Comparison of equilibrium and transient responses to CO2 increase in eight state-of-the-art climate models. Yokohata, T., Emori, S., Nozawa, T., Ogura, T., Kawamiya, M., Tsushima, Y., Suzuki, T., Yukimoto, S., Abe-Ouchi, A., Hasumi, H., Sumi, A., & Kimoto, M. Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, 60(5):946–961, January, 2008. ![Comparison of equilibrium and transient responses to CO2 increase in eight state-of-the-art climate models [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex We compared the climate response of doubled CO2 equilibrium experiments (2 × CO2) by atmosphere–slab ocean coupled general circulation models (ASGCMs) and that of 1% per year CO2 increase experiments (1%CO2 by atmosphere–ocean coupled general circulation models (AOGCMs) using eight state-of-the-art climate models. Climate feedback processes in 2 × CO2 are different from those in 1%CO2, and the equilibrium climate sensitivity (T2×) in 2 × CO2 is different from the effective climate sensitivity (T2×,eff) in 1%CO2. The difference between T2× and T2×,eff is from −1.3 to 1.6 K, a large part of which can be explained by the difference in the ice-albedo and cloud feedback. The largest contribution is cloud SW feedback, and the difference in cloud SW feedback for 2 × CO2 and 1%CO2 could be determined by the distribution of the SAT anomaly which causes differences in the atmospheric thermal structure. An important factor which determines the difference in ice-albedo feedback is the initial sea ice distribution at the Southern Ocean, which is generally overestimated in 2 × CO2 as compared to 1%CO2 and observation. Through the comparison of climate feedback processes in 2 × CO2 and 1%CO2, the possible behaviour of the time evolution of T2×,eff is discussed.
@article{yokohata_comparison_2008,
title = {Comparison of equilibrium and transient responses to {CO2} increase in eight state-of-the-art climate models},
volume = {60},
issn = {1600-0870},
url = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2008.00345.x},
doi = {10.1111/j.1600-0870.2008.00345.x},
abstract = {We compared the climate response of doubled CO2 equilibrium experiments (2 × CO2) by atmosphere–slab ocean coupled general circulation models (ASGCMs) and that of 1\% per year CO2 increase experiments (1\%CO2 by atmosphere–ocean coupled general circulation models (AOGCMs) using eight state-of-the-art climate models. Climate feedback processes in 2 × CO2 are different from those in 1\%CO2, and the equilibrium climate sensitivity (T2×) in 2 × CO2 is different from the effective climate sensitivity (T2×,eff) in 1\%CO2. The difference between T2× and T2×,eff is from −1.3 to 1.6 K, a large part of which can be explained by the difference in the ice-albedo and cloud feedback. The largest contribution is cloud SW feedback, and the difference in cloud SW feedback for 2 × CO2 and 1\%CO2 could be determined by the distribution of the SAT anomaly which causes differences in the atmospheric thermal structure. An important factor which determines the difference in ice-albedo feedback is the initial sea ice distribution at the Southern Ocean, which is generally overestimated in 2 × CO2 as compared to 1\%CO2 and observation. Through the comparison of climate feedback processes in 2 × CO2 and 1\%CO2, the possible behaviour of the time evolution of T2×,eff is discussed.},
language = {en},
number = {5},
urldate = {2017-06-10},
journal = {Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography},
author = {Yokohata, Tokuta and Emori, Seita and Nozawa, Toru and Ogura, Tomoo and Kawamiya, Michio and Tsushima, Yoko and Suzuki, Tatsuo and Yukimoto, Seiji and Abe-Ouchi, Ayako and Hasumi, Hiroyasu and Sumi, Akimasa and Kimoto, Masahide},
month = jan,
year = {2008},
keywords = {GA, Untagged},
pages = {946--961},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"wJB4D65ErpW4Y3Z9k","bibbaseid":"yokohata-emori-nozawa-ogura-kawamiya-tsushima-suzuki-yukimoto-etal-comparisonofequilibriumandtransientresponsestoco2increaseineightstateoftheartclimatemodels-2008","author_short":["Yokohata, T.","Emori, S.","Nozawa, T.","Ogura, T.","Kawamiya, M.","Tsushima, Y.","Suzuki, T.","Yukimoto, S.","Abe-Ouchi, A.","Hasumi, H.","Sumi, A.","Kimoto, M."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Comparison of equilibrium and transient responses to CO2 increase in eight state-of-the-art climate models","volume":"60","issn":"1600-0870","url":"https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2008.00345.x","doi":"10.1111/j.1600-0870.2008.00345.x","abstract":"We compared the climate response of doubled CO2 equilibrium experiments (2 × CO2) by atmosphere–slab ocean coupled general circulation models (ASGCMs) and that of 1% per year CO2 increase experiments (1%CO2 by atmosphere–ocean coupled general circulation models (AOGCMs) using eight state-of-the-art climate models. Climate feedback processes in 2 × CO2 are different from those in 1%CO2, and the equilibrium climate sensitivity (T2×) in 2 × CO2 is different from the effective climate sensitivity (T2×,eff) in 1%CO2. The difference between T2× and