Why is rose bengal more phototoxic to fibroblasts in vitro than in vivo?. Yao, M., Gu, C., Doyle, F. J., Zhu, H., Redmond, R. W., & Kochevar, I. E. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 90(2):297--305, April, 2014. 00005 doi abstract bibtex Photosensitized protein cross-linking has been recently developed to seal wounds and strengthen tissue. Although the photosensitizing dye, Rose Bengal (RB), is phototoxic to cultured cells, cytotoxicity does not accompany RB-photosensitized tissue repair in vivo. We investigated whether the environment surrounding cells in tissue or the high irradiances used for photo-cross-linking inhibited RB phototoxicity. Fibroblasts (FB) grown within collagen gels to mimic a tissue environment and monolayer cultured FB were treated with RB (0.01-1 mm) and the high 532 nm laser irradiances used in vivo for tissue repair (0.10-0.50 W cm(-2)). Monolayer FB were substantially more sensitive to RB photosensitization: the LD50 was \textgreater200-fold lower than that in collagen gels. Collagen gel protection was associated with increased Akt phosphorylation, a prosurvival pathway. RB phototoxicity in collagen gels was 25-fold greater at low (0.030 W cm(-2)) that at high (0.50 W cm(-2)) irradiances. Oxygen depletion at high irradiance only partially accounted for the irradiance dependence of phototoxicity as replacing air with nitrogen only increased the LD50 by four-fold in monolayers. These results indicate that the lack of RB phototoxicity during in vivo tissue repair results from upregulation of prosurvival pathways in tissue cells, oxygen depletion and irradiance-dependent RB photochemistry.
@article{yao_why_2014,
title = {Why is rose bengal more phototoxic to fibroblasts in vitro than in vivo?},
volume = {90},
issn = {1751-1097},
doi = {10.1111/php.12215},
abstract = {Photosensitized protein cross-linking has been recently developed to seal wounds and strengthen tissue. Although the photosensitizing dye, Rose Bengal (RB), is phototoxic to cultured cells, cytotoxicity does not accompany RB-photosensitized tissue repair in vivo. We investigated whether the environment surrounding cells in tissue or the high irradiances used for photo-cross-linking inhibited RB phototoxicity. Fibroblasts (FB) grown within collagen gels to mimic a tissue environment and monolayer cultured FB were treated with RB (0.01-1 mm) and the high 532 nm laser irradiances used in vivo for tissue repair (0.10-0.50 W cm(-2)). Monolayer FB were substantially more sensitive to RB photosensitization: the LD50 was {\textgreater}200-fold lower than that in collagen gels. Collagen gel protection was associated with increased Akt phosphorylation, a prosurvival pathway. RB phototoxicity in collagen gels was 25-fold greater at low (0.030 W cm(-2)) that at high (0.50 W cm(-2)) irradiances. Oxygen depletion at high irradiance only partially accounted for the irradiance dependence of phototoxicity as replacing air with nitrogen only increased the LD50 by four-fold in monolayers. These results indicate that the lack of RB phototoxicity during in vivo tissue repair results from upregulation of prosurvival pathways in tissue cells, oxygen depletion and irradiance-dependent RB photochemistry.},
language = {eng},
number = {2},
journal = {Photochemistry and Photobiology},
author = {Yao, Min and Gu, Chuan and Doyle, Francis J. and Zhu, Hong and Redmond, Robert W. and Kochevar, Irene E.},
month = apr,
year = {2014},
pmid = {24266530},
note = {00005 },
keywords = {Cells, Cultured, Collagen, Fibroblasts, Humans, In Vitro Techniques, Light, Rose Bengal},
pages = {297--305}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"MsqXi8PCcDaLFtGoZ","bibbaseid":"yao-gu-doyle-zhu-redmond-kochevar-whyisrosebengalmorephototoxictofibroblastsinvitrothaninvivo-2014","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2016-12-16T08:43:40.769Z","title":"Why is rose bengal more phototoxic to fibroblasts in vitro than in vivo?","author_short":["Yao, M.","Gu, C.","Doyle, F. J.","Zhu, H.","Redmond, R. W.","Kochevar, I. E."],"year":2014,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero/caplille","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Why is rose bengal more phototoxic to fibroblasts in vitro than in vivo?","volume":"90","issn":"1751-1097","doi":"10.1111/php.12215","abstract":"Photosensitized protein cross-linking has been recently developed to seal wounds and strengthen tissue. Although the photosensitizing dye, Rose Bengal (RB), is phototoxic to cultured cells, cytotoxicity does not accompany RB-photosensitized tissue repair in vivo. We investigated whether the environment surrounding cells in tissue or the