Single-trial EEG power and phase dynamics associated with voluntary response inhibition. Yamanaka, K. & Yamamoto, Y. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 22(4):714–27, April, 2010.
Paper doi abstract bibtex Human voluntary response inhibition has frequently been investigated using go/no-go RT tasks. Recent studies have indicated that not only the traditional averaging waveforms of EEG activities (ERPs) but also the power and phase dynamics of single-trial EEG are important in studying the neural correlates of various human cognitive functions. Therefore, here, we aimed to undertake a detailed study of the time/frequency power and phase dynamics of single-trial EEG during go/no-go RT tasks, with focus particularly on the no-go-specific power and phase dynamics, which are presumed to involve the voluntary response inhibition processes. Thus, we demonstrated no-go-specific theta band EEG power increases and intertrial phase-locking in the midline-frontal areas, which are related to no-go-specific midline-frontal negative-positive ERP waveforms (no-go N2/no-go P3). In addition, we observed no-go-specific alpha band EEG intertrial phase-locking with an adjacent dephasing phenomenon, which is mainly associated with the early part of no-go N2. The estimated time point when the no-go-specific midline-frontal dephasing phenomenon occurred corresponded to the initial part of the voluntary response inhibition process (decision to withhold). Moreover, the no-go-specific phase dynamics in the midline-frontal areas just before and around the no-go N2 peak latency, unlike the power modulations, were affected by changes in the no-go stimulus probability, suggesting the dependence of only phase dynamics on no-go stimulus probability. From these results, we conclude that the complex power and phase dynamics of the theta and alpha band EEG in the midline-frontal areas are specific to no-go trials, being the underlying bases of the no-go-specific ERP waveforms, and suggest that the phase dynamics just before and around the no-go N2 peak latency may involve, at least, the initial part of the voluntary response inhibition process (decision to withhold).
@article{yamanaka_single-trial_2010,
title = {Single-trial {EEG} power and phase dynamics associated with voluntary response inhibition.},
volume = {22},
issn = {1530-8898},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19413474},
doi = {10.1162/jocn.2009.21258},
abstract = {Human voluntary response inhibition has frequently been investigated using go/no-go RT tasks. Recent studies have indicated that not only the traditional averaging waveforms of EEG activities (ERPs) but also the power and phase dynamics of single-trial EEG are important in studying the neural correlates of various human cognitive functions. Therefore, here, we aimed to undertake a detailed study of the time/frequency power and phase dynamics of single-trial EEG during go/no-go RT tasks, with focus particularly on the no-go-specific power and phase dynamics, which are presumed to involve the voluntary response inhibition processes. Thus, we demonstrated no-go-specific theta band EEG power increases and intertrial phase-locking in the midline-frontal areas, which are related to no-go-specific midline-frontal negative-positive ERP waveforms (no-go N2/no-go P3). In addition, we observed no-go-specific alpha band EEG intertrial phase-locking with an adjacent dephasing phenomenon, which is mainly associated with the early part of no-go N2. The estimated time point when the no-go-specific midline-frontal dephasing phenomenon occurred corresponded to the initial part of the voluntary response inhibition process (decision to withhold). Moreover, the no-go-specific phase dynamics in the midline-frontal areas just before and around the no-go N2 peak latency, unlike the power modulations, were affected by changes in the no-go stimulus probability, suggesting the dependence of only phase dynamics on no-go stimulus probability. From these results, we conclude that the complex power and phase dynamics of the theta and alpha band EEG in the midline-frontal areas are specific to no-go trials, being the underlying bases of the no-go-specific ERP waveforms, and suggest that the phase dynamics just before and around the no-go N2 peak latency may involve, at least, the initial part of the voluntary response inhibition process (decision to withhold).},
number = {4},
urldate = {2015-05-07},
journal = {Journal of cognitive neuroscience},
author = {Yamanaka, Kentaro and Yamamoto, Yoshiharu},
month = apr,
year = {2010},
pmid = {19413474},
keywords = {Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain, Brain Mapping, Brain: physiology, Choice Behavior, Choice Behavior: physiology, Electroencephalography, Electroencephalography: methods, Humans, Inhibition (Psychology), Male, Models, Neurological, Neuropsychological Tests, Nonlinear Dynamics, Photic Stimulation, Photic Stimulation: methods, Reaction Time, Reaction Time: physiology, Spectrum Analysis, Spectrum Analysis: methods},
pages = {714--27},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"irnCvJaeB8mGhN2Kv","bibbaseid":"yamanaka-yamamoto-singletrialeegpowerandphasedynamicsassociatedwithvoluntaryresponseinhibition-2010","author_short":["Yamanaka, K.","Yamamoto, Y."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Single-trial EEG power and phase dynamics associated with voluntary response inhibition.","volume":"22","issn":"1530-8898","url":"http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19413474","doi":"10.1162/jocn.2009.21258","abstract":"Human voluntary response inhibition has frequently been investigated using go/no-go RT tasks. Recent studies have indicated that not only the traditional averaging waveforms of EEG activities (ERPs) but also the power and phase dynamics of single-trial EEG are important in studying the neural correlates of various human cognitive functions. Therefore, here, we aimed to undertake a detailed study of the time/frequency power and phase dynamics of single-trial EEG during go/no-go RT tasks, with focus particularly on the no-go-specific power and phase dynamics, which are presumed to involve the voluntary response inhibition processes. Thus, we demonstrated no-go-specific theta band EEG power increases and intertrial phase-locking in the midline-frontal areas, which are related to no-go-specific midline-frontal negative-positive ERP waveforms (no-go