T2×,eff is from −1.3 to 1.6 K, a large part of which can be explained by the difference in the ice-albedo and cloud feedback. The largest contribution is cloud SW feedback, and the difference in cloud SW feedback for 2 × CO2 and 1%CO2 could be determined by the distribution of the SAT anomaly which causes differences in the atmospheric thermal structure. An important factor which determines the difference in ice-albedo feedback is the initial sea ice distribution at the Southern Ocean, which is generally overestimated in 2 × CO2 as compared to 1%CO2 and observation. Through the comparison of climate feedback processes in 2 × CO2 and 1%CO2, the possible behaviour of the time evolution of T2×,eff is discussed.","language":"en","number":"5","urldate":"2017-06-10","journal":"Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Yokohata"],"firstnames":["Tokuta"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Emori"],"firstnames":["Seita"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Nozawa"],"firstnames":["Toru"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Ogura"],"firstnames":["Tomoo"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Kawamiya"],"firstnames":["Michio"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Tsushima"],"firstnames":["Yoko"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Suzuki"],"firstnames":["Tatsuo"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Yukimoto"],"firstnames":["Seiji"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Abe-Ouchi"],"firstnames":["Ayako"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Hasumi"],"firstnames":["Hiroyasu"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Sumi"],"firstnames":["Akimasa"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Kimoto"],"firstnames":["Masahide"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"January","year":"2008","keywords":"GA, Untagged","pages":"946–961","bibtex":"@article{yokohata_comparison_2008,\n\ttitle = {Comparison of equilibrium and transient responses to {CO2} increase in eight state-of-the-art climate models},\n\tvolume = {60},\n\tissn = {1600-0870},\n\turl = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2008.00345.x},\n\tdoi = {10.1111/j.1600-0870.2008.00345.x},\n\tabstract = {We compared the climate response of doubled CO2 equilibrium experiments (2 × CO2) by atmosphere–slab ocean coupled general circulation models (ASGCMs) and that of 1\\% per year CO2 increase experiments (1\\%CO2 by atmosphere–ocean coupled general circulation models (AOGCMs) using eight state-of-the-art climate models. Climate feedback processes in 2 × CO2 are different from those in 1\\%CO2, and the equilibrium climate sensitivity (T2×) in 2 × CO2 is different from the effective climate sensitivity (T2×,eff) in 1\\%CO2. The difference between T2× and T2×,eff is from −1.3 to 1.6 K, a large part of which can be explained by the difference in the ice-albedo and cloud feedback. The largest contribution is cloud SW feedback, and the difference in cloud SW feedback for 2 × CO2 and 1\\%CO2 could be determined by the distribution of the SAT anomaly which causes differences in the atmospheric thermal structure. An important factor which determines the difference in ice-albedo feedback is the initial sea ice distribution at the Southern Ocean, which is generally overestimated in 2 × CO2 as compared to 1\\%CO2 and observation. Through the comparison of climate feedback processes in 2 × CO2 and 1\\%CO2, the possible behaviour of the time evolution of T2×,eff is discussed.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {5},\n\turldate = {2017-06-10},\n\tjournal = {Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography},\n\tauthor = {Yokohata, Tokuta and Emori, Seita and Nozawa, Toru and Ogura, Tomoo and Kawamiya, Michio and Tsushima, Yoko and Suzuki, Tatsuo and Yukimoto, Seiji and Abe-Ouchi, Ayako and Hasumi, Hiroyasu and Sumi, Akimasa and Kimoto, Masahide},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2008},\n\tkeywords = {GA, Untagged},\n\tpages = {946--961},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Yokohata, T.","Emori, S.","Nozawa, T.","Ogura, T.","Kawamiya, M.","Tsushima, Y.","Suzuki, T.","Yukimoto, S.","Abe-Ouchi, A.","Hasumi, H.","Sumi, A.","Kimoto, M."],"key":"yokohata_comparison_2008","id":"yokohata_comparison_2008","bibbaseid":"yokohata-emori-nozawa-ogura-kawamiya-tsushima-suzuki-yukimoto-etal-comparisonofequilibriumandtransientresponsestoco2increaseineightstateoftheartclimatemodels-2008","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2008.00345.x"},"keyword":["GA","Untagged"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero-group/ajello/2099979","dataSources":["EndJaSpcpPJCQnJDH"],"keywords":["ga","untagged"],"search_terms":["comparison","equilibrium","transient","responses","co2","increase","eight","state","art","climate","models","yokohata","emori","nozawa","ogura","kawamiya","tsushima","suzuki","yukimoto","abe-ouchi","hasumi","sumi","kimoto"],"title":"Comparison of equilibrium and transient responses to CO2 increase in eight state-of-the-art climate models","year":2008}