Remaking the Sustainable Development Goals: relational Indigenous epistemologies. Waldmüller, J. M, Yap, M., & Watene, K. Policy and Society, 41(4):471–485, December, 2022. ![Remaking the Sustainable Development Goals: relational Indigenous epistemologies [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex While the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were inclusive in their design, the reliance on official measurement infrastructures has upheld narrow definitions of both the terms of sustainability and development. Indigenous and non-Indigenous “governance beyond the state” approaches call these definitions into question. They highlight that disaggregated official data are unable to fully reflect alternative grounds and aspirations of living sustainably with the environment and non-human world. Relational Indigenous epistemologies and practices contribute to alternative epistemic infrastructures. In this paper, three examples from the Andean-Pacific region provide an alternative lens through which to reconceptualize and remake the SDG landscape. Together this suite of cases highlights the importance of bottom-up articulation processes, knowledge inclusion, and alternative epistemic harmonization for operationalizing the SDGs. In particular, we highlight the urgent need to renegotiate the relationship between Indigenous communities and the global measurement infrastructure in order to pursue and realize global sustainability goals.
@article{waldmuller_remaking_2022,
title = {Remaking the {Sustainable} {Development} {Goals}: relational {Indigenous} epistemologies},
volume = {41},
issn = {1449-4035},
shorttitle = {Remaking the {Sustainable} {Development} {Goals}},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puac026},
doi = {10.1093/polsoc/puac026},
abstract = {While the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were inclusive in their design, the reliance on official measurement infrastructures has upheld narrow definitions of both the terms of sustainability and development. Indigenous and non-Indigenous “governance beyond the state” approaches call these definitions into question. They highlight that disaggregated official data are unable to fully reflect alternative grounds and aspirations of living sustainably with the environment and non-human world. Relational Indigenous epistemologies and practices contribute to alternative epistemic infrastructures. In this paper, three examples from the Andean-Pacific region provide an alternative lens through which to reconceptualize and remake the SDG landscape. Together this suite of cases highlights the importance of bottom-up articulation processes, knowledge inclusion, and alternative epistemic harmonization for operationalizing the SDGs. In particular, we highlight the urgent need to renegotiate the relationship between Indigenous communities and the global measurement infrastructure in order to pursue and realize global sustainability goals.},
number = {4},
urldate = {2024-04-18},
journal = {Policy and Society},
author = {Waldmüller, Johannes M and Yap, Mandy and Watene, Krushil},
month = dec,
year = {2022},
pages = {471--485},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"YApCb3mz5iz92fdwn","bibbaseid":"waldmller-yap-watene-remakingthesustainabledevelopmentgoalsrelationalindigenousepistemologies-2022","author_short":["Waldmüller, J. M","Yap, M.","Watene, K."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Remaking the Sustainable Development Goals: relational Indigenous epistemologies","volume":"41","issn":"1449-4035","shorttitle":"Remaking the Sustainable Development Goals","url":"https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puac026","doi":"10.1093/polsoc/puac026","abstract":"While the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were inclusive in their design, the reliance on official measurement infrastructures has upheld narrow definitions of both the terms of sustainability and development. Indigenous and non-Indigenous “governance beyond the state” approaches call these definitions into question. They highlight that disaggregated official data are unable to fully reflect alternative grounds and aspirations of living sustainably with the environment and non-human world. Relational Indigenous epistemologies and practices contribute to alternative epistemic infrastructures. In this paper, three examples from the Andean-Pacific region provide an alternative lens through which to reconceptualize and remake the SDG landscape. Together this suite of cases highlights the importance of bottom-up articulation processes, knowledge inclusion, and alternative epistemic harmonization for operationalizing the SDGs. In particular, we highlight the urgent need to renegotiate the relationship between Indigenous communities and the global measurement infrastructure in order to pursue and realize global sustainability goals.","number":"4","urldate":"2024-04-18","journal":"Policy and Society","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Waldmüller"],"firstnames":["Johannes","M"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Yap"],"firstnames":["Mandy"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Watene"],"firstnames":["Krushil"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"December","year":"2022","pages":"471–485","bibtex":"@article{waldmuller_remaking_2022,\n\ttitle = {Remaking the {Sustainable} {Development} {Goals}: relational {Indigenous} epistemologies},\n\tvolume = {41},\n\tissn = {1449-4035},\n\tshorttitle = {Remaking the {Sustainable} {Development} {Goals}},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puac026},\n\tdoi = {10.1093/polsoc/puac026},\n\tabstract = {While the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were inclusive in their design, the reliance on official measurement infrastructures has upheld narrow definitions of both the terms of sustainability and development. Indigenous and non-Indigenous “governance beyond the state” approaches call these definitions into question. They highlight that disaggregated official data are unable to fully reflect alternative grounds and aspirations of living sustainably with the environment and non-human world. Relational Indigenous epistemologies and practices contribute to alternative epistemic infrastructures. In this paper, three examples from the Andean-Pacific region provide an alternative lens through which to reconceptualize and remake the SDG landscape. Together this suite of cases highlights the importance of bottom-up articulation processes, knowledge inclusion, and alternative epistemic harmonization for operationalizing the SDGs. In particular, we highlight the urgent need to renegotiate the relationship between Indigenous communities and the global measurement infrastructure in order to pursue and realize global sustainability goals.},\n\tnumber = {4},\n\turldate = {2024-04-18},\n\tjournal = {Policy and Society},\n\tauthor = {Waldmüller, Johannes M and Yap, Mandy and Watene, Krushil},\n\tmonth = dec,\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tpages = {471--485},\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Waldmüller, J. M","Yap, M.","Watene, K."],"key":"waldmuller_remaking_2022","id":"waldmuller_remaking_2022","bibbaseid":"waldmller-yap-watene-remakingthesustainabledevelopmentgoalsrelationalindigenousepistemologies-2022","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puac026"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero-group/iangarrett/5121790","dataSources":["fwxTPEePmtzJ25JeY","JZp2GnFw7LyN5iEyT"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["remaking","sustainable","development","goals","relational","indigenous","epistemologies","waldmüller","yap","watene"],"title":"Remaking the Sustainable Development Goals: relational Indigenous epistemologies","year":2022}