EVACUATION, HYGIENE, AND SOCIAL POLICY: THE OUR TOWNS REPORT OF 1943. Welshman, J. The Historical Journal, 42(3):781–807, September, 1999. ZSCC: 0000045
EVACUATION, HYGIENE, AND SOCIAL POLICY: THE OUR TOWNS REPORT OF 1943 [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
There has recently been much debate about social policy in Britain during the Second World War. This article takes up Jose Harris's suggestion that historians should look not at large-scale forces, but at ‘those minuscule roots of idiosyncratic private culture’. As a way into the complex amalgam that comprised ideas on social policy in the 1940s, we look in particular at the report on the evacuation of schoolchildren entitled Our towns: a close up, published by the Women's Group on Public Welfare in March 1943. Of course it is undeniable that one report is unrepresentative of all the many surveys that were produced on the evacuation experience. However, the initial wave of evacuation in September 1939 was the most significant, and the Our towns survey, along with a famous leader article in The Economist, has already received some selective attention from historians. Here we subject the survey to a more intensive examination, looking at the backgrounds of its authors, its content, and its reception by various professional groups. The article argues that it was the apparently contradictory nature of the report that explains its powerful appeal – it echoed interwar debates about behaviour and citizenship, but also reflected the ideas that would shape the welfare state in the post-war years.
@article{welshman_evacuation_1999,
	title = {{EVACUATION}, {HYGIENE}, {AND} {SOCIAL} {POLICY}: {THE} {OUR} {TOWNS} {REPORT} {OF} 1943},
	volume = {42},
	issn = {1469-5103, 0018-246X},
	shorttitle = {{EVACUATION}, {HYGIENE}, {AND} {SOCIAL} {POLICY}},
	url = {http://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/historical-journal/article/evacuation-hygiene-and-social-policy-the-our-towns-report-of-1943/177975F9456FD16A76ADC785E8D8990E},
	doi = {10.1017/S0018246X99008638},
	abstract = {There has recently been much debate about social policy in Britain during the Second
World War. This article takes up Jose Harris's suggestion that historians should look not at large-scale forces, but at ‘those minuscule roots of idiosyncratic private culture’. As a way into the complex
amalgam that comprised ideas on social policy in the 1940s, we look in particular at the report on the
evacuation of schoolchildren entitled Our towns: a close up, published by the Women's Group on
Public Welfare in March 1943. Of course it is undeniable that one report is unrepresentative of all
the many surveys that were produced on the evacuation experience. However, the initial wave of
evacuation in September 1939 was the most significant, and the Our towns survey, along with a
famous leader article in The Economist, has already received some selective attention from
historians. Here we subject the survey to a more intensive examination, looking at the backgrounds of
its authors, its content, and its reception by various professional groups. The article argues that it was
the apparently contradictory nature of the report that explains its powerful appeal – it echoed interwar
debates about behaviour and citizenship, but also reflected the ideas that would shape the welfare state
in the post-war years.},
	language = {en},
	number = {3},
	urldate = {2020-02-03},
	journal = {The Historical Journal},
	author = {Welshman, John},
	month = sep,
	year = {1999},
	note = {ZSCC: 0000045},
	keywords = {more than 5 citations},
	pages = {781--807}
}

Downloads: 0