N2/no-go P3). In addition, we observed no-go-specific alpha band EEG intertrial phase-locking with an adjacent dephasing phenomenon, which is mainly associated with the early part of no-go N2. The estimated time point when the no-go-specific midline-frontal dephasing phenomenon occurred corresponded to the initial part of the voluntary response inhibition process (decision to withhold). Moreover, the no-go-specific phase dynamics in the midline-frontal areas just before and around the no-go N2 peak latency, unlike the power modulations, were affected by changes in the no-go stimulus probability, suggesting the dependence of only phase dynamics on no-go stimulus probability. From these results, we conclude that the complex power and phase dynamics of the theta and alpha band EEG in the midline-frontal areas are specific to no-go trials, being the underlying bases of the no-go-specific ERP waveforms, and suggest that the phase dynamics just before and around the no-go N2 peak latency may involve, at least, the initial part of the voluntary response inhibition process (decision to withhold).","number":"4","urldate":"2015-05-07","journal":"Journal of cognitive neuroscience","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Yamanaka"],"firstnames":["Kentaro"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Yamamoto"],"firstnames":["Yoshiharu"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"April","year":"2010","pmid":"19413474","keywords":"Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain, Brain Mapping, Brain: physiology, Choice Behavior, Choice Behavior: physiology, Electroencephalography, Electroencephalography: methods, Humans, Inhibition (Psychology), Male, Models, Neurological, Neuropsychological Tests, Nonlinear Dynamics, Photic Stimulation, Photic Stimulation: methods, Reaction Time, Reaction Time: physiology, Spectrum Analysis, Spectrum Analysis: methods","pages":"714–27","bibtex":"@article{yamanaka_single-trial_2010,\n\ttitle = {Single-trial {EEG} power and phase dynamics associated with voluntary response inhibition.},\n\tvolume = {22},\n\tissn = {1530-8898},\n\turl = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19413474},\n\tdoi = {10.1162/jocn.2009.21258},\n\tabstract = {Human voluntary response inhibition has frequently been investigated using go/no-go RT tasks. Recent studies have indicated that not only the traditional averaging waveforms of EEG activities (ERPs) but also the power and phase dynamics of single-trial EEG are important in studying the neural correlates of various human cognitive functions. Therefore, here, we aimed to undertake a detailed study of the time/frequency power and phase dynamics of single-trial EEG during go/no-go RT tasks, with focus particularly on the no-go-specific power and phase dynamics, which are presumed to involve the voluntary response inhibition processes. Thus, we demonstrated no-go-specific theta band EEG power increases and intertrial phase-locking in the midline-frontal areas, which are related to no-go-specific midline-frontal negative-positive ERP waveforms (no-go N2/no-go P3). In addition, we observed no-go-specific alpha band EEG intertrial phase-locking with an adjacent dephasing phenomenon, which is mainly associated with the early part of no-go N2. The estimated time point when the no-go-specific midline-frontal dephasing phenomenon occurred corresponded to the initial part of the voluntary response inhibition process (decision to withhold). Moreover, the no-go-specific phase dynamics in the midline-frontal areas just before and around the no-go N2 peak latency, unlike the power modulations, were affected by changes in the no-go stimulus probability, suggesting the dependence of only phase dynamics on no-go stimulus probability. From these results, we conclude that the complex power and phase dynamics of the theta and alpha band EEG in the midline-frontal areas are specific to no-go trials, being the underlying bases of the no-go-specific ERP waveforms, and suggest that the phase dynamics just before and around the no-go N2 peak latency may involve, at least, the initial part of the voluntary response inhibition process (decision to withhold).},\n\tnumber = {4},\n\turldate = {2015-05-07},\n\tjournal = {Journal of cognitive neuroscience},\n\tauthor = {Yamanaka, Kentaro and Yamamoto, Yoshiharu},\n\tmonth = apr,\n\tyear = {2010},\n\tpmid = {19413474},\n\tkeywords = {Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain, Brain Mapping, Brain: physiology, Choice Behavior, Choice Behavior: physiology, Electroencephalography, Electroencephalography: methods, Humans, Inhibition (Psychology), Male, Models, Neurological, Neuropsychological Tests, Nonlinear Dynamics, Photic Stimulation, Photic Stimulation: methods, Reaction Time, Reaction Time: physiology, Spectrum Analysis, Spectrum Analysis: methods},\n\tpages = {714--27},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Yamanaka, K.","Yamamoto, Y."],"key":"yamanaka_single-trial_2010","id":"yamanaka_single-trial_2010","bibbaseid":"yamanaka-yamamoto-singletrialeegpowerandphasedynamicsassociatedwithvoluntaryresponseinhibition-2010","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19413474"},"keyword":["Adult","Analysis of Variance","Brain","Brain Mapping","Brain: physiology","Choice Behavior","Choice Behavior: physiology","Electroencephalography","Electroencephalography: methods","Humans","Inhibition (Psychology)","Male","Models","Neurological","Neuropsychological Tests","Nonlinear Dynamics","Photic Stimulation","Photic Stimulation: methods","Reaction Time","Reaction Time: physiology","Spectrum Analysis","Spectrum Analysis: methods"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/asrommel","dataSources":["J8fbWsdsy3xAaB3pX"],"keywords":["adult","analysis of variance","brain","brain mapping","brain: physiology","choice behavior","choice behavior: physiology","electroencephalography","electroencephalography: methods","humans","inhibition (psychology)","male","models","neurological","neuropsychological tests","nonlinear dynamics","photic stimulation","photic stimulation: methods","reaction time","reaction time: physiology","spectrum analysis","spectrum analysis: methods"],"search_terms":["single","trial","eeg","power","phase","dynamics","associated","voluntary","response","inhibition","yamanaka","yamamoto"],"title":"Single-trial EEG power and phase dynamics associated with voluntary response inhibition.","year":2010}