Exploring the Spectrum of Temporal Summation and Conditioned Pain Modulation Responses in Pain‐Free Individuals Using a Tonic Heat Pain and Cold Pressor Test Paradigms

Exploring the Spectrum of Temporal Summation and Conditioned Pain Modulation Responses in Pain‐Free Individuals Using a Tonic Heat Pain and Cold Pressor Test Paradigms. Vincenot, M., Léonard, G., Cloutier‐Langevin, C., Bordeleau, M., Gendron, L., Camirand Lemyre, F., & Marchand, S. European Journal of Pain, 29(5):e70019, May, 2025.

Paper doi abstract bibtex

ABSTRACT Background Temporal summation (TS) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) are impaired in many chronic pain individuals, although typical TS and CPM responses remain unclear. Providing a quantile distribution of TS and CPM values could help determine whether TS and CPM responses fall outside the usual ranges, thereby informing pain management strategies. The objective of this study was to provide a response distribution for these mechanisms in a large, pain‐free cohort. Methods Pain‐free participants ( n = 347) were evaluated. TS was interpreted as the change in pain perception scores during a constant heat pain stimulus. CPM was assessed by the difference in pain perception scores induced by a tonic heat pain stimulus and a mechanical pain threshold, before and after a cold pressor test (CPT). Quantile regression was performed to identify the 5th to 95th percentiles, with a specific focus on the 75th, 90th and 95th percentiles and their confidence intervals, while considering age and sex. Results Analyses revealed a particularly large range of TS and CPM responses, spanning from strong inhibition in CPM and strong summation in TS to moderate or even null effects. Notably, some responses deviated from the expected patterns, with certain individuals exhibiting hyperalgesic CPM effects and others displaying hypoalgesic TS responses. The highest percentiles of the TS distribution were influenced by age and gender, while CPM scores remained unchanged. Conclusion The results of this study provide an overview of the possible spectra of responses for TS and CPM, potentially paving the way for their incorporation into pain management strategies. Significance Statement This study examines the spectrum and provides a distribution for TS and CPM values to better identify what may constitute a deficit in these mechanisms and enhance their clinical interpretation. Trial Registration clinicaltrial.gov identifier: NCT03376867

@article{vincenot_exploring_2025,
	title = {Exploring the {Spectrum} of {Temporal} {Summation} and {Conditioned} {Pain} {Modulation} {Responses} in {Pain}‐{Free} {Individuals} {Using} a {Tonic} {Heat} {Pain} and {Cold} {Pressor} {Test} {Paradigms}},
	volume = {29},
	issn = {1090-3801, 1532-2149},
	url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejp.70019},
	doi = {10.1002/ejp.70019},
	abstract = {ABSTRACT
            
              Background
              Temporal summation (TS) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) are impaired in many chronic pain individuals, although typical TS and CPM responses remain unclear. Providing a quantile distribution of TS and CPM values could help determine whether TS and CPM responses fall outside the usual ranges, thereby informing pain management strategies. The objective of this study was to provide a response distribution for these mechanisms in a large, pain‐free cohort.
            
            
              Methods
              
                Pain‐free participants (
                n
                 = 347) were evaluated. TS was interpreted as the change in pain perception scores during a constant heat pain stimulus. CPM was assessed by the difference in pain perception scores induced by a tonic heat pain stimulus and a mechanical pain threshold, before and after a cold pressor test (CPT). Quantile regression was performed to identify the 5th to 95th percentiles, with a specific focus on the 75th, 90th and 95th percentiles and their confidence intervals, while considering age and sex.
              
            
            
              Results
              Analyses revealed a particularly large range of TS and CPM responses, spanning from strong inhibition in CPM and strong summation in TS to moderate or even null effects. Notably, some responses deviated from the expected patterns, with certain individuals exhibiting hyperalgesic CPM effects and others displaying hypoalgesic TS responses. The highest percentiles of the TS distribution were influenced by age and gender, while CPM scores remained unchanged.
            
