@article{waldropScience2008,
  title = {Science 2.0},
  author = {Waldrop, Mitchell M.},
  date = {2008-05},
  journaltitle = {Scientific American},
  volume = {298},
  pages = {68--73},
  issn = {0036-8733},
  doi = {10.1038/scientificamerican0508-68},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0508-68},
  abstract = {KEY CONCEPTS

 Science 2.0 generally refers to new practices of scientists who post raw experimental results, nascent theories, claims of discovery and draft papers on the Web for others to see and comment on.

 Proponents say these ” open access” practices make scientific progress more collaborative and therefore more productive.

 Critics say scientists who put preliminary findings online risk having others copy or exploit the work to gain credit or even patents.

 Despite pros and cons, Science 2.0 sites are beginning to proliferate; one notable example is the OpenWetWare project started by biological engineers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.},
  keywords = {*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-12460827,free-scientific-knowledge,knowledge-freedom,open-science,reproducible-research,science-2-0,science-ethics,scientific-knowledge-sharing},
  number = {5}
}

{"_id":"hAK468jtcJAYSvBJm","bibbaseid":"waldrop-science20","authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Waldrop, M. M."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Science 2.0","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Waldrop"],"firstnames":["Mitchell","M."],"suffixes":[]}],"date":"2008-05","journaltitle":"Scientific American","volume":"298","pages":"68–73","issn":"0036-8733","doi":"10.1038/scientificamerican0508-68","url":"https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0508-68","abstract":"KEY CONCEPTS Science 2.0 generally refers to new practices of scientists who post raw experimental results, nascent theories, claims of discovery and draft papers on the Web for others to see and comment on. Proponents say these ” open access” practices make scientific progress more collaborative and therefore more productive. Critics say scientists who put preliminary findings online risk having others copy or exploit the work to gain credit or even patents. Despite pros and cons, Science 2.0 sites are beginning to proliferate; one notable example is the OpenWetWare project started by biological engineers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.","keywords":"*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-12460827,free-scientific-knowledge,knowledge-freedom,open-science,reproducible-research,science-2-0,science-ethics,scientific-knowledge-sharing","number":"5","bibtex":"@article{waldropScience2008,\n title = {Science 2.0},\n author = {Waldrop, Mitchell M.},\n date = {2008-05},\n journaltitle = {Scientific American},\n volume = {298},\n pages = {68--73},\n issn = {0036-8733},\n doi = {10.1038/scientificamerican0508-68},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0508-68},\n abstract = {KEY CONCEPTS\n\n Science 2.0 generally refers to new practices of scientists who post raw experimental results, nascent theories, claims of discovery and draft papers on the Web for others to see and comment on.\n\n Proponents say these ” open access” practices make scientific progress more collaborative and therefore more productive.\n\n Critics say scientists who put preliminary findings online risk having others copy or exploit the work to gain credit or even patents.\n\n Despite pros and cons, Science 2.0 sites are beginning to proliferate; one notable example is the OpenWetWare project started by biological engineers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.},\n keywords = {*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-12460827,free-scientific-knowledge,knowledge-freedom,open-science,reproducible-research,science-2-0,science-ethics,scientific-knowledge-sharing},\n number = {5}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Waldrop, M. M."],"key":"waldropScience2008","id":"waldropScience2008","bibbaseid":"waldrop-science20","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0508-68"},"keyword":["*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM","~INRMM-MiD:c-12460827","free-scientific-knowledge","knowledge-freedom","open-science","reproducible-research","science-2-0","science-ethics","scientific-knowledge-sharing"],"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://tmpfiles.org/dl/58794/INRMM.bib","creationDate":"2020-07-02T22:41:32.994Z","downloads":0,"keywords":["*imported-from-citeulike-inrmm","~inrmm-mid:c-12460827","free-scientific-knowledge","knowledge-freedom","open-science","reproducible-research","science-2-0","science-ethics","scientific-knowledge-sharing"],"search_terms":["science","waldrop"],"title":"Science 2.0","year":null,"dataSources":["DXuKbcZTirdigFKPF"]}