After the Revolution: A Review of 3D Modelling as a Tool for Stone Artefact Analysis. Wyatt-Spratt, S. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, 5(1):215–237, November, 2022. Number: 1 Publisher: Ubiquity PressPaper doi abstract bibtex With over 200 peer-reviewed papers published over the last 20 years, 3D modelling is no longer a gimmick but an established and increasingly common analytical tool for stone artefact analysis. Laser and structured light scanning, photogrammetry, and CT scanning have all been used to model stone artefacts. These have been combined with a variety of different analytical approaches, from geometric morphometrics to custom reduction indices to digital elevation maps. 3D lithic analyses are increasingly global in scope and studies aim to address an ever-broadening breadth of research topics ranging from testing the functional efficiency of artefacts to assessing the cognitive capabilities of hominid populations. While the impact of the computational revolution on lithic analysis has been reviewed, the impact of 3D modelling on lithic analysis has yet to be comprehensively assessed. This paper presents a review of how 3D modelling in particular has impacted the field of stone artefact analysis. It combines a quantitative bibliometric analysis with a qualitative review to assess just how “revolutionary” 3D modelling has been for lithic analysis. It explores trends in the use of 3D modelling in stone artefact analysis, its impact on the wider lithic analysis field, and methodological, regional and theoretical gaps which future research projects could explore
@article{wyatt-spratt_after_2022,
title = {After the {Revolution}: {A} {Review} of {3D} {Modelling} as a {Tool} for {Stone} {Artefact} {Analysis}},
volume = {5},
copyright = {Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access ). All third-party images reproduced on this journal are shared under Educational Fair Use. For more information on Educational Fair Use , please see this useful checklist prepared by Columbia University Libraries . All copyright of third-party content posted here for research purposes belongs to its original owners. Unless otherwise stated all references to characters and comic art presented on this journal are ©, ® or ™ of their respective owners. No challenge to any owner’s rights is intended or should be inferred.},
issn = {2514-8362},
shorttitle = {After the {Revolution}},
url = {http://journal.caa-international.org/article/10.5334/jcaa.103/},
doi = {10.5334/jcaa.103},
abstract = {With over 200 peer-reviewed papers published over the last 20 years, 3D modelling is no longer a gimmick but an established and increasingly common analytical tool for stone artefact analysis. Laser and structured light scanning, photogrammetry, and CT scanning have all been used to model stone artefacts. These have been combined with a variety of different analytical approaches, from geometric morphometrics to custom reduction indices to digital elevation maps. 3D lithic analyses are increasingly global in scope and studies aim to address an ever-broadening breadth of research topics ranging from testing the functional efficiency of artefacts to assessing the cognitive capabilities of hominid populations. While the impact of the computational revolution on lithic analysis has been reviewed, the impact of 3D modelling on lithic analysis has yet to be comprehensively assessed. This paper presents a review of how 3D modelling in particular has impacted the field of stone artefact analysis. It combines a quantitative bibliometric analysis with a qualitative review to assess just how “revolutionary” 3D modelling has been for lithic analysis. It explores trends in the use of 3D modelling in stone artefact analysis, its impact on the wider lithic analysis field, and methodological, regional and theoretical gaps which future research projects could explore},
language = {en},
number = {1},
urldate = {2022-11-07},
journal = {Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology},
author = {Wyatt-Spratt, Simon},
month = nov,
year = {2022},
note = {Number: 1
Publisher: Ubiquity Press},
pages = {215--237},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"PqavvKu7bi7EecE5z","bibbaseid":"wyattspratt-aftertherevolutionareviewof3dmodellingasatoolforstoneartefactanalysis-2022","author_short":["Wyatt-Spratt, S."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"After the Revolution: A Review of 3D Modelling as a Tool for Stone Artefact Analysis","volume":"5","copyright":"Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access ). All third-party images reproduced on this journal are shared under Educational Fair Use. For more information on Educational Fair Use , please see this useful checklist prepared by Columbia University Libraries . All copyright of third-party content posted here for research purposes belongs to its original owners. Unless otherwise stated all references to characters and comic art presented on this journal are ©, ® or ™ of their respective owners. No challenge to any owner’s rights is intended or should be inferred.","issn":"2514-8362","shorttitle":"After the