@article{villnowExaminingGermanMedia2019,
	title = {Examining {German} {Media} {Coverage} of the {Re}-{Evaluation} of {Glyphosate}},
	volume = {11},
	copyright = {http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/},
	issn = {2071-1050},
	url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1910},
	doi = {10.3390/su11071910},
	abstract = {This study investigates media coverage of the re-evaluation process of glyphosate from 1 January 2015 to 31 March 2018. In a comparative, qualitative print media analysis, the promotion of claims and the use of narratives of Die Zeit, a weekly newspaper, and top agrar, an agricultural trade journal, are explored. Results identify noticeable differences in both media outlets’ news reporting. Whereas Die Zeit focused on potential health risks and the scientific controversy, top agrar’s coverage emphasized the harmlessness of glyphosate. The multifaceted use of narratives by Die Zeit contrasts with the comparatively low use of narratives by top agrar.},
	language = {en},
	number = {7},
	urldate = {2024-05-30},
	journal = {Sustainability},
	publisher = {Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute},
	author = {Villnow, Veronika and Rombach, Meike and Bitsch, Vera},
	month = jan,
	year = {2019},
	note = {Number: 7},
	keywords = {agriculture, claims-making, narratives, news values, qualitative content analysis},
	pages = {1910},
}

{"_id":"tTEkyCcuYDZ55zLFC","bibbaseid":"villnow-rombach-bitsch-examininggermanmediacoverageofthereevaluationofglyphosate-2019","author_short":["Villnow, V.","Rombach, M.","Bitsch, V."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Examining German Media Coverage of the Re-Evaluation of Glyphosate","volume":"11","copyright":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/","issn":"2071-1050","url":"https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1910","doi":"10.3390/su11071910","abstract":"This study investigates media coverage of the re-evaluation process of glyphosate from 1 January 2015 to 31 March 2018. In a comparative, qualitative print media analysis, the promotion of claims and the use of narratives of Die Zeit, a weekly newspaper, and top agrar, an agricultural trade journal, are explored. Results identify noticeable differences in both media outlets’ news reporting. Whereas Die Zeit focused on potential health risks and the scientific controversy, top agrar’s coverage emphasized the harmlessness of glyphosate. The multifaceted use of narratives by Die Zeit contrasts with the comparatively low use of narratives by top agrar.","language":"en","number":"7","urldate":"2024-05-30","journal":"Sustainability","publisher":"Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Villnow"],"firstnames":["Veronika"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Rombach"],"firstnames":["Meike"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bitsch"],"firstnames":["Vera"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"January","year":"2019","note":"Number: 7","keywords":"agriculture, claims-making, narratives, news values, qualitative content analysis","pages":"1910","bibtex":"@article{villnowExaminingGermanMedia2019,\n\ttitle = {Examining {German} {Media} {Coverage} of the {Re}-{Evaluation} of {Glyphosate}},\n\tvolume = {11},\n\tcopyright = {http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/},\n\tissn = {2071-1050},\n\turl = {https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1910},\n\tdoi = {10.3390/su11071910},\n\tabstract = {This study investigates media coverage of the re-evaluation process of glyphosate from 1 January 2015 to 31 March 2018. In a comparative, qualitative print media analysis, the promotion of claims and the use of narratives of Die Zeit, a weekly newspaper, and top agrar, an agricultural trade journal, are explored. Results identify noticeable differences in both media outlets’ news reporting. Whereas Die Zeit focused on potential health risks and the scientific controversy, top agrar’s coverage emphasized the harmlessness of glyphosate. The multifaceted use of narratives by Die Zeit contrasts with the comparatively low use of narratives by top agrar.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {7},\n\turldate = {2024-05-30},\n\tjournal = {Sustainability},\n\tpublisher = {Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute},\n\tauthor = {Villnow, Veronika and Rombach, Meike and Bitsch, Vera},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2019},\n\tnote = {Number: 7},\n\tkeywords = {agriculture, claims-making, narratives, news values, qualitative content analysis},\n\tpages = {1910},\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Villnow, V.","Rombach, M.","Bitsch, V."],"key":"villnowExaminingGermanMedia2019","id":"villnowExaminingGermanMedia2019","bibbaseid":"villnow-rombach-bitsch-examininggermanmediacoverageofthereevaluationofglyphosate-2019","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1910"},"keyword":["agriculture","claims-making","narratives","news values","qualitative content analysis"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero-group/lisageorge/5712602","dataSources":["wyomW5pZBH3FGfJW9"],"keywords":["agriculture","claims-making","narratives","news values","qualitative content analysis"],"search_terms":["examining","german","media","coverage","evaluation","glyphosate","villnow","rombach","bitsch"],"title":"Examining German Media Coverage of the Re-Evaluation of Glyphosate","year":2019}