            
              Conclusion
              The results of this study provide an overview of the possible spectra of responses for TS and CPM, potentially paving the way for their incorporation into pain management strategies.
            
            
              Significance Statement
              This study examines the spectrum and provides a distribution for TS and CPM values to better identify what may constitute a deficit in these mechanisms and enhance their clinical interpretation.
            
            
              Trial Registration
              
                clinicaltrial.gov
                identifier: NCT03376867},
	language = {en},
	number = {5},
	urldate = {2025-05-05},
	journal = {European Journal of Pain},
	author = {Vincenot, M. and Léonard, G. and Cloutier‐Langevin, C. and Bordeleau, M. and Gendron, L. and Camirand Lemyre, Félix and Marchand, S.},
	month = may,
	year = {2025},
	keywords = {CVC-Articles de revue, FRQS-Documents revus et publiés, Journal  Article},
	pages = {e70019},
}

Downloads: 0

{"_id":"SpLuBEqpbJaZPFaEM","bibbaseid":"vincenot-lonard-cloutierlangevin-bordeleau-gendron-camirandlemyre-marchand-exploringthespectrumoftemporalsummationandconditionedpainmodulationresponsesinpainfreeindividualsusingatonicheatpainandcoldpressortestparadigms-2025","author_short":["Vincenot, M.","Léonard, G.","Cloutier‐Langevin, C.","Bordeleau, M.","Gendron, L.","Camirand Lemyre, F.","Marchand, S."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Exploring the Spectrum of Temporal Summation and Conditioned Pain Modulation Responses in Pain‐Free Individuals Using a Tonic Heat Pain and Cold Pressor Test Paradigms","volume":"29","issn":"1090-3801, 1532-2149","url":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejp.70019","doi":"10.1002/ejp.70019","abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Temporal summation (TS) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) are impaired in many chronic pain individuals, although typical TS and CPM responses remain unclear. Providing a quantile distribution of TS and CPM values could help determine whether TS and CPM responses fall outside the usual ranges, thereby informing pain management strategies. The objective of this study was to provide a response distribution for these mechanisms in a large, pain‐free cohort. Methods Pain‐free participants ( n = 347) were evaluated. TS was interpreted as the change in pain perception scores during a constant heat pain stimulus. CPM was assessed by the difference in pain perception scores induced by a tonic heat pain stimulus and a mechanical pain threshold, before and after a cold pressor test (CPT). Quantile regression was performed to identify the 5th to 95th percentiles, with a specific focus on the 75th, 90th and 95th percentiles and their confidence intervals, while considering age and sex. Results Analyses revealed a particularly large range of TS and CPM responses, spanning from strong inhibition in CPM and strong summation in TS to moderate or even null effects. Notably, some responses deviated from the expected patterns, with certain individuals exhibiting hyperalgesic CPM effects and others displaying hypoalgesic TS responses. The highest percentiles of the TS distribution were influenced by age and gender, while CPM scores remained unchanged. Conclusion The results of this study provide an overview of the possible spectra of responses for TS and CPM, potentially paving the way for their incorporation into pain management strategies. Significance Statement This study examines the spectrum and provides a distribution for TS and CPM values to better identify what may constitute a deficit in these mechanisms and enhance their clinical interpretation. Trial Registration clinicaltrial.gov identifier: NCT03376867","language":"en","number":"5","urldate":"2025-05-05","journal":"European Journal of Pain","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Vincenot"],"firstnames":["M."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Léonard"],"firstnames":["G."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Cloutier‐Langevin"],"firstnames":["C."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bordeleau"],"firstnames":["M."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Gendron"],"firstnames":["L."