@article{ wilson_lovejoys_1987,
  title = {Lovejoy's the Great Chain of Being after Fifty Years},
  volume = {48},
  issn = {00225037},
  url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/2709553},
  abstract = {This essay examines the historiographical and critical literature surrounding lovejoy's "the great chain of being". This literature falls into two categories: that which takes issue with lovejoy's interpretations of particular thinkers, And that which finds fault with his methodology, Especially with his notion of the unit-Idea. It concludes that lovejoy's interpretations are reasonable given his intellectual framework, And that his methodology and the unit-Idea, As recently modified, Are still useful in studying the history of ideas.},
  number = {2},
  journal = {Journal of the History of Ideas},
  author = {Wilson, Daniel J},
  year = {1987},
  pages = {187}
}

{"_id":"4nddm4Ppd5dGYe5P3","authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Wilson","J, D."],"bibbaseid":"wilson-j-lovejoysthegreatchainofbeingafterfiftyyears-1987","bibdata":{"abstract":"This essay examines the historiographical and critical literature surrounding lovejoy's \"the great chain of being\". This literature falls into two categories: that which takes issue with lovejoy's interpretations of particular thinkers, And that which finds fault with his methodology, Especially with his notion of the unit-Idea. It concludes that lovejoy's interpretations are reasonable given his intellectual framework, And that his methodology and the unit-Idea, As recently modified, Are still useful in studying the history of ideas.","author":["Wilson","J, Daniel"],"author_short":["Wilson","J, D."],"bibtex":"@article{ wilson_lovejoys_1987,\n title = {Lovejoy's the Great Chain of Being after Fifty Years},\n volume = {48},\n issn = {00225037},\n url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/2709553},\n abstract = {This essay examines the historiographical and critical literature surrounding lovejoy's \"the great chain of being\". This literature falls into two categories: that which takes issue with lovejoy's interpretations of particular thinkers, And that which finds fault with his methodology, Especially with his notion of the unit-Idea. It concludes that lovejoy's interpretations are reasonable given his intellectual framework, And that his methodology and the unit-Idea, As recently modified, Are still useful in studying the history of ideas.},\n number = {2},\n journal = {Journal of the History of Ideas},\n author = {Wilson, Daniel J},\n year = {1987},\n pages = {187}\n}","bibtype":"article","id":"wilson_lovejoys_1987","issn":"00225037","journal":"Journal of the History of Ideas","key":"wilson_lovejoys_1987","number":"2","pages":"187","title":"Lovejoy's the Great Chain of Being after Fifty Years","type":"article","url":"http://www.jstor.org/stable/2709553","volume":"48","year":"1987","bibbaseid":"wilson-j-lovejoysthegreatchainofbeingafterfiftyyears-1987","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://www.jstor.org/stable/2709553"},"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/groups/309949/items?key=DGAl7elYnYLuT7emrhuhOoJ7&format=bibtex&limit=100","creationDate":"2014-11-27T11:18:19.860Z","downloads":0,"keywords":[],"search_terms":["lovejoy","great","chain","being","fifty","years","wilson","j"],"title":"Lovejoy's the Great Chain of Being after Fifty Years","year":1987,"dataSources":["ijpZgzd7ExnHyN6ka"]}