Canon, sex and gender in Theodoret of Cyrus’s exposition of LXX Ruth. Wet, C. L. d. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 78(1):7, October, 2022. Number: 1Paper doi abstract bibtex The purpose of this article is to examine Theodoret of Cyrus’s (ca. 393–ca. 457 CE) exposition of LXX Ruth, as found in his Questions on the Octateuch. At the centre of this analysis lies the question of what an early Christian author like Theodoret, who lives in a context where asceticism and sexual renunciation were quite popular (i.e. Christian Syria), does with a complicated text like Ruth, which contains so many explicit nuances about sex, procreation and marriage, as well as various gendered complexities. The article starts by examining briefly the canonisation history of Ruth in early Christianity and some of the main interpretative trends in readings of Ruth by other Christian authors. Then, Theodoret’s interpretation of Ruth is examined, focusing specifically on his Questions on Ruth. The purpose of Ruth as scripture, according to Theodoret, is first delineated, after which Theodoret’s approach to sex and gender in LXX Ruth is examined. Contribution: This article argues that Theodoret transforms the story of Ruth into one that aligns with the moral-philosophical discourse related to sex, marriage and gender of his own time. Theodoret restructures Ruth androcentrically by placing Boaz, the masculine and virtuous male father-figure, at the centre of the story, while at the same time stripping Ruth of any possible agency she might have as a would-be temptress.
@article{wet_canon_2022,
title = {Canon, sex and gender in {Theodoret} of {Cyrus}’s exposition of {LXX} {Ruth}},
volume = {78},
copyright = {Copyright (c) 2022 Chris L. de Wet},
issn = {2072-8050},
url = {https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/7730},
doi = {10.4102/hts.v78i1.7730},
abstract = {The purpose of this article is to examine Theodoret of Cyrus’s (ca. 393–ca. 457 CE) exposition of LXX Ruth, as found in his Questions on the Octateuch. At the centre of this analysis lies the question of what an early Christian author like Theodoret, who lives in a context where asceticism and sexual renunciation were quite popular (i.e. Christian Syria), does with a complicated text like Ruth, which contains so many explicit nuances about sex, procreation and marriage, as well as various gendered complexities. The article starts by examining briefly the canonisation history of Ruth in early Christianity and some of the main interpretative trends in readings of Ruth by other Christian authors. Then, Theodoret’s interpretation of Ruth is examined, focusing specifically on his Questions on Ruth. The purpose of Ruth as scripture, according to Theodoret, is first delineated, after which Theodoret’s approach to sex and gender in LXX Ruth is examined. Contribution: This article argues that Theodoret transforms the story of Ruth into one that aligns with the moral-philosophical discourse related to sex, marriage and gender of his own time. Theodoret restructures Ruth androcentrically by placing Boaz, the masculine and virtuous male father-figure, at the centre of the story, while at the same time stripping Ruth of any possible agency she might have as a would-be temptress.},
language = {en},
number = {1},
urldate = {2022-10-15},
journal = {HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies},
author = {Wet, Chris L. de},
month = oct,
year = {2022},
note = {Number: 1},
pages = {7},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"ib2HLsHEpWDMypiDC","bibbaseid":"wet-canonsexandgenderintheodoretofcyrussexpositionoflxxruth-2022","author_short":["Wet, C. L. d."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Canon, sex and gender in Theodoret of Cyrus’s exposition of LXX Ruth","volume":"78","copyright":"Copyright (c) 2022 Chris L. de Wet","issn":"2072-8050","url":"https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/7730","doi":"10.4102/hts.v78i1.7730","abstract":"The purpose of this article is to examine Theodoret of Cyrus’s (ca. 393–ca. 457 CE) exposition of LXX Ruth, as found in his Questions on the Octateuch. At the centre of this analysis lies the question of what an early Christian author like Theodoret, who lives in a context where asceticism and sexual renunciation were quite popular (i.e. Christian Syria), does with a complicated text like Ruth, which contains so many explicit nuances about sex, procreation and marriage, as well as various gendered complexities. The article starts by examining briefly the canonisation history of Ruth in early Christianity and some of the main interpretative trends in readings of Ruth by other Christian authors. Then, Theodoret’s interpretation of Ruth is examined, focusing specifically on his Questions on Ruth. The purpose of Ruth as scripture, according to Theodoret, is first delineated, after which Theodoret’s approach to sex and gender in LXX Ruth is examined. Contribution: This article argues that Theodoret transforms the story of Ruth into one that aligns with the moral-philosophical discourse related to sex, marriage and gender of his own time. Theodoret restructures Ruth androcentrically by placing Boaz, the masculine and virtuous male father-figure, at the centre of the story, while at the same time stripping Ruth of any possible agency she might have as a would-be temptress.","language":"en","number":"1","urldate":"2022-10-15","journal":"HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Wet"],"firstnames":["Chris","L.","de"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"October","year":"2022","note":"Number: 1","pages":"7","bibtex":"@article{wet_canon_2022,\n\ttitle = {Canon, sex and gender in {Theodoret} of {Cyrus}’s exposition of {LXX} {Ruth}},\n\tvolume = {78},\n\tcopyright = {Copyright (c) 2022 Chris L. de Wet},\n\tissn = {2072-8050},\n\turl = {https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/7730},\n\tdoi = {10.4102/hts.v78i1.7730},\n\tabstract = {The purpose of this article is to examine Theodoret of Cyrus’s (ca. 393–ca. 457 CE) exposition of LXX Ruth, as found in his Questions on the Octateuch. At the centre of this analysis lies the question of what an early Christian author like Theodoret, who lives in a context where asceticism and sexual renunciation were quite popular (i.e. Christian Syria), does with a complicated text like Ruth, which contains so many explicit nuances about sex, procreation and marriage, as well as various gendered complexities. The article starts by examining briefly the canonisation history of Ruth in early Christianity and some of the main interpretative trends in readings of Ruth by other Christian authors. Then, Theodoret’s interpretation of Ruth is examined, focusing specifically on his Questions on Ruth. The purpose of Ruth as scripture, according to Theodoret, is first delineated, after which Theodoret’s approach to sex and gender in LXX Ruth is examined. Contribution: This article argues that Theodoret transforms the story of Ruth into one that aligns with the moral-philosophical discourse related to sex, marriage and gender of his own time. Theodoret restructures Ruth androcentrically by placing Boaz, the masculine and virtuous male father-figure, at the centre of the story, while at the same time stripping Ruth of any possible agency she might have as a would-be temptress.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2022-10-15},\n\tjournal = {HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies},\n\tauthor = {Wet, Chris L. de},\n\tmonth = oct,\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tnote = {Number: 1},\n\tpages = {7},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Wet, C. L. d."],"key":"wet_canon_2022","id":"wet_canon_2022","bibbaseid":"wet-canonsexandgenderintheodoretofcyrussexpositionoflxxruth-2022","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/7730"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/mimagree","dataSources":["AXusoRBcQfTAj3g6r"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["canon","sex","gender","theodoret","cyrus","exposition","lxx","ruth","wet"],"title":"Canon, sex and gender in Theodoret of Cyrus’s exposition of LXX Ruth","year":2022}