Tackling wicked problems in infection prevention and control: a guideline for co-creation with stakeholders. van Woezik, A., F., Braakman-Jansen, L., M., Kulyk, O., Siemons, L., & van Gemert-Pijnen, J., E. Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 5:20-016-0119-2. eCollection 2016, 5, 2016. abstract bibtex BACKGROUND: Infection prevention and control can be seen as a wicked public health problem as there is no consensus regarding problem definition and solution, multiple stakeholders with different needs and values are involved, and there is no clear end-point of the problem-solving process. Co-creation with stakeholders has been proposed as a suitable strategy to tackle wicked problems, yet little information and no clear step-by-step guide exist on how to do this. The objectives of this study were to develop a guideline to assist developers in tackling wicked problems using co-creation with stakeholders, and to apply this guideline to practice with an example case in the field of infection prevention and control. METHODS: A mixed-method approach consisting of the integration of both quantitative and qualitative research was used. Relevant stakeholders from the veterinary, human health, and public health sectors were identified using a literature scan, expert recommendations, and snowball sampling. The stakeholder salience approach was used to select key stakeholders based on 3 attributes: power, legitimacy, and urgency. Key values of stakeholders (N = 20) were derived by qualitative semi-structured interviews and quantitatively weighted and prioritized using an online survey. RESULTS: Our method showed that stakeholder identification and analysis are prerequisites for understanding the complex stakeholder network that characterizes wicked problems. A total of 73 stakeholders were identified of which 36 were selected as potential key stakeholders, and only one was seen as a definite stakeholder. In addition, deriving key stakeholder values is a necessity to gain insights into different problem definitions, solutions and needs stakeholders have regarding the wicked problem. Based on the methods used, we developed a step-by-step guideline for co-creation with stakeholders when tackling wicked problems. CONCLUSIONS: The mixed-methods guideline presented here provides a systematic, transparent method to identify, analyze, and co-create with stakeholders, and to recognize and prioritize their values, problem definitions, and solutions in the context of wicked problems. This guideline consists of a general framework and although it was applied in an eHealth context, may be relevant outside of eHealth as well.
@article{
title = {Tackling wicked problems in infection prevention and control: a guideline for co-creation with stakeholders},
type = {article},
year = {2016},
identifiers = {[object Object]},
keywords = {Guideline,One health,Stakeholder,Wicked problem,Zoonosis,eHealth},
pages = {20-016-0119-2. eCollection 2016},
volume = {5},
month = {5},
day = {21},
city = {Center for eHealth and Wellbeing Research; Department of Psychology, Health and Technology. Faculty of Behavioral, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.; Center for eHealth and Wellbeing Research; Department of Psych},
id = {549c7e31-627e-3900-8291-ba7e95ad6b4a},
created = {2016-08-21T22:19:04.000Z},
file_attached = {false},
profile_id = {217ced55-4c79-38dc-838b-4b5ea8df5597},
group_id = {408d37d9-5f1b-3398-a9f5-5c1a487116d4},
last_modified = {2017-03-14T09:54:45.334Z},
read = {false},
starred = {false},
authored = {false},
confirmed = {true},
hidden = {false},
source_type = {JOUR},
notes = {JID: 101585411; OTO: NOTNLM; 2016 [ecollection]; 2016/03/18 [received]; 2016/05/10 [accepted]; 2016/05/21 [epublish]; epublish},
folder_uuids = {73e8a6b0-723d-49a5-bdf3-8e7a7d6e5be0},
private_publication = {false},
abstract = {BACKGROUND: Infection prevention and control can be seen as a wicked public health problem as there is no consensus regarding problem definition and solution, multiple stakeholders with different needs and values are involved, and there is no clear end-point of the problem-solving process. Co-creation with stakeholders has been proposed as a suitable strategy to tackle wicked problems, yet little information and no clear step-by-step guide exist on how to do this. The objectives of this study were to develop a guideline to assist developers in tackling wicked problems using co-creation with stakeholders, and to apply this guideline to practice with an example case in the field of infection prevention and control. METHODS: A mixed-method approach consisting of the integration of both quantitative and qualitative research was used. Relevant stakeholders from the veterinary, human health, and public health sectors were identified using a literature scan, expert recommendations, and snowball sampling. The stakeholder salience approach was used to select key stakeholders based on 3 attributes: power, legitimacy, and urgency. Key values of stakeholders (N = 20) were derived by qualitative