allowed to merge articles, which may affect the
                  H-index. We analyze the (parameterized)
                  computational complexity of maximizing the H-index
                  using article merges. Herein, to model realistic
                  manipulation scenarios, we define a compatibility
                  graph whose edges correspond to plausible
                  merges. Moreover, we consider several different
                  measures for computing the citation count of a
                  merged article. For the measure used by Google
                  Scholar, we give an algorithm that maximizes the
                  H-index in linear time if the compatibility graph
                  has constant-size connected components. In contrast,
                  if we allow to merge arbitrary articles (that is,
                  for arbitrary compatibility graphs), then already
                  increasing the H-index by one is
                  NP-hard. Experiments on Google Scholar profiles of
                  AI researchers show that the H-index can be
                  manipulated substantially only if one merges
                  articles with highly dissimilar titles.},
  doi =		 {10.1016/j.artint.2016.08.001},
  keywords =	 {network analysis, parameterized complexity}
}

Downloads: 0