Constancy of silicate-mineral weathering-rate ratios between natural and experimental weathering: implications for hydrologic control of differences in absolute rates. Velbel, M. Chemical Geolog, 1993.
Paper abstract bibtex Inverse models which apportion watershed geochemical mass balance over estimated mineral surface area give weathering rates for individual silicate minerals 1-3 orders of magnitude slower than laboratory rates. The coefficient which corrects the weathering rate for any mineral from a laboratory data-set to a field setting is identical to the corresponding coefficient for any other mineral in the same data sets. Physical (e.g., hydrologic) controls, rather than compositional or chemical controls, cause the difference between weathering rates in nature and the laboratory. Because flow in natural weathering profiles is spatially heterogeneous, not all of the potentially available surface in natural systems actually participates in reactions with pore fluids.
@article{velbel_constancy_1993,
title = {Constancy of silicate-mineral weathering-rate ratios between natural and experimental weathering: implications for hydrologic control of differences in absolute rates.},
volume = {105},
url = {http://cwt33.ecology.uga.edu/publications/342.pdf},
abstract = {Inverse models which apportion watershed geochemical mass balance over estimated mineral surface area give weathering rates for individual silicate minerals 1-3 orders of magnitude slower than laboratory rates. The coefficient which corrects the weathering rate for any mineral from a laboratory data-set to a field setting is identical to the corresponding coefficient for any other mineral in the same data sets. Physical (e.g., hydrologic) controls, rather than compositional or chemical controls, cause the difference between weathering rates in nature and the laboratory. Because flow in natural weathering profiles is spatially heterogeneous, not all of the potentially available surface in natural systems actually participates in reactions with pore fluids.},
journal = {Chemical Geolog},
author = {Velbel, M.A.},
year = {1993},
keywords = {CWT}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"hvk32iytGBFSmfHzm","bibbaseid":"velbel-constancyofsilicatemineralweatheringrateratiosbetweennaturalandexperimentalweatheringimplicationsforhydrologiccontrolofdifferencesinabsoluterates-1993","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2018-08-10T13:52:32.069Z","title":"Constancy of silicate-mineral weathering-rate ratios between natural and experimental weathering: implications for hydrologic control of differences in absolute rates.","author_short":["Velbel, M."],"year":1993,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://utexas.box.com/shared/static/zu6wjvi2axvnvyb14tqb7thj0injl6kg.bib","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Constancy of silicate-mineral weathering-rate ratios between natural and experimental weathering: implications for hydrologic control of differences in absolute rates.","volume":"105","url":"http://cwt33.ecology.uga.edu/publications/342.pdf","abstract":"Inverse models which apportion watershed geochemical mass balance over estimated mineral surface area give weathering rates for individual silicate minerals 1-3 orders of magnitude slower than laboratory rates. The coefficient which corrects the weathering rate for any mineral from a laboratory data-set to a field setting is identical to the corresponding coefficient for any other mineral in the same data sets. Physical (e.g., hydrologic) controls, rather than compositional or chemical controls, cause the difference between weathering rates in nature and the laboratory. Because flow in natural weathering profiles is spatially heterogeneous, not all of the potentially available surface in natural systems actually participates in reactions with pore fluids.","journal":"Chemical Geolog","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Velbel"],"firstnames":["M.A."],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"1993","keywords":"CWT","bibtex":"@article{velbel_constancy_1993,\n\ttitle = {Constancy of silicate-mineral weathering-rate ratios between natural and experimental weathering: implications for hydrologic control of differences in absolute rates.},\n\tvolume = {105},\n\turl = {http://cwt33.ecology.uga.edu/publications/342.pdf},\n\tabstract = {Inverse models which apportion watershed geochemical mass balance over estimated mineral surface area give weathering rates for individual silicate minerals 1-3 orders of magnitude slower than laboratory rates. The coefficient which corrects the weathering rate for any mineral from a laboratory data-set to a field setting is identical to the corresponding coefficient for any other mineral in the same data sets. Physical (e.g., hydrologic) controls, rather than compositional or chemical controls, cause the difference between weathering rates in nature and the laboratory. Because flow in natural weathering profiles is spatially heterogeneous, not all of the potentially available surface in natural systems actually participates in reactions with pore fluids.},\n\tjournal = {Chemical Geolog},\n\tauthor = {Velbel, M.A.},\n\tyear = {1993},\n\tkeywords = {CWT}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Velbel, M."],"key":"velbel_constancy_1993","id":"velbel_constancy_1993","bibbaseid":"velbel-constancyofsilicatemineralweatheringrateratiosbetweennaturalandexperimentalweatheringimplicationsforhydrologiccontrolofdifferencesinabsoluterates-1993","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://cwt33.ecology.uga.edu/publications/342.pdf"},"keyword":["CWT"],"downloads":0,"html":""},"search_terms":["constancy","silicate","mineral","weathering","rate","ratios","between","natural","experimental","weathering","implications","hydrologic","control","differences","absolute","rates","velbel"],"keywords":["cwt"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["QJ3rksNA453pSQSBg"]}