@inproceedings{Wolfe:00,
	title = {Effects of annotations on student readers and writers},
	abstract = {Recent research on annotations has focused on how
readers annotate texts, ignoring the question of how
reading annotations might affect subsequent readers of
a text. This paper reports on a study of persuasive
essays written by 123 undergraduates receiving primary
source materials annotated in various ways. Findings
indicate that annotations improve recall of emphasized
items, influence how specific arguments in the source
materials are perceived, decrease students' tendencies
to unnecessarily summarize. Of particular interest is
that students' perceptions of the annotator appeared to
greatly influence how they responded to the annotated
material. Using this study as a basis, I discuss
implications for the design and implementation of
digitally annotated materials.},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the fifth {ACM} conference on digital libraries},
	publisher = {ACM},
	author = {Wolfe, Joanna L},
	year = {2000},
	pages = {19--26},
}

{"_id":"QraJHANtb3pkm4MK8","bibbaseid":"wolfe-effectsofannotationsonstudentreadersandwriters-2000","author_short":["Wolfe, J. L"],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"inproceedings","type":"inproceedings","title":"Effects of annotations on student readers and writers","abstract":"Recent research on annotations has focused on how readers annotate texts, ignoring the question of how reading annotations might affect subsequent readers of a text. This paper reports on a study of persuasive essays written by 123 undergraduates receiving primary source materials annotated in various ways. Findings indicate that annotations improve recall of emphasized items, influence how specific arguments in the source materials are perceived, decrease students' tendencies to unnecessarily summarize. Of particular interest is that students' perceptions of the annotator appeared to greatly influence how they responded to the annotated material. Using this study as a basis, I discuss implications for the design and implementation of digitally annotated materials.","booktitle":"Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on digital libraries","publisher":"ACM","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Wolfe"],"firstnames":["Joanna","L"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2000","pages":"19–26","bibtex":"@inproceedings{Wolfe:00,\n\ttitle = {Effects of annotations on student readers and writers},\n\tabstract = {Recent research on annotations has focused on how\nreaders annotate texts, ignoring the question of how\nreading annotations might affect subsequent readers of\na text. This paper reports on a study of persuasive\nessays written by 123 undergraduates receiving primary\nsource materials annotated in various ways. Findings\nindicate that annotations improve recall of emphasized\nitems, influence how specific arguments in the source\nmaterials are perceived, decrease students' tendencies\nto unnecessarily summarize. Of particular interest is\nthat students' perceptions of the annotator appeared to\ngreatly influence how they responded to the annotated\nmaterial. Using this study as a basis, I discuss\nimplications for the design and implementation of\ndigitally annotated materials.},\n\tbooktitle = {Proceedings of the fifth {ACM} conference on digital libraries},\n\tpublisher = {ACM},\n\tauthor = {Wolfe, Joanna L},\n\tyear = {2000},\n\tpages = {19--26},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Wolfe, J. L"],"key":"Wolfe:00","id":"Wolfe:00","bibbaseid":"wolfe-effectsofannotationsonstudentreadersandwriters-2000","role":"author","urls":{},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"inproceedings","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/ifromm","dataSources":["N4kJAiLiJ7kxfNsoh"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["effects","annotations","student","readers","writers","wolfe"],"title":"Effects of annotations on student readers and writers","year":2000}