An in situ and morphometric study of maize (Zea mays L.) cob rondel phytoliths from Southwestern North American landraces

An in situ and morphometric study of maize (Zea mays L.) cob rondel phytoliths from Southwestern North American landraces. Yost, C. L., Michas, M., Adams, K. R., Swarts, K., Puseman, K., & Ball, T. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 35:102732, February, 2021.

Paper doi abstract bibtex

We present the first comprehensive computer-assisted morphometric analysis of microscopic rondel11As per the International Code for Phytolith Nomenclature 2.0 the names of recognized phytolith morphotypes are written in small caps in this report (Neumann et al., 2019). phytoliths (plant opal microfossils) produced in the cobs of 24 historic Southwestern North American landraces of maize (Zea mays L.) after all were grown in a well-documented agronomic field study. We also present an in situ study of the location of rondel phytolith production within the maize cob and provide a detailed review of previous maize phytolith studies. We found that glumes contained abundant rondel phytoliths throughout the tissue; however, lemma/palea tissue contained no phytoliths. In contrast, cupule tissue had some areas with abundant phytoliths, some with fewer scattered phytoliths, and vast areas that contained no rondel phytoliths. The rondel-rich areas appear to be where the glumes had once attached to the cupule and may be remnants of glume tissue adhering to the cupule. From the morphometric study, we found there were significant differences in the size morphometries of glume rondels depending on their cob location (top, middle, base) but no significant differences in shape morphometries. Using shape morphometries, we could not discriminate reliably among maize cob rondel phytoliths produced by the diverse landraces considered. The inclusion of morphometrics from areas in addition to or in combination with the outer periclinal surface may allow for some discrimination of maize landraces and is an avenue that should be explored further. Although our approach was not successful at identifying differences between essentially modern landraces, there may be significant rondel phytolith morphometric differences between wild, progenitor, and domesticated Zea.

@article{yost_situ_2021,
	title = {An \textit{in situ} and morphometric study of maize (\textit{{Zea} mays} {L}.) cob rondel phytoliths from {Southwestern} {North} {American} landraces},
	volume = {35},
	issn = {2352-409X},
	url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X2030523X},
	doi = {10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102732},
	abstract = {We present the first comprehensive computer-assisted morphometric analysis of microscopic rondel11As per the International Code for Phytolith Nomenclature 2.0 the names of recognized phytolith morphotypes are written in small caps in this report (Neumann et al., 2019). phytoliths (plant opal microfossils) produced in the cobs of 24 historic Southwestern North American landraces of maize (Zea mays L.) after all were grown in a well-documented agronomic field study. We also present an in situ study of the location of rondel phytolith production within the maize cob and provide a detailed review of previous maize phytolith studies. We found that glumes contained abundant rondel phytoliths throughout the tissue; however, lemma/palea tissue contained no phytoliths. In contrast, cupule tissue had some areas with abundant phytoliths, some with fewer scattered phytoliths, and vast areas that contained no rondel phytoliths. The rondel-rich areas appear to be where the glumes had once attached to the cupule and may be remnants of glume tissue adhering to the cupule. From the morphometric study, we found there were significant differences in the size morphometries of glume rondels depending on their cob location (top, middle, base) but no significant differences in shape morphometries. Using shape morphometries, we could not discriminate reliably among maize cob rondel phytoliths produced by the diverse landraces considered. The inclusion of morphometrics from areas in addition to or in combination with the outer periclinal surface may allow for some discrimination of maize landraces and is an avenue that should be explored further. Although our approach was not successful at identifying differences between essentially modern landraces, there may be significant rondel phytolith morphometric differences between wild, progenitor, and domesticated Zea.},
	urldate = {2024-03-22},
	journal = {Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports},
	author = {Yost, Chad L. and Michas, McCaela and Adams, Karen R. and Swarts, Kelly and Puseman, Kathryn and Ball, Terry},
	month = feb,
	year = {2021},
	keywords = {Glumes, Landrace, Maize, Morphometrics, Phytoliths},
	pages = {102732},
}

