Gardens of Eden or Hearts of Darkness? The Genealogy of Discourses on Environmental Insecurity and Climate Wars in Africa. Verhoeven, H. Geopolitics, 19(4):784–805, 2014.
Gardens of Eden or Hearts of Darkness? The Genealogy of Discourses on Environmental Insecurity and Climate Wars in Africa [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
This article argues that the securitisation of Africa’s environment and climate in the early twenty-first century has less to do with multidisciplinary inquiry into the complexities of climate change, development and conflict, and more with historically established paradigms of thinking about Africa, its ecosystems and notions of disorder and violence. Securitisation is the result of a specific moment in the post–Cold War era with its particular geopolitical configuration and of deeply embedded modes of imagining the African continent, its peoples and their relationship with the environments they inhabit. The main objective of this article is to historicise and politicise the prevailing dystopian discourse about climate-induced insecurity. I show that the assumptions and chains of causality that constitute today’s climate wars narrative are remarkably similar in nature to the environmental narratives that underpinned imperialist and post-independence discourses on environment and development, legitimising highly authoritarian interventions against local populations by governments. ©, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
@article{verhoeven_gardens_2014,
	title = {Gardens of {Eden} or {Hearts} of {Darkness}? {The} {Genealogy} of {Discourses} on {Environmental} {Insecurity} and {Climate} {Wars} in {Africa}},
	volume = {19},
	issn = {14650045 (ISSN)},
	url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84912028865&doi=10.1080%2f14650045.2014.896794&partnerID=40&md5=89f5ac3de38bf0e40dc1eb05d6eed5d5},
	doi = {10.1080/14650045.2014.896794},
	abstract = {This article argues that the securitisation of Africa’s environment and climate in the early twenty-first century has less to do with multidisciplinary inquiry into the complexities of climate change, development and conflict, and more with historically established paradigms of thinking about Africa, its ecosystems and notions of disorder and violence. Securitisation is the result of a specific moment in the post–Cold War era with its particular geopolitical configuration and of deeply embedded modes of imagining the African continent, its peoples and their relationship with the environments they inhabit. The main objective of this article is to historicise and politicise the prevailing dystopian discourse about climate-induced insecurity. I show that the assumptions and chains of causality that constitute today’s climate wars narrative are remarkably similar in nature to the environmental narratives that underpinned imperialist and post-independence discourses on environment and development, legitimising highly authoritarian interventions against local populations by governments. ©, Taylor \& Francis Group, LLC.},
	language = {English},
	number = {4},
	journal = {Geopolitics},
	author = {Verhoeven, H.},
	year = {2014},
	keywords = {*gardening, Africa, Cold War, climate change, climate effect, environmental management, genealogy, geopolitics, nature-society relations, political discourse, twenty first century, violence},
	pages = {784--805},
}

Downloads: 0