semi-structured interviews and quantitatively weighted and prioritized using an online survey. RESULTS: Our method showed that stakeholder identification and analysis are prerequisites for understanding the complex stakeholder network that characterizes wicked problems. A total of 73 stakeholders were identified of which 36 were selected as potential key stakeholders, and only one was seen as a definite stakeholder. In addition, deriving key stakeholder values is a necessity to gain insights into different problem definitions, solutions and needs stakeholders have regarding the wicked problem. Based on the methods used, we developed a step-by-step guideline for co-creation with stakeholders when tackling wicked problems. CONCLUSIONS: The mixed-methods guideline presented here provides a systematic, transparent method to identify, analyze, and co-create with stakeholders, and to recognize and prioritize their values, problem definitions, and solutions in the context of wicked problems. This guideline consists of a general framework and although it was applied in an eHealth context, may be relevant outside of eHealth as well.},
bibtype = {article},
author = {van Woezik, A F and Braakman-Jansen, L M and Kulyk, O and Siemons, L and van Gemert-Pijnen, J E},
journal = {Antimicrobial resistance and infection control}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"FZHTfSjsqGFsbSANf","bibbaseid":"vanwoezik-braakmanjansen-kulyk-siemons-vangemertpijnen-tacklingwickedproblemsininfectionpreventionandcontrolaguidelineforcocreationwithstakeholders-2016","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2017-11-23T19:05:21.084Z","title":"Tackling wicked problems in infection prevention and control: a guideline for co-creation with stakeholders","author_short":["van Woezik, A., F.","Braakman-Jansen, L., M.","Kulyk, O.","Siemons, L.","van Gemert-Pijnen, J., E."],"year":2016,"bibtype":"article","biburl":null,"bibdata":{"title":"Tackling wicked problems in infection prevention and control: a guideline for co-creation with stakeholders","type":"article","year":"2016","identifiers":"[object Object]","keywords":"Guideline,One health,Stakeholder,Wicked problem,Zoonosis,eHealth","pages":"20-016-0119-2. eCollection 2016","volume":"5","month":"5","day":"21","city":"Center for eHealth and Wellbeing Research; Department of Psychology, Health and Technology. Faculty of Behavioral, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.; Center for eHealth and Wellbeing Research; Department of Psych","id":"549c7e31-627e-3900-8291-ba7e95ad6b4a","created":"2016-08-21T22:19:04.000Z","file_attached":false,"profile_id":"217ced55-4c79-38dc-838b-4b5ea8df5597","group_id":"408d37d9-5f1b-3398-a9f5-5c1a487116d4","last_modified":"2017-03-14T09:54:45.334Z","read":false,"starred":false,"authored":false,"confirmed":"true","hidden":false,"source_type":"JOUR","notes":"JID: 101585411; OTO: NOTNLM; 2016 [ecollection]; 2016/03/18 [received]; 2016/05/10 [accepted]; 2016/05/21 [epublish]; epublish","folder_uuids":"73e8a6b0-723d-49a5-bdf3-8e7a7d6e5be0","private_publication":false,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Infection prevention and control can be seen as a wicked public health problem as there is no consensus regarding problem definition and solution, multiple stakeholders with different needs and values are involved, and there is no clear end-point of the problem-solving process. Co-creation with stakeholders has been proposed as a suitable strategy to tackle wicked problems, yet little information and no clear step-by-step guide exist on how to do this. The objectives of this study were to develop a guideline to assist developers in tackling wicked problems using co-creation with stakeholders, and to apply this guideline to practice with an example case in the field of infection prevention and control. METHODS: A mixed-method approach consisting of the integration of both quantitative and qualitative research was used. Relevant stakeholders from the veterinary, human health, and public health sectors were identified using a literature scan, expert recommendations, and snowball sampling. The stakeholder salience approach was used to select key stakeholders based on 3 attributes: power, legitimacy, and urgency. Key values of stakeholders (N = 20) were derived by qualitative semi-structured interviews and quantitatively weighted and prioritized using an online survey. RESULTS: Our method showed that stakeholder identification and analysis are prerequisites for understanding the complex stakeholder network that characterizes wicked problems. A total of 73 stakeholders were identified of which 36 were selected as potential key stakeholders, and only one was seen as a definite stakeholder. In addition, deriving key stakeholder values is a necessity to gain insights into different problem definitions, solutions and needs stakeholders have regarding the wicked problem. Based on the methods used, we developed a step-by-step guideline for co-creation with stakeholders when tackling wicked problems. CONCLUSIONS: The