Archaeology, the Digital Humanities, and the “Big Tent”. Watrall, E. In Gold, M. K. & Klein, L. F., editors, Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016, pages 345–358. University of Minnesota Press, 2016. 🏷️ /unread![Archaeology, the Digital Humanities, and the “Big Tent” [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper abstract bibtex There has been much discussion about “the big tent” as the metaphor that defines and delineates the boundaries of the digital humanities. In some cases, such as at the University College London Centre for Digital Humanities (Warwick et al.), the “big tent” is framed quite broadly, defined not by traditional disciplinary boundaries but by practice. Kathleen Fitzpatrick,¹ on the other hand, defines the “big tent” as “a nexus of fields within which scholars use computing technologies to investigate the kinds of questions that are traditional to the humanities, or, as is more true of [her] own work, who ask traditional 【摘要翻译】关于 "大帐篷 "作为界定和划分数字人文科学界限的隐喻，已经有很多讨论。在某些情况下，例如在伦敦大学学院数字人文中心（沃里克等人），"大帐篷 "的框架相当宽泛，不是由传统的学科界限而是由实践来定义。另一方面，凯瑟琳-菲茨帕特里克¹将 "大帐篷 "定义为 "学者们利用计算机技术研究人文学科传统问题的领域的纽带，或者，就她自己的工作而言，提出传统问题的学者"。
@incollection{watrall2016,
title = {Archaeology, the {Digital} {Humanities}, and the “{Big} {Tent}”},
isbn = {978-0-8166-9954-4},
shorttitle = {考古学、数字人文学科与 "大帐篷"},
url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt1cn6thb.31},
abstract = {There has been much discussion about “the big tent” as the metaphor that defines and delineates the boundaries of the digital humanities. In some cases, such as at the University College London Centre for Digital Humanities (Warwick et al.), the “big tent” is framed quite broadly, defined not by traditional disciplinary boundaries but by practice. Kathleen Fitzpatrick,¹ on the other hand, defines the “big tent” as “a nexus of fields within which scholars use computing technologies to investigate the kinds of questions that are traditional to the humanities, or, as is more true of [her] own work, who ask traditional
【摘要翻译】关于 "大帐篷 "作为界定和划分数字人文科学界限的隐喻，已经有很多讨论。在某些情况下，例如在伦敦大学学院数字人文中心（沃里克等人），"大帐篷 "的框架相当宽泛，不是由传统的学科界限而是由实践来定义。另一方面，凯瑟琳-菲茨帕特里克¹将 "大帐篷 "定义为 "学者们利用计算机技术研究人文学科传统问题的领域的纽带，或者，就她自己的工作而言，提出传统问题的学者"。},
language = {en},
urldate = {2021-03-07},
booktitle = {Debates in the {Digital} {Humanities} 2016},
publisher = {University of Minnesota Press},
author = {Watrall, Ethan},
editor = {Gold, Matthew K. and Klein, Lauren F.},
year = {2016},
note = {🏷️ /unread},
keywords = {/unread},
pages = {345--358},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"RqmsEsN6QYWjZ6YJt","bibbaseid":"watrall-archaeologythedigitalhumanitiesandthebigtent-2016","author_short":["Watrall, E."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"incollection","type":"incollection","title":"Archaeology, the Digital Humanities, and the “Big Tent”","isbn":"978-0-8166-9954-4","shorttitle":"考古学、数字人文学科与 \"大帐篷\"","url":"http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt1cn6thb.31","abstract":"There has been much discussion about “the big tent” as the metaphor that defines and delineates the boundaries of the digital humanities. In some cases, such as at the University College London Centre for Digital Humanities (Warwick et al.), the “big tent” is framed quite broadly, defined not by traditional disciplinary boundaries but by practice. Kathleen Fitzpatrick,¹ on the other hand, defines the “big tent” as “a nexus of fields within which scholars use computing technologies to investigate the kinds of questions that are traditional to the humanities, or, as is more true of [her] own work, who ask traditional 【摘要翻译】关于 \"大帐篷 \"作为界定和划分数字人文科学界限的隐喻，已经有很多讨论。在某些情况下，例如在伦敦大学学院数字人文中心（沃里克等人），\"大帐篷 \"的框架相当宽泛，不是由传统的学科界限而是由实践来定义。另一方面，凯瑟琳-菲茨帕特里克¹将 \"大帐篷 \"定义为 \"学者们利用计算机技术研究人文学科传统问题的领域的纽带，或者，就她自己的工作而言，提出传统问题的学者\"。","language":"en","urldate":"2021-03-07","booktitle":"Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016","publisher":"University of Minnesota Press","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Watrall"],"firstnames":["Ethan"],"suffixes":[]}],"editor":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Gold"],"firstnames":["Matthew","K."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Klein"],"firstnames":["Lauren","F."],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2016","note":"🏷️ /unread","keywords":"/unread","pages":"345–358","bibtex":"@incollection{watrall2016,\n\ttitle = {Archaeology, the {Digital} {Humanities}, and the “{Big} {Tent}”},\n\tisbn = {978-0-8166-9954-4},\n\tshorttitle = {考古学、数字人文学科与 \"大帐篷\"},\n\turl = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt1cn6thb.31},\n\tabstract = {There has been much discussion about “the big tent” as the metaphor that defines and delineates the boundaries of the digital humanities. In some cases, such as at the University College London Centre for Digital Humanities (Warwick et al.), the “big tent” is framed quite broadly, defined not by traditional disciplinary boundaries but by practice. Kathleen Fitzpatrick,¹ on the other hand, defines the “big tent” as “a nexus of fields within which scholars use computing technologies to investigate the kinds of questions that are traditional to the humanities, or, as is more true of [her] own work, who ask traditional\n\n【摘要翻译】关于 \"大帐篷 \"作为界定和划分数字人文科学界限的隐喻，已经有很多讨论。在某些情况下，例如在伦敦大学学院数字人文中心（沃里克等人），\"大帐篷 \"的框架相当宽泛，不是由传统的学科界限而是由实践来定义。另一方面，凯瑟琳-菲茨帕特里克¹将 \"大帐篷 \"定义为 \"学者们利用计算机技术研究人文学科传统问题的领域的纽带，或者，就她自己的工作而言，提出传统问题的学者\"。},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2021-03-07},\n\tbooktitle = {Debates in the {Digital} {Humanities} 2016},\n\tpublisher = {University of Minnesota Press},\n\tauthor = {Watrall, Ethan},\n\teditor = {Gold, Matthew K. and Klein, Lauren F.},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tnote = {🏷️ /unread},\n\tkeywords = {/unread},\n\tpages = {345--358},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Watrall, E."],"editor_short":["Gold, M. K.","Klein, L. F."],"key":"watrall2016","id":"watrall2016","bibbaseid":"watrall-archaeologythedigitalhumanitiesandthebigtent-2016","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt1cn6thb.31"},"keyword":["/unread"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"incollection","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/groups/2386895/collections/Y3QIGY5X/items?format=bibtex&limit=100","dataSources":["iC76hZbMPQr3su9Sj","djXvybraQNYeH3Azr"],"keywords":["/unread"],"search_terms":["archaeology","digital","humanities","big","tent","watrall"],"title":"Archaeology, the Digital Humanities, and the “Big Tent”","year":2016}