Exhaustivity through the maxim of Relation. Westera, M. In Proceedings of Logic and Engineering of Natural Language Semantics (LENLS 10), 2013. This work has been presented at several occasions. Here are the slides from the Semantics/Pragmatics Colloquium at the Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, November 18, 2013: https://www.dropbox.com/s/b49swb2xjg5hapy/Westera%202013%20-%20Nijmegen%20slides.pdf . A complete list of presentations and slideshows is available here: http://staff.science.uva.nl/ westera/publications.shtml .
Paper abstract bibtex I show that the exhaustive interpretation of answers can be explained as a conversational implicature through the Maxim of Relation, dealing with the problematic epistemic step (Sauerland, 2004). I assume a fairly standard Maxim of Relation, that captures the same intuition as Roberts' (1996) contextual entailment. I show that if a richer notion of meaning is adopted, in particular that of attentive semantics (Roelofsen, 2011), this Maxim of Relation automatically becomes strong enough to enable exhaustivity implicatures. The results suggest that pragmatic reasoning is sensitive not only to the information an utterance provides, but also to the possibilities it draws attention to. Foremost, it shows that exhaustivity implicatures can be genuine conversational implicatures.
@inproceedings{Westera:13lenls,
abstract = {I show that the exhaustive interpretation of answers can be explained as a conversational implicature through the Maxim of Relation, dealing with the problematic epistemic step (Sauerland, 2004). I assume a fairly standard Maxim of Relation, that captures the same intuition as Roberts' (1996) contextual entailment. I show that if a richer notion of meaning is adopted, in particular that of attentive semantics (Roelofsen, 2011), this Maxim of Relation automatically becomes strong enough to enable exhaustivity implicatures. The results suggest that pragmatic reasoning is sensitive not only to the information an utterance provides, but also to the possibilities it draws attention to. Foremost, it shows that exhaustivity implicatures can be genuine conversational implicatures.},
author = {Matthijs Westera},
booktitle = {Proceedings of Logic and Engineering of Natural Language Semantics (LENLS 10)},
date-added = {2021-08-17 00:00:00 +0000},
date-modified = {2021-08-17 00:00:00 +0000},
keywords = {inquisitive pragmatics},
note = {This work has been presented at several occasions. Here are the slides from the Semantics/Pragmatics Colloquium at the Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, November 18, 2013: https://www.dropbox.com/s/b49swb2xjg5hapy/Westera%202013%20-%20Nijmegen%20slides.pdf . A complete list of presentations and slideshows is available here: http://staff.science.uva.nl/~westera/publications.shtml .},
title = {Exhaustivity through the maxim of {Relation}},
url = {http://mwestera.humanities.uva.nl/downloads/Westera%202013%20-%20exhaustivity%20LENLS%20final.pdf},
year = {2013},
Bdsk-Url-1 = {https://www.dropbox.com/s/g466a4u653mkdgs/Westera%202013%20-%20exhaustivity%20LENLS%20final.pdf}}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"3oSFuRpms5K6NfHxN","bibbaseid":"westera-exhaustivitythroughthemaximofrelation-2013","author_short":["Westera, M."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"inproceedings","type":"inproceedings","abstract":"I show that the exhaustive interpretation of answers can be explained as a conversational implicature through the Maxim of Relation, dealing with the problematic epistemic step (Sauerland, 2004). I assume a fairly standard Maxim of Relation, that captures the same intuition as Roberts' (1996) contextual entailment. I show that if a richer notion of meaning is adopted, in particular that of attentive semantics (Roelofsen, 2011), this Maxim of Relation automatically becomes strong enough to enable exhaustivity implicatures. The results suggest that pragmatic reasoning is sensitive not only to the information an utterance provides, but also to the possibilities it draws attention to. Foremost, it shows that exhaustivity implicatures can be genuine conversational implicatures.","author":[{"firstnames":["Matthijs"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Westera"],"suffixes":[]}],"booktitle":"Proceedings of Logic and Engineering of Natural Language Semantics (LENLS 10)","date-added":"2021-08-17 00:00:00 +0000","date-modified":"2021-08-17 00:00:00 +0000","keywords":"inquisitive pragmatics","note":"This work has been presented at several occasions. Here are the slides from the Semantics/Pragmatics Colloquium at the Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, November 18, 2013: https://www.dropbox.com/s/b49swb2xjg5hapy/Westera%202013%20-%20Nijmegen%20slides.pdf . A complete list of presentations and slideshows is available here: http://staff.science.uva.nl/ westera/publications.shtml .","title":"Exhaustivity through the maxim of Relation","url":"http://mwestera.humanities.uva.nl/downloads/Westera%202013%20-%20exhaustivity%20LENLS%20final.pdf","year":"2013","bdsk-url-1":"https://www.dropbox.com/s/g466a4u653mkdgs/Westera%202013%20-%20exhaustivity%20LENLS%20final.pdf","bibtex":"@inproceedings{Westera:13lenls,\n\tabstract = {I show that the exhaustive interpretation of answers can be explained as a conversational implicature through the Maxim of Relation, dealing with the problematic epistemic step (Sauerland, 2004). I assume a fairly standard Maxim of Relation, that captures the same intuition as Roberts' (1996) contextual entailment. I show that if a richer notion of meaning is adopted, in particular that of attentive semantics (Roelofsen, 2011), this Maxim of Relation automatically becomes strong enough to enable exhaustivity implicatures. The results suggest that pragmatic reasoning is sensitive not only to the information an utterance provides, but also to the possibilities it draws attention to. Foremost, it shows that exhaustivity implicatures can be genuine conversational implicatures.},\n\tauthor = {Matthijs Westera},\n\tbooktitle = {Proceedings of Logic and Engineering of Natural Language Semantics (LENLS 10)},\n\tdate-added = {2021-08-17 00:00:00 +0000},\n\tdate-modified = {2021-08-17 00:00:00 +0000},\n\tkeywords = {inquisitive pragmatics},\n\tnote = {This work has been presented at several occasions. Here are the slides from the Semantics/Pragmatics Colloquium at the Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, November 18, 2013: https://www.dropbox.com/s/b49swb2xjg5hapy/Westera%202013%20-%20Nijmegen%20slides.pdf . A complete list of presentations and slideshows is available here: http://staff.science.uva.nl/~westera/publications.shtml .},\n\ttitle = {Exhaustivity through the maxim of {Relation}},\n\turl = {http://mwestera.humanities.uva.nl/downloads/Westera%202013%20-%20exhaustivity%20LENLS%20final.pdf},\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tBdsk-Url-1 = {https://www.dropbox.com/s/g466a4u653mkdgs/Westera%202013%20-%20exhaustivity%20LENLS%20final.pdf}}\n\n","author_short":["Westera, M."],"key":"Westera:13lenls","id":"Westera:13lenls","bibbaseid":"westera-exhaustivitythroughthemaximofrelation-2013","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://mwestera.humanities.uva.nl/downloads/Westera%202013%20-%20exhaustivity%20LENLS%20final.pdf"},"keyword":["inquisitive pragmatics"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"inproceedings","biburl":"https://projects.illc.uva.nl/inquisitivesemantics/assets/files/papers.bib","dataSources":["x2Aox4ZP7RsyuDjWX","LaLDs2mrYhQpgH6Lk"],"keywords":["inquisitive pragmatics"],"search_terms":["exhaustivity","through","maxim","relation","westera"],"title":"Exhaustivity through the maxim of Relation","year":2013}