Alternative Disjunctions in Egyptian Arabic. Winans, L. 2012. UCLA MA thesis, pre-final draft![Alternative Disjunctions in Egyptian Arabic [pdf]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/pdf.svg "pdf")
Paper abstract bibtex Languages such as Chinese (Li and Thomson (1981)), Finnish (Haspelmath (2007)), Basque (Saltarelli (1988)), and Malagasy (Keenan, p.c.), among others, have been described as having two disjunctive lexical items where one, the interrogative disjunction is restricted to questions and the other, the standard disjunction occurs in all clause types. In this paper, I look at two such items in Egyptian Arabic—wallaa and aw—that conform to Haspelmath's descriptions of interrogative and standard disjunctions, respectively. Using Inquisitive Semantics (Ciardelli et al. (2012), Groenendijk and Roelofsen (2009), Ciardelli and Roelofsen (2011), inter alia), the differences between wallaa and aw can be captured as a difference in inquisitiveness. While this analysis accounts for the observed data in Egyptian Arabic, it also explains why the cross-linguistic data patterns as it does.
@unpublished{Winans:12,
abstract = {Languages such as Chinese (Li and Thomson (1981)), Finnish (Haspelmath (2007)), Basque (Saltarelli (1988)), and Malagasy (Keenan, p.c.), among others, have been described as having two disjunctive lexical items where one, the interrogative disjunction is restricted to questions and the other, the standard disjunction occurs in all clause types. In this paper, I look at two such items in Egyptian Arabic---wallaa and aw---that conform to Haspelmath's descriptions of interrogative and standard disjunctions, respectively. Using Inquisitive Semantics (Ciardelli et al. (2012), Groenendijk and Roelofsen (2009), Ciardelli and Roelofsen (2011), inter alia), the differences between wallaa and aw can be captured as a difference in inquisitiveness. While this analysis accounts for the observed data in Egyptian Arabic, it also explains why the cross-linguistic data patterns as it does.},
author = {Lauren Winans},
date-added = {2021-08-17 00:00:00 +0000},
date-modified = {2021-08-17 00:00:00 +0000},
note = {UCLA MA thesis, pre-final draft},
title = {{Alternative Disjunctions in Egyptian Arabic}},
url = {https://projects.illc.uva.nl/inquisitivesemantics/assets/files/theses/Winans2012_MAthesis-draft.pdf},
year = {2012},
Bdsk-Url-1 = {https://projects.illc.uva.nl/inquisitivesemantics/assets/files/theses/Winans2012_MAthesis-draft.pdf}}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"WtccL8qzdovZAG3B9","bibbaseid":"winans-alternativedisjunctionsinegyptianarabic-2012","author_short":["Winans, L."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"unpublished","type":"unpublished","abstract":"Languages such as Chinese (Li and Thomson (1981)), Finnish (Haspelmath (2007)), Basque (Saltarelli (1988)), and Malagasy (Keenan, p.c.), among others, have been described as having two disjunctive lexical items where one, the interrogative disjunction is restricted to questions and the other, the standard disjunction occurs in all clause types. In this paper, I look at two such items in Egyptian Arabic—wallaa and aw—that conform to Haspelmath's descriptions of interrogative and standard disjunctions, respectively. Using Inquisitive Semantics (Ciardelli et al. (2012), Groenendijk and Roelofsen (2009), Ciardelli and Roelofsen (2011), inter alia), the differences between wallaa and aw can be captured as a difference in inquisitiveness. While this analysis accounts for the observed data in Egyptian Arabic, it also explains why the cross-linguistic data patterns as it does.","author":[{"firstnames":["Lauren"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Winans"],"suffixes":[]}],"date-added":"2021-08-17 00:00:00 +0000","date-modified":"2021-08-17 00:00:00 +0000","note":"UCLA MA thesis, pre-final draft","title":"Alternative Disjunctions in Egyptian Arabic","url":"https://projects.illc.uva.nl/inquisitivesemantics/assets/files/theses/Winans2012_MAthesis-draft.pdf","year":"2012","bdsk-url-1":"https://projects.illc.uva.nl/inquisitivesemantics/assets/files/theses/Winans2012_MAthesis-draft.pdf","bibtex":"@unpublished{Winans:12,\n\tabstract = {Languages such as Chinese (Li and Thomson (1981)), Finnish (Haspelmath (2007)), Basque (Saltarelli (1988)), and Malagasy (Keenan, p.c.), among others, have been described as having two disjunctive lexical items where one, the interrogative disjunction is restricted to questions and the other, the standard disjunction occurs in all clause types. In this paper, I look at two such items in Egyptian Arabic---wallaa and aw---that conform to Haspelmath's descriptions of interrogative and standard disjunctions, respectively. Using Inquisitive Semantics (Ciardelli et al. (2012), Groenendijk and Roelofsen (2009), Ciardelli and Roelofsen (2011), inter alia), the differences between wallaa and aw can be captured as a difference in inquisitiveness. While this analysis accounts for the observed data in Egyptian Arabic, it also explains why the cross-linguistic data patterns as it does.},\n\tauthor = {Lauren Winans},\n\tdate-added = {2021-08-17 00:00:00 +0000},\n\tdate-modified = {2021-08-17 00:00:00 +0000},\n\tnote = {UCLA MA thesis, pre-final draft},\n\ttitle = {{Alternative Disjunctions in Egyptian Arabic}},\n\turl = {https://projects.illc.uva.nl/inquisitivesemantics/assets/files/theses/Winans2012_MAthesis-draft.pdf},\n\tyear = {2012},\n\tBdsk-Url-1 = {https://projects.illc.uva.nl/inquisitivesemantics/assets/files/theses/Winans2012_MAthesis-draft.pdf}}\n\n","author_short":["Winans, L."],"key":"Winans:12","id":"Winans:12","bibbaseid":"winans-alternativedisjunctionsinegyptianarabic-2012","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://projects.illc.uva.nl/inquisitivesemantics/assets/files/theses/Winans2012_MAthesis-draft.pdf"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"unpublished","biburl":"https://projects.illc.uva.nl/inquisitivesemantics/assets/files/papers.bib","dataSources":["x2Aox4ZP7RsyuDjWX","LaLDs2mrYhQpgH6Lk"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["alternative","disjunctions","egyptian","arabic","winans"],"title":"Alternative Disjunctions in Egyptian Arabic","year":2012}