Revolution","url":"http://journal.caa-international.org/article/10.5334/jcaa.103/","doi":"10.5334/jcaa.103","abstract":"With over 200 peer-reviewed papers published over the last 20 years, 3D modelling is no longer a gimmick but an established and increasingly common analytical tool for stone artefact analysis. Laser and structured light scanning, photogrammetry, and CT scanning have all been used to model stone artefacts. These have been combined with a variety of different analytical approaches, from geometric morphometrics to custom reduction indices to digital elevation maps. 3D lithic analyses are increasingly global in scope and studies aim to address an ever-broadening breadth of research topics ranging from testing the functional efficiency of artefacts to assessing the cognitive capabilities of hominid populations. While the impact of the computational revolution on lithic analysis has been reviewed, the impact of 3D modelling on lithic analysis has yet to be comprehensively assessed. This paper presents a review of how 3D modelling in particular has impacted the field of stone artefact analysis. It combines a quantitative bibliometric analysis with a qualitative review to assess just how “revolutionary” 3D modelling has been for lithic analysis. It explores trends in the use of 3D modelling in stone artefact analysis, its impact on the wider lithic analysis field, and methodological, regional and theoretical gaps which future research projects could explore","language":"en","number":"1","urldate":"2022-11-07","journal":"Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Wyatt-Spratt"],"firstnames":["Simon"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"November","year":"2022","note":"Number: 1 Publisher: Ubiquity Press","pages":"215–237","bibtex":"@article{wyatt-spratt_after_2022,\n\ttitle = {After the {Revolution}: {A} {Review} of {3D} {Modelling} as a {Tool} for {Stone} {Artefact} {Analysis}},\n\tvolume = {5},\n\tcopyright = {Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access ). All third-party images reproduced on this journal are shared under Educational Fair Use. For more information on Educational Fair Use , please see this useful checklist prepared by Columbia University Libraries . All copyright of third-party content posted here for research purposes belongs to its original owners. Unless otherwise stated all references to characters and comic art presented on this journal are ©, ® or ™ of their respective owners. No challenge to any owner’s rights is intended or should be inferred.},\n\tissn = {2514-8362},\n\tshorttitle = {After the {Revolution}},\n\turl = {http://journal.caa-international.org/article/10.5334/jcaa.103/},\n\tdoi = {10.5334/jcaa.103},\n\tabstract = {With over 200 peer-reviewed papers published over the last 20 years, 3D modelling is no longer a gimmick but an established and increasingly common analytical tool for stone artefact analysis. Laser and structured light scanning, photogrammetry, and CT scanning have all been used to model stone artefacts. These have been combined with a variety of different analytical approaches, from geometric morphometrics to custom reduction indices to digital elevation maps. 3D lithic analyses are increasingly global in scope and studies aim to address an ever-broadening breadth of research topics ranging from testing the functional efficiency of artefacts to assessing the cognitive capabilities of hominid populations. While the impact of the computational revolution on lithic analysis has been reviewed, the impact of 3D modelling on lithic analysis has yet to be comprehensively assessed. This paper presents a review of how 3D modelling in particular has impacted the field of stone artefact analysis. It combines a quantitative bibliometric analysis with a qualitative review to assess just how “revolutionary” 3D modelling has been for lithic analysis. It explores trends in the use of 3D modelling in stone artefact analysis, its impact on the wider lithic analysis field, and methodological, regional and theoretical gaps which future research projects could explore},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2022-11-07},\n\tjournal = {Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology},\n\tauthor = {Wyatt-Spratt, Simon},\n\tmonth = nov,\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tnote = {Number: 1\nPublisher: Ubiquity Press},\n\tpages = {215--237},\n}\n","author_short":["Wyatt-Spratt, S."],"key":"wyatt-spratt_after_2022","id":"wyatt-spratt_after_2022","bibbaseid":"wyattspratt-aftertherevolutionareviewof3dmodellingasatoolforstoneartefactanalysis-2022","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://journal.caa-international.org/article/10.5334/jcaa.103/"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0,"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/groups/5507062/items?key=g6SEhIz0ey4lsiY99O3xP252&format=bibtex&limit=100","dataSources":["xEzikbHySF5Ytg6qR"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["revolution","review","modelling","tool","stone","artefact","analysis","wyatt-spratt"],"title":"After the Revolution: A Review of 3D Modelling as a Tool for Stone Artefact Analysis","year":2022}