The ‘assertive edition’. Vogeler, G. International Journal of Digital Humanities, 1(2):309–322, July, 2019. 🏷️ /unread、History、Semantic web、Critial edition、Digital scholarly edition、Historical documents、RDF (Resource Description Framework)、TEI (Text Encoding Initiative)Paper doi abstract bibtex The paper describes the special interest among historians in scholarly editing and the resulting editorial practice in contrast to the methods applied by pure philological textual criticism. The interest in historical ‘facts’ suggests methods the goal of which is to create formal representations of the information conveyed by the text in structured databases. This can be achieved with RDF representations of statements extracted from the text, by automatic information extraction methods, or by hand. The paper suggests the use of embedded RDF representations in TEI markup, following the practice in several recent projects, and it concludes with a proposal for a definition of the ‘assertive edition’. 【摘要翻译】本文介绍了历史学家对学术编辑的特殊兴趣,以及由此产生的编辑实践,与纯语言学文本批评所采用的方法形成鲜明对比。对历史 "事实 "的兴趣提出了一些方法,其目标是在结构化数据库中创建文本所传达信息的正式表征。这可以通过从文本中提取语句的 RDF 表示法、自动信息提取方法或人工方法来实现。本文建议按照最近几个项目的做法,在 TEI 标记中使用嵌入式 RDF 表示法,最后提出了 "断言版 "的定义。
@article{vogeler2019,
title = {The ‘assertive edition’},
volume = {1},
issn = {2524-7832},
shorttitle = {自信版},
url = {http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42803-019-00025-5},
doi = {10.1007/s42803-019-00025-5},
abstract = {The paper describes the special interest among historians in scholarly editing and the resulting editorial practice in contrast to the methods applied by pure philological textual criticism. The interest in historical ‘facts’ suggests methods the goal of which is to create formal representations of the information conveyed by the text in structured databases. This can be achieved with RDF representations of statements extracted from the text, by automatic information extraction methods, or by hand. The paper suggests the use of embedded RDF representations in TEI markup, following the practice in several recent projects, and it concludes with a proposal for a definition of the ‘assertive edition’.
【摘要翻译】本文介绍了历史学家对学术编辑的特殊兴趣,以及由此产生的编辑实践,与纯语言学文本批评所采用的方法形成鲜明对比。对历史 "事实 "的兴趣提出了一些方法,其目标是在结构化数据库中创建文本所传达信息的正式表征。这可以通过从文本中提取语句的 RDF 表示法、自动信息提取方法或人工方法来实现。本文建议按照最近几个项目的做法,在 TEI 标记中使用嵌入式 RDF 表示法,最后提出了 "断言版 "的定义。},
language = {en},
number = {2},
urldate = {2023-04-03},
journal = {International Journal of Digital Humanities},
author = {Vogeler, Georg},
month = jul,
year = {2019},
note = {🏷️ /unread、History、Semantic web、Critial edition、Digital scholarly edition、Historical documents、RDF (Resource Description Framework)、TEI (Text Encoding Initiative)},
keywords = {/unread, Critial edition, Digital scholarly edition, Historical documents, History, RDF (Resource Description Framework), Semantic web, TEI (Text Encoding Initiative)},
pages = {309--322},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"6BatCh8YdvqJePL8i","bibbaseid":"vogeler-theassertiveedition-2019","author_short":["Vogeler, G."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"The ‘assertive edition’","volume":"1","issn":"2524-7832","shorttitle":"自信版","url":"http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42803-019-00025-5","doi":"10.1007/s42803-019-00025-5","abstract":"The paper describes the special interest among historians in scholarly editing and the resulting editorial practice in contrast to the methods applied by pure philological textual criticism. The interest in historical ‘facts’ suggests methods the goal of which is to create formal representations of the information conveyed by the text in structured databases. This can be achieved with RDF representations of statements extracted from the text, by automatic information extraction methods, or by hand. The paper suggests the use of embedded RDF representations in TEI markup, following the practice in several recent projects, and it concludes with a proposal for a definition of the ‘assertive edition’. 