mixed-methods guideline presented here provides a systematic, transparent method to identify, analyze, and co-create with stakeholders, and to recognize and prioritize their values, problem definitions, and solutions in the context of wicked problems. This guideline consists of a general framework and although it was applied in an eHealth context, may be relevant outside of eHealth as well.","bibtype":"article","author":"van Woezik, A F and Braakman-Jansen, L M and Kulyk, O and Siemons, L and van Gemert-Pijnen, J E","journal":"Antimicrobial resistance and infection control","bibtex":"@article{\n title = {Tackling wicked problems in infection prevention and control: a guideline for co-creation with stakeholders},\n type = {article},\n year = {2016},\n identifiers = {[object Object]},\n keywords = {Guideline,One health,Stakeholder,Wicked problem,Zoonosis,eHealth},\n pages = {20-016-0119-2. eCollection 2016},\n volume = {5},\n month = {5},\n day = {21},\n city = {Center for eHealth and Wellbeing Research; Department of Psychology, Health and Technology. Faculty of Behavioral, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.; Center for eHealth and Wellbeing Research; Department of Psych},\n id = {549c7e31-627e-3900-8291-ba7e95ad6b4a},\n created = {2016-08-21T22:19:04.000Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {217ced55-4c79-38dc-838b-4b5ea8df5597},\n group_id = {408d37d9-5f1b-3398-a9f5-5c1a487116d4},\n last_modified = {2017-03-14T09:54:45.334Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {JOUR},\n notes = {JID: 101585411; OTO: NOTNLM; 2016 [ecollection]; 2016/03/18 [received]; 2016/05/10 [accepted]; 2016/05/21 [epublish]; epublish},\n folder_uuids = {73e8a6b0-723d-49a5-bdf3-8e7a7d6e5be0},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {BACKGROUND: Infection prevention and control can be seen as a wicked public health problem as there is no consensus regarding problem definition and solution, multiple stakeholders with different needs and values are involved, and there is no clear end-point of the problem-solving process. Co-creation with stakeholders has been proposed as a suitable strategy to tackle wicked problems, yet little information and no clear step-by-step guide exist on how to do this. The objectives of this study were to develop a guideline to assist developers in tackling wicked problems using co-creation with stakeholders, and to apply this guideline to practice with an example case in the field of infection prevention and control. METHODS: A mixed-method approach consisting of the integration of both quantitative and qualitative research was used. Relevant stakeholders from the veterinary, human health, and public health sectors were identified using a literature scan, expert recommendations, and snowball sampling. The stakeholder salience approach was used to select key stakeholders based on 3 attributes: power, legitimacy, and urgency. Key values of stakeholders (N = 20) were derived by qualitative semi-structured interviews and quantitatively weighted and prioritized using an online survey. RESULTS: Our method showed that stakeholder identification and analysis are prerequisites for understanding the complex stakeholder network that characterizes wicked problems. A total of 73 stakeholders were identified of which 36 were selected as potential key stakeholders, and only one was seen as a definite stakeholder. In addition, deriving key stakeholder values is a necessity to gain insights into different problem definitions, solutions and needs stakeholders have regarding the wicked problem. Based on the methods used, we developed a step-by-step guideline for co-creation with stakeholders when tackling wicked problems. CONCLUSIONS: The mixed-methods guideline presented here provides a systematic, transparent method to identify, analyze, and co-create with stakeholders, and to recognize and prioritize their values, problem definitions, and solutions in the context of wicked problems. This guideline consists of a general framework and although it was applied in an eHealth context, may be relevant outside of eHealth as well.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {van Woezik, A F and Braakman-Jansen, L M and Kulyk, O and Siemons, L and van Gemert-Pijnen, J E},\n journal = {Antimicrobial resistance and infection control}\n}","author_short":["van Woezik, A., F.","Braakman-Jansen, L., M.","Kulyk, O.","Siemons, L.","van Gemert-Pijnen, J., E."],"bibbaseid":"vanwoezik-braakmanjansen-kulyk-siemons-vangemertpijnen-tacklingwickedproblemsininfectionpreventionandcontrolaguidelineforcocreationwithstakeholders-2016","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["Guideline","One health","Stakeholder","Wicked problem","Zoonosis","eHealth"],"downloads":0},"search_terms":["tackling","wicked","problems","infection","prevention","control","guideline","creation","stakeholders","van woezik","braakman-jansen","kulyk","siemons","van gemert-pijnen"],"keywords":["guideline","one health","stakeholder","wicked problem","zoonosis","ehealth"],"authorIDs":[]}