A Blooming and Buzzing Confusion: Buffon, Reimarus, and Kant on Animal Cognition. Van den Berg, H. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 72:1–9, 2018. doi abstract bibtex Kant’s views on animals have received much attention in recent years. According to some, Kant attributed the capacity for objective perceptual awareness to non-human animals, even though he denied that they have concepts. This position is difficult to square with a conceptualist reading of Kant, according to which objective perceptual awareness requires concepts. Others take Kant’s views on animals to imply that the mental life of animals is a blooming, buzzing confusion. In this article I provide a historical reconstruction of Kant’s views on animals, relating them to eighteenth-century debates on animal cognition. I reconstruct the views of Buffon and Reimarus and show that (i) both Buffon and Reimarus adopted a conceptualist position, according to which concepts structure the cognitive experience of adult humans, and (ii) that both described the mental life of animals as a blooming, buzzing confusion. Kant’s position, I argue, is virtually identical to that of Reimarus. Hence Kant’s views on animals support a conceptualist reading of Kant. The article further articulates the historical antecedents of the Kantian idea that concepts structure human cognitive experience and provides a novel account of how the ideas of similarity and difference were conceptualized in eighteenth-century debates on animal cognition.
@article{van_den_berg_blooming_2018,
title = {A {Blooming} and {Buzzing} {Confusion}: {Buffon}, {Reimarus}, and {Kant} on {Animal} {Cognition}},
volume = {72},
doi = {10.1016/j.shpsc.2018.10.002},
abstract = {Kant’s views on animals have received much attention in recent years. According to some, Kant attributed the capacity for objective perceptual awareness to non-human animals, even though he denied that they have concepts. This position is difficult to square with a conceptualist reading of Kant, according to which objective perceptual awareness requires concepts. Others take Kant’s views on animals to imply that the mental life of animals is a blooming, buzzing confusion. In this article I provide a historical reconstruction of Kant’s views on animals, relating them to eighteenth-century debates on animal cognition. I reconstruct the views of Buffon and Reimarus and show that (i) both Buffon and Reimarus adopted a conceptualist position, according to which concepts structure the cognitive experience of adult humans, and (ii) that both described the mental life of animals as a blooming, buzzing confusion. Kant’s position, I argue, is virtually identical to that of Reimarus. Hence Kant’s views on animals support a conceptualist reading of Kant. The article further articulates the historical antecedents of the Kantian idea that concepts structure human cognitive experience and provides a novel account of how the ideas of similarity and difference were conceptualized in eighteenth-century debates on animal cognition.},
journal = {Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences},
author = {Van den Berg, Hein},
year = {2018},
pages = {1--9},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"ca3tZ8WatHby7Qgeq","bibbaseid":"vandenberg-abloomingandbuzzingconfusionbuffonreimarusandkantonanimalcognition-2018","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2018-12-01T14:25:24.266Z","title":"A Blooming and Buzzing Confusion: Buffon, Reimarus, and Kant on Animal Cognition","author_short":["Van den Berg, H."],"year":2018,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/groups/2493581/items?key=esJ5YGDX6948PQKQSPOfhZpO&format=bibtex&limit=100","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"A Blooming and Buzzing Confusion: Buffon, Reimarus, and Kant on Animal Cognition","volume":"72","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsc.2018.10.002","abstract":"Kant’s views on animals have received much attention in recent years. According to some, Kant attributed the capacity for objective perceptual awareness to non-human animals, even though he denied that they have concepts. This position is difficult to square with a conceptualist reading of Kant, according to which objective perceptual awareness requires concepts. Others take Kant’s views on animals to imply that the mental life of animals is a blooming, buzzing confusion. In this article I provide a historical reconstruction of Kant’s views on animals, relating them to eighteenth-century debates on animal cognition. I reconstruct the views of Buffon and Reimarus and show that (i) both Buffon and Reimarus adopted a conceptualist position, according to which concepts structure the cognitive experience of adult humans, and (ii) that both described the mental life of animals as a blooming, buzzing confusion. Kant’s position, I argue, is virtually identical to that of Reimarus. Hence Kant’s views on animals support a conceptualist reading of Kant. The article further articulates the historical antecedents of the Kantian idea that concepts structure human cognitive experience and provides a novel account of how the ideas of similarity and difference were conceptualized in eighteenth-century debates on animal cognition.","journal":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences","author":[{"propositions":["Van","den"],"lastnames":["Berg"],"firstnames":["Hein"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2018","pages":"1–9","bibtex":"@article{van_den_berg_blooming_2018,\n\ttitle = {A {Blooming} and {Buzzing} {Confusion}: {Buffon}, {Reimarus}, and {Kant} on {Animal} {Cognition}},\n\tvolume = {72},\n\tdoi = {10.1016/j.shpsc.2018.10.002},\n\tabstract = {Kant’s views on animals have received much attention in recent years. According to some, Kant attributed the capacity for objective perceptual awareness to non-human animals, even though he denied that they have concepts. This position is difficult to square with a conceptualist reading of Kant, according to which objective perceptual awareness requires concepts. Others take Kant’s views on animals to imply that the mental life of animals is a blooming, buzzing confusion. In this article I provide a historical reconstruction of Kant’s views on animals, relating them to eighteenth-century debates on animal cognition. I reconstruct the views of Buffon and Reimarus and show that (i) both Buffon and Reimarus adopted a conceptualist position, according to which concepts structure the cognitive experience of adult humans, and (ii) that both described the mental life of animals as a blooming, buzzing confusion. Kant’s position, I argue, is virtually identical to that of Reimarus. Hence Kant’s views on animals support a conceptualist reading of Kant. The article further articulates the historical antecedents of the Kantian idea that concepts structure human cognitive experience and provides a novel account of how the ideas of similarity and difference were conceptualized in eighteenth-century debates on animal cognition.},\n\tjournal = {Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences},\n\tauthor = {Van den Berg, Hein},\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tpages = {1--9},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Van den Berg, H."],"key":"van_den_berg_blooming_2018","id":"van_den_berg_blooming_2018","bibbaseid":"vandenberg-abloomingandbuzzingconfusionbuffonreimarusandkantonanimalcognition-2018","role":"author","urls":{},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{"van den berg, h":"https://bibbase.org/show?bib=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.zotero.org%2Fusers%2F1381186%2Fcollections%2FA7CQ4FV8%2Fitems%3Fkey%3DdvEv4VGZrL0POFKzZn9R2lYC%26format%3Dbibtex%26limit%3D100"}},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["blooming","buzzing","confusion","buffon","reimarus","kant","animal","cognition","van den berg"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":["4FtkmRWeTyJPhQ8jw","57e3e224f7ba57245f000035","5de834458cf0fbde0100000c","5df9874f816c3de0010000c4","5e348526fae8b9de01000145","KSZt8v5i7kh5S28nf","ZPG6GGrmGvB75yBHe","dszBG9ztKKsxv6bYR","ePuNmMSZrv6mz2TM2","mnHJZkMD8HdMxRA5q"],"dataSources":["JodcKTt5D4CtcoY2e","YqqB8NWSxm4bnL8ra","ATwFjrHEsqA4GDy8B","LgE8jY3vkdf8Hkrjo","TP6aBGJTwBSyPqCdB","9kNXu23ABH7j4wxXZ","MzxSQgLp3GvR2xGtR"]}