@article{young_ghost_2010,
	title = {The {Ghost} of {Moby}-{Dick} and the {Rhetorical} {Haunting} of the {Ninth} {Court}’s {Anderson} v. {Evans} {Decision}},
	volume = {10},
	language = {en},
	number = {1},
	journal = {Communication Law Review},
	author = {Young, Kelly M},
	year = {2010},
	keywords = {DRI early research 2007-2021, DRI zotero, american indian law, american indian studies, book defense of critical race theory, book methods section, book revision critical race theory, book revision footnote sources, book revision methods section, critical race theory, critical race theory in rhetoric, critical tribal race theory, delimitation of rhetorical possibility, indigeneity, judicial analysis, judicial analysis in rhetorical studies, judicial opinion, law as literature, law as literature and law as rhetoric, law as rhetoric, legal rhetoric, legal rhetorical methods, makah whaling case, tribal, tribal law},
	pages = {28--53},
}

{"_id":"TmyTXgs87qpMEE97d","bibbaseid":"young-theghostofmobydickandtherhetoricalhauntingoftheninthcourtsandersonvevansdecision-2010","author_short":["Young, K. M"],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"The Ghost of Moby-Dick and the Rhetorical Haunting of the Ninth Court’s Anderson v. Evans Decision","volume":"10","language":"en","number":"1","journal":"Communication Law Review","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Young"],"firstnames":["Kelly","M"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2010","keywords":"DRI early research 2007-2021, DRI zotero, american indian law, american indian studies, book defense of critical race theory, book methods section, book revision critical race theory, book revision footnote sources, book revision methods section, critical race theory, critical race theory in rhetoric, critical tribal race theory, delimitation of rhetorical possibility, indigeneity, judicial analysis, judicial analysis in rhetorical studies, judicial opinion, law as literature, law as literature and law as rhetoric, law as rhetoric, legal rhetoric, legal rhetorical methods, makah whaling case, tribal, tribal law","pages":"28–53","bibtex":"@article{young_ghost_2010,\n\ttitle = {The {Ghost} of {Moby}-{Dick} and the {Rhetorical} {Haunting} of the {Ninth} {Court}’s {Anderson} v. {Evans} {Decision}},\n\tvolume = {10},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tjournal = {Communication Law Review},\n\tauthor = {Young, Kelly M},\n\tyear = {2010},\n\tkeywords = {DRI early research 2007-2021, DRI zotero, american indian law, american indian studies, book defense of critical race theory, book methods section, book revision critical race theory, book revision footnote sources, book revision methods section, critical race theory, critical race theory in rhetoric, critical tribal race theory, delimitation of rhetorical possibility, indigeneity, judicial analysis, judicial analysis in rhetorical studies, judicial opinion, law as literature, law as literature and law as rhetoric, law as rhetoric, legal rhetoric, legal rhetorical methods, makah whaling case, tribal, tribal law},\n\tpages = {28--53},\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Young, K. M"],"key":"young_ghost_2010","id":"young_ghost_2010","bibbaseid":"young-theghostofmobydickandtherhetoricalhauntingoftheninthcourtsandersonvevansdecision-2010","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["DRI early research 2007-2021","DRI zotero","american indian law","american indian studies","book defense of critical race theory","book methods section","book revision critical race theory","book revision footnote sources","book revision methods section","critical race theory","critical race theory in rhetoric","critical tribal race theory","delimitation of rhetorical possibility","indigeneity","judicial analysis","judicial analysis in rhetorical studies","judicial opinion","law as literature","law as literature and law as rhetoric","law as rhetoric","legal rhetoric","legal rhetorical methods","makah whaling case","tribal","tribal law"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/odellcampbell","dataSources":["mQ5vNnJEGZpAggWxg"],"keywords":["dri early research 2007-2021","dri zotero","american indian law","american indian studies","book defense of critical race theory","book methods section","book revision critical race theory","book revision footnote sources","book revision methods section","critical race theory","critical race theory in rhetoric","critical tribal race theory","delimitation of rhetorical possibility","indigeneity","judicial analysis","judicial analysis in rhetorical studies","judicial opinion","law as literature","law as literature and law as rhetoric","law as rhetoric","legal rhetoric","legal rhetorical methods","makah whaling case","tribal","tribal law"],"search_terms":["ghost","moby","dick","rhetorical","haunting","ninth","court","anderson","evans","decision","young"],"title":"The Ghost of Moby-Dick and the Rhetorical Haunting of the Ninth Court’s Anderson v. Evans Decision","year":2010}