motivation, engagement, and retention in a MOOC: A structural equation modeling approach. Global Education Review, 2 (3). 23-33 Examining the Relations among Student Motivation, Engagement, and Retention in a MOOC: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Xiong, Y., Li, H., Kornhaber, M., L., Suen, H., K., Pursel, B., & Goins, D., D. Technical Report abstract bibtex Students who are enrolled in MOOCs tend to have different motivational patterns than fee-paying college students. A majority of MOOC students demonstrate characteristics akin more to "tourists" than formal learners. As a consequence, MOOC students' completion rate is usually very low. The current study examines the relations among student motivation, engagement, and retention using structural equation modeling and data from a Penn State University MOOC. Three distinct types of motivation are examined: intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and social motivation. Two main hypotheses are tested: (a) motivation predicts student course engagement; and (b) student engagement predicts their retention in
@techreport{
title = {motivation, engagement, and retention in a MOOC: A structural equation modeling approach. Global Education Review, 2 (3). 23-33 Examining the Relations among Student Motivation, Engagement, and Retention in a MOOC: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach},
type = {techreport},
id = {25d9151a-e5ca-314a-8bdf-598e76d29cf6},
created = {2020-02-03T14:15:25.895Z},
accessed = {2020-02-03},
file_attached = {false},
profile_id = {bfdabac2-d7f2-3c5b-aa7a-06431c0ae35e},
group_id = {ed1fa25d-c56b-3067-962d-9d08ff49394c},
last_modified = {2020-02-03T14:15:26.305Z},
read = {false},
starred = {false},
authored = {false},
confirmed = {false},
hidden = {false},
folder_uuids = {af1b8628-85f8-4733-9f52-121159400517},
private_publication = {false},
abstract = {Students who are enrolled in MOOCs tend to have different motivational patterns than fee-paying college students. A majority of MOOC students demonstrate characteristics akin more to "tourists" than formal learners. As a consequence, MOOC students' completion rate is usually very low. The current study examines the relations among student motivation, engagement, and retention using structural equation modeling and data from a Penn State University MOOC. Three distinct types of motivation are examined: intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and social motivation. Two main hypotheses are tested: (a) motivation predicts student course engagement; and (b) student engagement predicts their retention in},
bibtype = {techreport},
author = {Xiong, Yao and Li, Hongli and Kornhaber, Mindy L and Suen, Hoi K and Pursel, Barton and Goins, Deborah D}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"DT2z2NzSuTzuDHf3u","bibbaseid":"xiong-li-kornhaber-suen-pursel-goins-motivationengagementandretentioninamoocastructuralequationmodelingapproachglobaleducationreview232333examiningtherelationsamongstudentmotivationengagementandretentioninamoocastructuralequationmodelingapproach","authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Xiong, Y.","Li, H.","Kornhaber, M., L.","Suen, H., K.","Pursel, B.","Goins, D., D."],"bibdata":{"title":"motivation, engagement, and retention in a MOOC: A structural equation modeling approach. Global Education Review, 2 (3). 23-33 Examining the Relations among Student Motivation, Engagement, and Retention in a MOOC: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach","type":"techreport","id":"25d9151a-e5ca-314a-8bdf-598e76d29cf6","created":"2020-02-03T14:15:25.895Z","accessed":"2020-02-03","file_attached":false,"profile_id":"bfdabac2-d7f2-3c5b-aa7a-06431c0ae35e","group_id":"ed1fa25d-c56b-3067-962d-9d08ff49394c","last_modified":"2020-02-03T14:15:26.305Z","read":false,"starred":false,"authored":false,"confirmed":false,"hidden":false,"folder_uuids":"af1b8628-85f8-4733-9f52-121159400517","private_publication":false,"abstract":"Students who are enrolled in MOOCs tend to have different motivational patterns than fee-paying college students. A majority of MOOC students demonstrate characteristics akin more to \"tourists\" than formal learners. As a consequence, MOOC students' completion rate is usually very low. The current study examines the relations among student motivation, engagement, and retention using structural equation modeling and data from a Penn State University MOOC. Three distinct types of motivation are examined: intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and social motivation. Two main hypotheses are tested: (a) motivation predicts student course engagement; and (b) student engagement predicts their retention in","bibtype":"techreport","author":"Xiong, Yao and Li, Hongli and Kornhaber, Mindy L and Suen, Hoi K and Pursel, Barton and Goins, Deborah D","bibtex":"@techreport{\n title = {motivation, engagement, and retention in a MOOC: A structural equation modeling approach. Global Education Review, 2 (3). 23-33 Examining the Relations among Student Motivation, Engagement, and Retention in a MOOC: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach},\n type = {techreport},\n id = {25d9151a-e5ca-314a-8bdf-598e76d29cf6},\n created = {2020-02-03T14:15:25.895Z},\n accessed = {2020-02-03},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {bfdabac2-d7f2-3c5b-aa7a-06431c0ae35e},\n group_id = {ed1fa25d-c56b-3067-962d-9d08ff49394c},\n last_modified = {2020-02-03T14:15:26.305Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {false},\n hidden = {false},\n folder_uuids = {af1b8628-85f8-4733-9f52-121159400517},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Students who are enrolled in MOOCs tend to have different motivational patterns than fee-paying college students. A majority of MOOC students demonstrate characteristics akin more to \"tourists\" than formal learners. As a consequence, MOOC students' completion rate is usually very low. The current study examines the relations among student motivation, engagement, and retention using structural equation modeling and data from a Penn State University MOOC. Three distinct types of motivation are examined: intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and social motivation. Two main hypotheses are tested: (a) motivation predicts student course engagement; and (b) student engagement predicts their retention in},\n bibtype = {techreport},\n author = {Xiong, Yao and Li, Hongli and Kornhaber, Mindy L and Suen, Hoi K and Pursel, Barton and Goins, Deborah D}\n}","author_short":["Xiong, Y.","Li, H.","Kornhaber, M., L.","Suen, H., K.","Pursel, B.","Goins, D., D."],"bibbaseid":"xiong-li-kornhaber-suen-pursel-goins-motivationengagementandretentioninamoocastructuralequationmodelingapproachglobaleducationreview232333examiningtherelationsamongstudentmotivationengagementandretentioninamoocastructuralequationmodelingapproach","role":"author","urls":{},"downloads":0,"html":""},"bibtype":"techreport","creationDate":"2020-02-06T23:40:06.993Z","downloads":0,"keywords":[],"search_terms":["motivation","engagement","retention","mooc","structural","equation","modeling","approach","global","education","review","examining","relations","student","motivation","engagement","retention","mooc","structural","equation","modeling","approach","xiong","li","kornhaber","suen","pursel","goins"],"title":"motivation, engagement, and retention in a MOOC: A structural equation modeling approach. Global Education Review, 2 (3). 23-33 Examining the Relations among Student Motivation, Engagement, and Retention in a MOOC: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach","year":null}