Monkeys crying wolf? Tufted capuchin monkeys use anti-predator calls to usurp resources from conspecifics. Wheeler, B. C Proc Biol Sci, 276(1669):3013-8, 2009. doi abstract bibtex The use of 'tactical deception' is argued to have been important in the cognitive evolution of the order Primates, but systematic studies of active deception in wild non-human primates are scant. This study tests whether wild tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella nigritus) use alarm calls in a functionally deceptive manner to usurp food resources. If capuchins use alarm calls 'deceptively', it was predicted that false alarms should be: (i) given by subordinates more than by dominants, (ii) more frequent when food is most contestable, (iii) more frequent when less food is available, and (iv) given when the caller is in a spatial position in which it could increase its feeding success if conspecifics react to the call. These predictions were tested by observing subjects in experimental contexts, in which the amount and distribution of a high-value resource (banana pieces) were manipulated using wooden platforms suspended from tree branches. While false alarms were non-significantly more common when more food was available, the three remaining predictions were supported. These results generally support the hypothesis that alarm calls are used by capuchins to reduce the effects of feeding competition. Whether this is intentional on the part of the caller requires further investigation.
@Article{Wheeler2009,
author = {Brandon C Wheeler},
journal = {Proc Biol Sci},
title = {Monkeys crying wolf? {T}ufted capuchin monkeys use anti-predator calls to usurp resources from conspecifics.},
year = {2009},
number = {1669},
pages = {3013-8},
volume = {276},
abstract = {The use of 'tactical deception' is argued to have been important in
the cognitive evolution of the order Primates, but systematic studies
of active deception in wild non-human primates are scant. This study
tests whether wild tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella nigritus)
use alarm calls in a functionally deceptive manner to usurp food
resources. If capuchins use alarm calls 'deceptively', it was predicted
that false alarms should be: (i) given by subordinates more than
by dominants, (ii) more frequent when food is most contestable, (iii)
more frequent when less food is available, and (iv) given when the
caller is in a spatial position in which it could increase its feeding
success if conspecifics react to the call. These predictions were
tested by observing subjects in experimental contexts, in which the
amount and distribution of a high-value resource (banana pieces)
were manipulated using wooden platforms suspended from tree branches.
While false alarms were non-significantly more common when more food
was available, the three remaining predictions were supported. These
results generally support the hypothesis that alarm calls are used
by capuchins to reduce the effects of feeding competition. Whether
this is intentional on the part of the caller requires further investigation.},
doi = {10.1098/rspb.2009.0544},
keywords = {Animal, Animals, Cebus, Deception, Feeding Behavior, Vocalization, 19493903},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"z52fSuCf3vx6mz8N8","bibbaseid":"wheeler-monkeyscryingwolftuftedcapuchinmonkeysuseantipredatorcallstousurpresourcesfromconspecifics-2009","author_short":["Wheeler, B. C"],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","author":[{"firstnames":["Brandon","C"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Wheeler"],"suffixes":[]}],"journal":"Proc Biol Sci","title":"Monkeys crying wolf? Tufted capuchin monkeys use anti-predator calls to usurp resources from conspecifics.","year":"2009","number":"1669","pages":"3013-8","volume":"276","abstract":"The use of 'tactical deception' is argued to have been important in the cognitive evolution of the order Primates, but systematic studies of active deception in wild non-human primates are scant. This study tests whether wild tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella nigritus) use alarm calls in a functionally deceptive manner to usurp food resources. If capuchins use alarm calls 'deceptively', it was predicted that false alarms should be: (i) given by subordinates more than by dominants, (ii) more frequent when food is most contestable, (iii) more frequent when less food is available, and (iv) given when the caller is in a spatial position in which it could increase its feeding success if conspecifics react to the call. These predictions were tested by observing subjects in experimental contexts, in which the amount and distribution of a high-value resource (banana pieces) were manipulated using wooden platforms suspended from tree branches. While false alarms were non-significantly more common when more food was available, the three remaining predictions were supported. These results generally support the hypothesis that alarm calls are used by capuchins to reduce the effects of feeding competition. Whether this is intentional on the part of the caller requires further investigation.","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2009.0544","keywords":"Animal, Animals, Cebus, Deception, Feeding Behavior, Vocalization, 19493903","bibtex":"@Article{Wheeler2009,\n author = {Brandon C Wheeler},\n journal = {Proc Biol Sci},\n title = {Monkeys crying wolf? {T}ufted capuchin monkeys use anti-predator calls to usurp resources from conspecifics.},\n year = {2009},\n number = {1669},\n pages = {3013-8},\n volume = {276},\n abstract = {The use of 'tactical deception' is argued to have been important in\n\tthe cognitive evolution of the order Primates, but systematic studies\n\tof active deception in wild non-human primates are scant. This study\n\ttests whether wild tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella nigritus)\n\tuse alarm calls in a functionally deceptive manner to usurp food\n\tresources. If capuchins use alarm calls 'deceptively', it was predicted\n\tthat false alarms should be: (i) given by subordinates more than\n\tby dominants, (ii) more frequent when food is most contestable, (iii)\n\tmore frequent when less food is available, and (iv) given when the\n\tcaller is in a spatial position in which it could increase its feeding\n\tsuccess if conspecifics react to the call. These predictions were\n\ttested by observing subjects in experimental contexts, in which the\n\tamount and distribution of a high-value resource (banana pieces)\n\twere manipulated using wooden platforms suspended from tree branches.\n\tWhile false alarms were non-significantly more common when more food\n\twas available, the three remaining predictions were supported. These\n\tresults generally support the hypothesis that alarm calls are used\n\tby capuchins to reduce the effects of feeding competition. Whether\n\tthis is intentional on the part of the caller requires further investigation.},\n doi = {10.1098/rspb.2009.0544},\n keywords = {Animal, Animals, Cebus, Deception, Feeding Behavior, Vocalization, 19493903},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Wheeler, B. C"],"key":"Wheeler2009","id":"Wheeler2009","bibbaseid":"wheeler-monkeyscryingwolftuftedcapuchinmonkeysuseantipredatorcallstousurpresourcesfromconspecifics-2009","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["Animal","Animals","Cebus","Deception","Feeding Behavior","Vocalization","19493903"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://endress.org/publications/ansgar.bib","dataSources":["xPGxHAeh3vZpx4yyE","TXa55dQbNoWnaGmMq"],"keywords":["animal","animals","cebus","deception","feeding behavior","vocalization","19493903"],"search_terms":["monkeys","crying","wolf","tufted","capuchin","monkeys","use","anti","predator","calls","usurp","resources","conspecifics","wheeler"],"title":"Monkeys crying wolf? Tufted capuchin monkeys use anti-predator calls to usurp resources from conspecifics.","year":2009}