Downloads: 0

{"_id":"wTLBZ7HEaGzWzd3xf","bibbaseid":"yost-michas-adams-swarts-puseman-ball-aniinsituiandmorphometricstudyofmaizeizeamaysilcobrondelphytolithsfromsouthwesternnorthamericanlandraces-2021","author_short":["Yost, C. L.","Michas, M.","Adams, K. R.","Swarts, K.","Puseman, K.","Ball, T."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"An in situ and morphometric study of maize (Zea mays L.) cob rondel phytoliths from Southwestern North American landraces","volume":"35","issn":"2352-409X","url":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X2030523X","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102732","abstract":"We present the first comprehensive computer-assisted morphometric analysis of microscopic rondel11As per the International Code for Phytolith Nomenclature 2.0 the names of recognized phytolith morphotypes are written in small caps in this report (Neumann et al., 2019). phytoliths (plant opal microfossils) produced in the cobs of 24 historic Southwestern North American landraces of maize (Zea mays L.) after all were grown in a well-documented agronomic field study. We also present an in situ study of the location of rondel phytolith production within the maize cob and provide a detailed review of previous maize phytolith studies. We found that glumes contained abundant rondel phytoliths throughout the tissue; however, lemma/palea tissue contained no phytoliths. In contrast, cupule tissue had some areas with abundant phytoliths, some with fewer scattered phytoliths, and vast areas that contained no rondel phytoliths. The rondel-rich areas appear to be where the glumes had once attached to the cupule and may be remnants of glume tissue adhering to the cupule. From the morphometric study, we found there were significant differences in the size morphometries of glume rondels depending on their cob location (top, middle, base) but no significant differences in shape morphometries. Using shape morphometries, we could not discriminate reliably among maize cob rondel phytoliths produced by the diverse landraces considered. The inclusion of morphometrics from areas in addition to or in combination with the outer periclinal surface may allow for some discrimination of maize landraces and is an avenue that should be explored further. Although our approach was not successful at identifying differences between essentially modern landraces, there may be significant rondel phytolith morphometric differences between wild, progenitor, and domesticated Zea.","urldate":"2024-03-22","journal":"Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Yost"],"firstnames":["Chad","L."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Michas"],"firstnames":["McCaela"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Adams"],"firstnames":["Karen","R."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Swarts"],"firstnames":["Kelly"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Puseman"],"firstnames":["Kathryn"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Ball"],"firstnames":["Terry"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"February","year":"2021","keywords":"Glumes, Landrace, Maize, Morphometrics, Phytoliths","pages":"102732","bibtex":"@article{yost_situ_2021,\n\ttitle = {An \\textit{in situ} and morphometric study of maize (\\textit{{Zea} mays} {L}.) cob rondel phytoliths from {Southwestern} {North} {American} landraces},\n\tvolume = {35},\n\tissn = {2352-409X},\n\turl = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X2030523X},\n\tdoi = {10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102732},\n\tabstract = {We present the first comprehensive computer-assisted morphometric analysis of microscopic rondel11As per the International Code for Phytolith Nomenclature 2.0 the names of recognized phytolith morphotypes are written in small caps in this report (Neumann et al., 2019). phytoliths (plant opal microfossils) produced in the cobs of 24 historic Southwestern North American landraces of maize (Zea mays L.) after all were grown in a well-documented agronomic field study. We also present an in situ study of the location of rondel phytolith production within the maize cob and provide a detailed review of previous maize phytolith studies. We found that glumes contained abundant rondel phytoliths throughout the tissue; however, lemma/palea tissue contained no phytoliths. In contrast, cupule tissue had some areas with abundant phytoliths, some with fewer scattered phytoliths, and vast areas that contained no rondel phytoliths. The rondel-rich areas appear to be where the glumes had once attached to the cupule and may be remnants of glume tissue adhering to the cupule. From the morphometric study, we found there were significant differences in the size morphometries of glume rondels depending on their cob location (top, middle, base) but no significant differences in shape morphometries. Using shape morphometries, we could not discriminate reliably among maize cob rondel phytoliths produced by the diverse landraces considered. The inclusion of morphometrics from areas in addition to or in combination with the outer periclinal surface may allow for some discrimination of maize landraces and is an avenue that should be explored further. Although our approach was not successful at identifying differences between essentially modern landraces, there may be significant rondel phytolith morphometric differences between wild, progenitor, and domesticated Zea.},\n\turldate = {2024-03-22},\n\tjournal = {Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports},\n\tauthor = {Yost, Chad L. and Michas, McCaela and Adams, Karen R. and Swarts, Kelly and Puseman, Kathryn and Ball, Terry},\n\tmonth = feb,\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tkeywords = {Glumes, Landrace, Maize, Morphometrics, Phytoliths},\n\tpages = {102732},\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Yost, C. L.","Michas, M.","Adams, K. R.","Swarts, K.","Puseman, K.","Ball, T."],"key":"yost_situ_2021","id":"yost_situ_2021","bibbaseid":"yost-michas-adams-swarts-puseman-ball-aniinsituiandmorphometricstudyofmaizeizeamaysilcobrondelphytolithsfromsouthwesternnorthamericanlandraces-2021","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X2030523X"},"keyword":["Glumes","Landrace","Maize","Morphometrics","Phytoliths"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/upscpub","dataSources":["3zTPPmKj8BiTcpc6C","9cGcv2t8pRzC92kzs"],"keywords":["glumes","landrace","maize","morphometrics","phytoliths"],"search_terms":["situ","morphometric","study","maize","zea","mays","cob","rondel","phytoliths","southwestern","north","american","landraces","yost","michas","adams","swarts","puseman","ball"],"title":"An in situ and morphometric study of maize (Zea mays L.) cob rondel phytoliths from Southwestern North American landraces","year":2021}