【摘要翻译】本文介绍了历史学家对学术编辑的特殊兴趣,以及由此产生的编辑实践,与纯语言学文本批评所采用的方法形成鲜明对比。对历史 \"事实 \"的兴趣提出了一些方法,其目标是在结构化数据库中创建文本所传达信息的正式表征。这可以通过从文本中提取语句的 RDF 表示法、自动信息提取方法或人工方法来实现。本文建议按照最近几个项目的做法,在 TEI 标记中使用嵌入式 RDF 表示法,最后提出了 \"断言版 \"的定义。","language":"en","number":"2","urldate":"2023-04-03","journal":"International Journal of Digital Humanities","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Vogeler"],"firstnames":["Georg"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"July","year":"2019","note":"🏷️ /unread、History、Semantic web、Critial edition、Digital scholarly edition、Historical documents、RDF (Resource Description Framework)、TEI (Text Encoding Initiative)","keywords":"/unread, Critial edition, Digital scholarly edition, Historical documents, History, RDF (Resource Description Framework), Semantic web, TEI (Text Encoding Initiative)","pages":"309–322","bibtex":"@article{vogeler2019,\n\ttitle = {The ‘assertive edition’},\n\tvolume = {1},\n\tissn = {2524-7832},\n\tshorttitle = {自信版},\n\turl = {http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42803-019-00025-5},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/s42803-019-00025-5},\n\tabstract = {The paper describes the special interest among historians in scholarly editing and the resulting editorial practice in contrast to the methods applied by pure philological textual criticism. The interest in historical ‘facts’ suggests methods the goal of which is to create formal representations of the information conveyed by the text in structured databases. This can be achieved with RDF representations of statements extracted from the text, by automatic information extraction methods, or by hand. The paper suggests the use of embedded RDF representations in TEI markup, following the practice in several recent projects, and it concludes with a proposal for a definition of the ‘assertive edition’.\n\n【摘要翻译】本文介绍了历史学家对学术编辑的特殊兴趣,以及由此产生的编辑实践,与纯语言学文本批评所采用的方法形成鲜明对比。对历史 \"事实 \"的兴趣提出了一些方法,其目标是在结构化数据库中创建文本所传达信息的正式表征。这可以通过从文本中提取语句的 RDF 表示法、自动信息提取方法或人工方法来实现。本文建议按照最近几个项目的做法,在 TEI 标记中使用嵌入式 RDF 表示法,最后提出了 \"断言版 \"的定义。},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2023-04-03},\n\tjournal = {International Journal of Digital Humanities},\n\tauthor = {Vogeler, Georg},\n\tmonth = jul,\n\tyear = {2019},\n\tnote = {🏷️ /unread、History、Semantic web、Critial edition、Digital scholarly edition、Historical documents、RDF (Resource Description Framework)、TEI (Text Encoding Initiative)},\n\tkeywords = {/unread, Critial edition, Digital scholarly edition, Historical documents, History, RDF (Resource Description Framework), Semantic web, TEI (Text Encoding Initiative)},\n\tpages = {309--322},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Vogeler, G."],"key":"vogeler2019","id":"vogeler2019","bibbaseid":"vogeler-theassertiveedition-2019","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42803-019-00025-5"},"keyword":["/unread","Critial edition","Digital scholarly edition","Historical documents","History","RDF (Resource Description Framework)","Semantic web","TEI (Text Encoding Initiative)"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/groups/2386895/collections/7PPRTB2H/items?format=bibtex&limit=100","dataSources":["L79iy7WyzCDgb996i","u8q5uny4m5jJL9RcX","9NEHEPxnGsECrWvrT","qDQgDGCDWs4MmvAty","WNphXEdxfZ6z2ufbB"],"keywords":["/unread","critial edition","digital scholarly edition","historical documents","history","rdf (resource description framework)","semantic web","tei (text encoding initiative)"],"search_terms":["assertive","edition","vogeler"],"title":"The ‘assertive edition’","year":2019}