high irradiances used for photo-cross-linking inhibited RB phototoxicity. Fibroblasts (FB) grown within collagen gels to mimic a tissue environment and monolayer cultured FB were treated with RB (0.01-1 mm) and the high 532 nm laser irradiances used in vivo for tissue repair (0.10-0.50 W cm(-2)). Monolayer FB were substantially more sensitive to RB photosensitization: the LD50 was \\textgreater200-fold lower than that in collagen gels. Collagen gel protection was associated with increased Akt phosphorylation, a prosurvival pathway. RB phototoxicity in collagen gels was 25-fold greater at low (0.030 W cm(-2)) that at high (0.50 W cm(-2)) irradiances. Oxygen depletion at high irradiance only partially accounted for the irradiance dependence of phototoxicity as replacing air with nitrogen only increased the LD50 by four-fold in monolayers. These results indicate that the lack of RB phototoxicity during in vivo tissue repair results from upregulation of prosurvival pathways in tissue cells, oxygen depletion and irradiance-dependent RB photochemistry.","language":"eng","number":"2","journal":"Photochemistry and Photobiology","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Yao"],"firstnames":["Min"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Gu"],"firstnames":["Chuan"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Doyle"],"firstnames":["Francis","J."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Zhu"],"firstnames":["Hong"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Redmond"],"firstnames":["Robert","W."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Kochevar"],"firstnames":["Irene","E."],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"April","year":"2014","pmid":"24266530","note":"00005 ","keywords":"Cells, Cultured, Collagen, Fibroblasts, Humans, In Vitro Techniques, Light, Rose Bengal","pages":"297--305","bibtex":"@article{yao_why_2014,\n\ttitle = {Why is rose bengal more phototoxic to fibroblasts in vitro than in vivo?},\n\tvolume = {90},\n\tissn = {1751-1097},\n\tdoi = {10.1111/php.12215},\n\tabstract = {Photosensitized protein cross-linking has been recently developed to seal wounds and strengthen tissue. Although the photosensitizing dye, Rose Bengal (RB), is phototoxic to cultured cells, cytotoxicity does not accompany RB-photosensitized tissue repair in vivo. We investigated whether the environment surrounding cells in tissue or the high irradiances used for photo-cross-linking inhibited RB phototoxicity. Fibroblasts (FB) grown within collagen gels to mimic a tissue environment and monolayer cultured FB were treated with RB (0.01-1 mm) and the high 532 nm laser irradiances used in vivo for tissue repair (0.10-0.50 W cm(-2)). Monolayer FB were substantially more sensitive to RB photosensitization: the LD50 was {\\textgreater}200-fold lower than that in collagen gels. Collagen gel protection was associated with increased Akt phosphorylation, a prosurvival pathway. RB phototoxicity in collagen gels was 25-fold greater at low (0.030 W cm(-2)) that at high (0.50 W cm(-2)) irradiances. Oxygen depletion at high irradiance only partially accounted for the irradiance dependence of phototoxicity as replacing air with nitrogen only increased the LD50 by four-fold in monolayers. These results indicate that the lack of RB phototoxicity during in vivo tissue repair results from upregulation of prosurvival pathways in tissue cells, oxygen depletion and irradiance-dependent RB photochemistry.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\tjournal = {Photochemistry and Photobiology},\n\tauthor = {Yao, Min and Gu, Chuan and Doyle, Francis J. and Zhu, Hong and Redmond, Robert W. and Kochevar, Irene E.},\n\tmonth = apr,\n\tyear = {2014},\n\tpmid = {24266530},\n\tnote = {00005 },\n\tkeywords = {Cells, Cultured, Collagen, Fibroblasts, Humans, In Vitro Techniques, Light, Rose Bengal},\n\tpages = {297--305}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Yao, M.","Gu, C.","Doyle, F. J.","Zhu, H.","Redmond, R. W.","Kochevar, I. E."],"key":"yao_why_2014","id":"yao_why_2014","bibbaseid":"yao-gu-doyle-zhu-redmond-kochevar-whyisrosebengalmorephototoxictofibroblastsinvitrothaninvivo-2014","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["Cells","Cultured","Collagen","Fibroblasts","Humans","In Vitro Techniques","Light","Rose Bengal"],"downloads":0,"html":""},"search_terms":["rose","bengal","more","phototoxic","fibroblasts","vitro","vivo","yao","gu","doyle","zhu","redmond","kochevar"],"keywords":["cells","cultured","collagen","fibroblasts","humans","in vitro techniques","light","rose bengal"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["pPXo2k5Qsf43yyWNB"]}