Identifying Transdiagnostic Mechanisms in Mental Health Using Computational Factor Modeling. Wise, T., Robinson, O. J., & Gillan, C. M. Biological psychiatry, October, 2022. Place: United States
doi  abstract   bibtex   3 downloads  
Most psychiatric disorders do not occur in isolation, and most psychiatric symptom dimensions are not uniquely expressed within a single diagnostic category. Current treatments fail to work for around 25% to 40% of individuals, perhaps due at least in part to an overreliance on diagnostic categories in treatment development and allocation. In this review, we describe ongoing efforts in the field to surmount these challenges and precisely characterize psychiatric symptom dimensions using large-scale studies of unselected samples via remote, online, and "citizen science" efforts that take a dimensional, mechanistic approach. We discuss the importance that efforts to identify meaningful psychiatric dimensions be coupled with careful computational modeling to formally specify, test, and potentially falsify candidate mechanisms that underlie transdiagnostic symptom dimensions. We refer to this approach, i.e., where symptom dimensions are identified and validated against computationally well-defined neurocognitive processes, as computational factor modeling. We describe in detail some recent applications of this method to understand transdiagnostic cognitive processes that include model-based planning, metacognition, appetitive processing, and uncertainty estimation. In this context, we highlight how computational factor modeling has been used to identify specific associations between cognition and symptom dimensions and reveal previously obscured relationships, how findings generalize to smaller in-person clinical and nonclinical samples, and how the method is being adapted and optimized beyond its original instantiation. Crucially, we discuss next steps for this area of research, highlighting the value of more direct investigations of treatment response that bridge the gap between basic research and the clinic.
@article{wise_identifying_2022,
	title = {Identifying {Transdiagnostic} {Mechanisms} in {Mental} {Health} {Using} {Computational} {Factor} {Modeling}.},
	copyright = {Copyright © 2022 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.},
	issn = {1873-2402 0006-3223},
	doi = {10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.09.034},
	abstract = {Most psychiatric disorders do not occur in isolation, and most psychiatric symptom dimensions are not uniquely expressed within a single diagnostic  category. Current treatments fail to work for around 25\% to 40\% of individuals,  perhaps due at least in part to an overreliance on diagnostic categories in  treatment development and allocation. In this review, we describe ongoing efforts  in the field to surmount these challenges and precisely characterize psychiatric  symptom dimensions using large-scale studies of unselected samples via remote,  online, and "citizen science" efforts that take a dimensional, mechanistic  approach. We discuss the importance that efforts to identify meaningful  psychiatric dimensions be coupled with careful computational modeling to formally  specify, test, and potentially falsify candidate mechanisms that underlie  transdiagnostic symptom dimensions. We refer to this approach, i.e., where  symptom dimensions are identified and validated against computationally  well-defined neurocognitive processes, as computational factor modeling. We  describe in detail some recent applications of this method to understand  transdiagnostic cognitive processes that include model-based planning,  metacognition, appetitive processing, and uncertainty estimation. In this  context, we highlight how computational factor modeling has been used to identify  specific associations between cognition and symptom dimensions and reveal  previously obscured relationships, how findings generalize to smaller in-person  clinical and nonclinical samples, and how the method is being adapted and  optimized beyond its original instantiation. Crucially, we discuss next steps for  this area of research, highlighting the value of more direct investigations of  treatment response that bridge the gap between basic research and the clinic.},
	language = {eng},
	journal = {Biological psychiatry},
	author = {Wise, Toby and Robinson, Oliver J. and Gillan, Claire M.},
	month = oct,
	year = {2022},
	pmid = {36725393},
	note = {Place: United States},
	keywords = {Cognition, Computational factor modeling, Computational modeling, Factor analysis, RDoC, Transdiagnostic},
	pages = {S0006--3223(22)01661--4},
}

Downloads: 3