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Camirand","Lemyre"],"firstnames":["Félix"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Marchand"],"firstnames":["S."],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"May","year":"2025","keywords":"CVC-Articles de revue, FRQS-Documents revus et publiés, Journal Article","pages":"e70019","bibtex":"@article{vincenot_exploring_2025,\n\ttitle = {Exploring the {Spectrum} of {Temporal} {Summation} and {Conditioned} {Pain} {Modulation} {Responses} in {Pain}‐{Free} {Individuals} {Using} a {Tonic} {Heat} {Pain} and {Cold} {Pressor} {Test} {Paradigms}},\n\tvolume = {29},\n\tissn = {1090-3801, 1532-2149},\n\turl = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejp.70019},\n\tdoi = {10.1002/ejp.70019},\n\tabstract = {ABSTRACT\n \n Background\n Temporal summation (TS) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) are impaired in many chronic pain individuals, although typical TS and CPM responses remain unclear. Providing a quantile distribution of TS and CPM values could help determine whether TS and CPM responses fall outside the usual ranges, thereby informing pain management strategies. The objective of this study was to provide a response distribution for these mechanisms in a large, pain‐free cohort.\n \n \n Methods\n \n Pain‐free participants (\n n\n = 347) were evaluated. TS was interpreted as the change in pain perception scores during a constant heat pain stimulus. CPM was assessed by the difference in pain perception scores induced by a tonic heat pain stimulus and a mechanical pain threshold, before and after a cold pressor test (CPT). Quantile regression was performed to identify the 5th to 95th percentiles, with a specific focus on the 75th, 90th and 95th percentiles and their confidence intervals, while considering age and sex.\n \n \n \n Results\n Analyses revealed a particularly large range of TS and CPM responses, spanning from strong inhibition in CPM and strong summation in TS to moderate or even null effects. Notably, some responses deviated from the expected patterns, with certain individuals exhibiting hyperalgesic CPM effects and others displaying hypoalgesic TS responses. The highest percentiles of the TS distribution were influenced by age and gender, while CPM scores remained unchanged.\n \n \n Conclusion\n The results of this study provide an overview of the possible spectra of responses for TS and CPM, potentially paving the way for their incorporation into pain management strategies.\n \n \n Significance Statement\n This study examines the spectrum and provides a distribution for TS and CPM values to better identify what may constitute a deficit in these mechanisms and enhance their clinical interpretation.\n \n \n Trial Registration\n \n clinicaltrial.gov\n identifier: NCT03376867},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {5},\n\turldate = {2025-05-05},\n\tjournal = {European Journal of Pain},\n\tauthor = {Vincenot, M. and Léonard, G. and Cloutier‐Langevin, C. and Bordeleau, M. and Gendron, L. and Camirand Lemyre, Félix and Marchand, S.},\n\tmonth = may,\n\tyear = {2025},\n\tkeywords = {CVC-Articles de revue, FRQS-Documents revus et publiés, Journal Article},\n\tpages = {e70019},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Vincenot, M.","Léonard, G.","Cloutier‐Langevin, C.","Bordeleau, M.","Gendron, L.","Camirand Lemyre, F.","Marchand, S."],"key":"vincenot_exploring_2025","id":"vincenot_exploring_2025","bibbaseid":"vincenot-lonard-cloutierlangevin-bordeleau-gendron-camirandlemyre-marchand-exploringthespectrumoftemporalsummationandconditionedpainmodulationresponsesinpainfreeindividualsusingatonicheatpainandcoldpressortestparadigms-2025","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejp.70019"},"keyword":["CVC-Articles de revue","FRQS-Documents revus et publiés","Journal Article"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/groups/2298129/items?key=Di2aUrSQXpXlWmYdUvNGDXyv&format=bibtex&limit=100","dataSources":["3byWrivAb63dcxozq"],"keywords":["cvc-articles de revue","frqs-documents revus et publiés","journal article"],"search_terms":["exploring","spectrum","temporal","summation","conditioned","pain","modulation","responses","pain","free","individuals","using","tonic","heat","pain","cold","pressor","test","paradigms","vincenot","léonard","cloutier‐langevin","bordeleau","gendron","camirand lemyre","marchand"],"title":"Exploring the Spectrum of Temporal Summation and Conditioned Pain Modulation Responses in Pain‐Free Individuals Using a Tonic Heat Pain and Cold Pressor Test Paradigms","year":2025}