A deliberation theory-based approach to the management of usability guidelines. Yetim, F. Informing Science, 12:73–104, 2009. abstract bibtex Designing interaction entails addressing multiple issues and challenges, ranging from the techni- cal and economic to the legal and ethical. Usability guidelines recommend or prescribe courses of action and thus play a significant role in designing usable systems. This paper argues that ap- proaches to guidelines need to support processes of deliberation and tradeoff and suggests a de- liberation theory-informed model for the organization of guidelines. The model integrates con- cepts from Habermas' discourse theory and Toulmin's model of argumentation to categorize and represent guidelines. In addition, the paper presents two explorative studies conducted to under- stand the representational fit of the suggested categories to the domain of guidelines. The studies specifically consider the characteristics of coverage and encodability and also explore difficult cases. Finally, a brief summary of the usability evaluation results of the prototype that instantiated the proposed model is provided. This paper contributes to research and praxis by providing a the- ory-based model and a prototype for the management of guidelines.
@article{yetim_deliberation_2009,
title = {A deliberation theory-based approach to the management of usability guidelines},
volume = {12},
issn = {15214672},
abstract = {Designing interaction entails addressing multiple issues and challenges, ranging from the techni- cal and economic to the legal and ethical. Usability guidelines recommend or prescribe courses of action and thus play a significant role in designing usable systems. This paper argues that ap- proaches to guidelines need to support processes of deliberation and tradeoff and suggests a de- liberation theory-informed model for the organization of guidelines. The model integrates con- cepts from Habermas' discourse theory and Toulmin's model of argumentation to categorize and represent guidelines. In addition, the paper presents two explorative studies conducted to under- stand the representational fit of the suggested categories to the domain of guidelines. The studies specifically consider the characteristics of coverage and encodability and also explore difficult cases. Finally, a brief summary of the usability evaluation results of the prototype that instantiated the proposed model is provided. This paper contributes to research and praxis by providing a the- ory-based model and a prototype for the management of guidelines.},
journal = {Informing Science},
author = {Yetim, Fahri},
year = {2009},
keywords = {Deliberation, Discourse theory, Human factors in information systems, Human-computer interaction, Reflective design, Tool, Usability categories, Usability guidelines},
pages = {73--104},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"n7JD7rG2FaQEwJofZ","bibbaseid":"yetim-adeliberationtheorybasedapproachtothemanagementofusabilityguidelines-2009","author_short":["Yetim, F."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"A deliberation theory-based approach to the management of usability guidelines","volume":"12","issn":"15214672","abstract":"Designing interaction entails addressing multiple issues and challenges, ranging from the techni- cal and economic to the legal and ethical. Usability guidelines recommend or prescribe courses of action and thus play a significant role in designing usable systems. This paper argues that ap- proaches to guidelines need to support processes of deliberation and tradeoff and suggests a de- liberation theory-informed model for the organization of guidelines. The model integrates con- cepts from Habermas' discourse theory and Toulmin's model of argumentation to categorize and represent guidelines. In addition, the paper presents two explorative studies conducted to under- stand the representational fit of the suggested categories to the domain of guidelines. The studies specifically consider the characteristics of coverage and encodability and also explore difficult cases. Finally, a brief summary of the usability evaluation results of the prototype that instantiated the proposed model is provided. This paper contributes to research and praxis by providing a the- ory-based model and a prototype for the management of guidelines.","journal":"Informing Science","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Yetim"],"firstnames":["Fahri"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2009","keywords":"Deliberation, Discourse theory, Human factors in information systems, Human-computer interaction, Reflective design, Tool, Usability categories, Usability guidelines","pages":"73–104","bibtex":"@article{yetim_deliberation_2009,\n\ttitle = {A deliberation theory-based approach to the management of usability guidelines},\n\tvolume = {12},\n\tissn = {15214672},\n\tabstract = {Designing interaction entails addressing multiple issues and challenges, ranging from the techni- cal and economic to the legal and ethical. Usability guidelines recommend or prescribe courses of action and thus play a significant role in designing usable systems. This paper argues that ap- proaches to guidelines need to support processes of deliberation and tradeoff and suggests a de- liberation theory-informed model for the organization of guidelines. The model integrates con- cepts from Habermas' discourse theory and Toulmin's model of argumentation to categorize and represent guidelines. In addition, the paper presents two explorative studies conducted to under- stand the representational fit of the suggested categories to the domain of guidelines. The studies specifically consider the characteristics of coverage and encodability and also explore difficult cases. Finally, a brief summary of the usability evaluation results of the prototype that instantiated the proposed model is provided. This paper contributes to research and praxis by providing a the- ory-based model and a prototype for the management of guidelines.},\n\tjournal = {Informing Science},\n\tauthor = {Yetim, Fahri},\n\tyear = {2009},\n\tkeywords = {Deliberation, Discourse theory, Human factors in information systems, Human-computer interaction, Reflective design, Tool, Usability categories, Usability guidelines},\n\tpages = {73--104},\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Yetim, F."],"key":"yetim_deliberation_2009","id":"yetim_deliberation_2009","bibbaseid":"yetim-adeliberationtheorybasedapproachtothemanagementofusabilityguidelines-2009","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["Deliberation","Discourse theory","Human factors in information systems","Human-computer interaction","Reflective design","Tool","Usability categories","Usability guidelines"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero-group/WinemeCSCW/2912317","dataSources":["Kxq3gH5SwaGv2DquW","suQH2QbCKNvwnAPoB","2aZf3F3Kjs6p26m56","hSFGrExiTp7kYXqj4"],"keywords":["deliberation","discourse theory","human factors in information systems","human-computer interaction","reflective design","tool","usability categories","usability guidelines"],"search_terms":["deliberation","theory","based","approach","management","usability","guidelines","yetim"],"title":"A deliberation theory-based approach to the management of usability guidelines","year":2009}